Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Ridgemount Cottage Nursery School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
M Hendry & L Gerrard Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP522047
- Inspection date verified
16 Aug 2016
- Inspectors verified
Anita McKelvey
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
GL3 4EH
- Name on report verified
Ridgemount Cottage Nursery School
- URN verified
101517
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It fails to identify breaches of requirements of both the Early Years and the Childcare Register. p.1
- Staff do not understand that they need to take responsibility for reporting serious accidents or concerns about children's safety and welfare to external agencies in the absence of the owner/manager. p.3
- The weaknesses in safeguarding put children at risk. p.3
- Staff know the possible indicators that a child is at risk of harm. p.3
- On occasion, staff do not support children to understand that their behaviour is unacceptable. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not always engage sufficiently with children aged over two years because they are busy setting up activities or clearing away after snack or lunch time. p.3
- This does not ensure that this age group is well occupied, interested and fully challenged. p.3
- For example, children left the table as they finished their snack, but there were no activities set out or clear plans for what they would do next. p.3
- Staff working with the younger children effectively engage them in activities that interest them. p.3
- For example, they showed them how the frog bubble machine 'drank' the mixture and then made bubbles for them to pop. p.3
- Young children recited favourite phrases from songs as they chased the bubbles and played with bubbles in a washing-up bowl. p.3
- Staff make regular observations of all children's progress and this is closely monitored by the owner/manager to identify and close any gaps in their learning. p.3
- Parents are suitably involved in their children's learning. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“For example, they give sensitive support for their emerging communication skills.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 989
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ridgemount Cottage Nursery School 73 Ermin Street, Brockworth, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL3 4EH
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 16 August 2016 13 September 2012
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Staff do not fully understand their responsibility for referring concerns about children's safety, well-being and welfare to external agencies. The manager has not made sure that risk assessments for all areas accurately identify potential hazards and are used to minimise risks to children to keep them safe. Arrangements for staff working with the children aged over two years are not effective. Staff meet adult-to-child ratios but sometimes struggle to supervise children and organise activities for them. They are not always able to meet their individual needs or provide suitable challenge to help children make as much progress as possible. The manager does not monitor and supervise staff effectively. She does not make sure that they understand their roles and responsibilities fully or take steps to improve their ability to support the care and learning needs of children aged two years and above.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
On occasion, staff do not support children to understand that their behaviour is unacceptable. Self-evaluation is ineffective. It fails to identify breaches of requirements of both the Early Years and the Childcare Register. The manager misses opportunities to use feedback from parents and children to help identify improvements to the setting.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff help younger children make good progress. For example, they give sensitive support for their emerging communication skills.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure staff fully understand procedures to safeguard children, including when they must take action and notify external agencies of safeguarding concerns and accidents 29/08/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that risk assessments identify all potential hazards in the play environments and take effective action to minimise these to keep children safe 29/08/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that staffing arrangements meet the individual care and learning needs of children aged over two years 29/09/2016
p.2
Due Date
provide effective monitoring and supervision of staff to ensure they understand their roles and responsibilities and to improve the practice of those working with children aged over two years. 29/09/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make sure staff use consistent strategies to support children's understanding of what is expected of them ensure that self-evaluation accurately identifies breaches of requirements and includes feedback from parents and children.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspection was carried out as a result of the risk assessment process. The inspector spoke with one parent during the inspection. The inspector observed the quality of the teaching inside and outdoors and spoke with the staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector held a leadership and management meeting with the owner/manager. The inspector sampled paperwork, including children's records, policies and procedures, accident records, risk assessments, planning and self-evaluation.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. Staff do not understand that they need to take responsibility for reporting serious accidents or concerns about children's safety and welfare to external agencies in the absence of the owner/manager. They state that they would leave this responsibility to the owner/manager on her return, which would lead to delays. Staff know the possible indicators that a child is at risk of harm. The owner/manager has not fully risk assessed the premises to identify and minimise all hazards, such as missing blocks in the paving outdoors. This does not ensure that children can play and learn safely. Staffing arrangements for children aged over two years, including some who have special educational needs, are not effective. Although adult-to-child ratios are met for this group, children range from ages two to nine years and staff are not always able to offer adequate supervision, support and activities that effectively match the children's individual needs.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The owner/manager ensures that staff have relevant qualifications and sufficient professional development opportunities, and carries out staff supervision meetings. However, these are not effective in ensuring that staff understand their roles and responsibilities or in improving the provision for children aged over two years. There are sufficient staff with paediatric first-aid qualifications to ensure that accidents and injuries can be dealt with appropriately. The owner/manager evaluates the provision but does not identify breaches in requirement. She also misses opportunities to engage parents and children in reviewing the setting. The quality of the provision has deteriorated.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff do not always engage sufficiently with children aged over two years because they are busy setting up activities or clearing away after snack or lunch time. This does not ensure that this age group is well occupied, interested and fully challenged. For example, children left the table as they finished their snack, but there were no activities set out or clear plans for what they would do next. Staff working with the younger children effectively engage them in activities that interest them. For example, they showed them how the frog bubble machine 'drank' the mixture and then made bubbles for them to pop. Young children recited favourite phrases from songs as they chased the bubbles and played with bubbles in a washing-up bowl. Staff make regular observations of all children's progress and this is closely monitored by the owner/manager to identify and close any gaps in their learning. Parents are suitably involved in their children's learning. Staff share
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
information with them to help ensure consistency.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in safeguarding put children at risk. Staff working with the children aged over two years do not provide consistent strategies to manage children's behaviour. For example, when children snatched cups from each other at the water tray, staff did not explain why their actions were hurtful or upsetting to others. Children learn about healthy lifestyles. For example, staff talk with them about healthy eating and involve them in cooking and baking activities. The cook provides nutritious meals using fresh produce where possible.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children's learning and development are inconsistent. Children aged over two years do not always benefit from experiences and planning that help them to make good progress. For example, when they experimented with rolling balls down the sloped patio, some of these rolled out under the fence. They tried to reach through the gate to get them but gave up when they realised that they could not reach them and staff did not notice what was happening. Babies and toddlers aged under two years develop strong physical skills and confidence. For example, they played peek-a-boo with staff and crawled through the tunnel to reach them.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 101517 Local authority Gloucestershire Inspection number 1067069 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 47 Number of children on roll 58 Name of registered person M Hendry & L Gerrard Partnership
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 13 September 2012 Telephone number 01452 864107
p.5
reference number
Ridgemount Cottage Nursery School registered in 1993. It is privately owned and is situated in Brockworth, a residential suburb on the outskirts of Gloucester. The setting offers care from 8am to 6pm on Monday to Friday, all year round. There are 12 members of staff; of whom, three have qualified teacher status, one has early years professional status and six hold appropriate early years qualifications. There is one member of staff in the process of gaining a qualification.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion