Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

First Steps Montessori Prep School

Inspected 15 Aug 2016 · URN 405451

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Maria Adesegha

  • Group reference verified

    RP904413

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Aug 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Preston

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    E7 0NG

  • Name on report verified

    First Steps Montessori Prep School

  • URN verified

    405451

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−52Criticalmore positive than 36% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectiveeffectivelyenjoysecuresafe
Criticismat risknot alwaysineffectiveweaknessesconcernsfailsnot effectivedeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings307w−61
  • Leadership176w−75
  • What needs to improve312w+24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
781
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 13%What needs to improve 23%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

First Steps Montessori Prep School 5 Sebert Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 0NG

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 15 August 2016 20 May 2013

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Some staff do not fully understand the possible signs that a child is at risk of harm or the action to take if concerns are raised. This puts children's welfare at risk.  The provider fails to maintain the required adult-to-child ratios at all times to ensure children's well-being.  The provider does not implement effective recruitment procedures to keep children safe. She does not ensure that she gathers all appropriate information to make sure that all new staff are suitable to carry out their role.  The manager does not ensure that all new staff have induction training to help them understand their roles and responsibilities.  Staff do not always make effective use of assessment to ensure that they know children's interests and styles of learning. Activities do not always match children's needs and interests to ensure they make good progress.  Self-evaluation is ineffective. The provider has not identified breaches in requirements

p.1

This provision is inadequate

of both the Early Years Register and the Childcare Register. The quality of the provision has declined since the last inspection.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children enjoy art activities, such as making handprints with paint.  Staff work with parents to ensure consistency in children's care and learning.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 train all staff to understand the safeguarding policy and procedure and to have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues 20/08/2016

p.2

Due Date

 maintain adult-to-child ratios at all times to meet the needs of the children and ensure their safety 15/08/2016

p.2

Due Date

 implement effective recruitment procedures to ensure the suitability of staff to carry out their role 20/08/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that all new staff receive induction training so that they are aware of their roles and responsibilities 20/08/2016

p.2

Due Date

 make effective use of assessment to understand children's interests and learning styles to plan challenging activities and support their progress. 20/08/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 use self-evaluation effectively to identify breaches in requirements and target key aspects of practice to rapidly improve outcomes for children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspection was carried out as a result of the risk assessment process.  The inspector talked with the manager, staff, and the children at various times during the inspection. The inspector also undertook a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector observed the staff's interaction with children indoors and outdoors, and looked at a range of resources and equipment.  The inspector sampled a range of documentation, including records relating to children and staff, and checked safeguarding procedures and feedback from parents.  The inspector had discussions with the manager about policies and procedures, methods of assessing and planning for children's progress and how she works with parents, staff and other providers.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. Some staff do not fully understand the signs that indicate a child may be at risk and do not know who to refer concerns to. The provider does not always maintain adult-to-child ratios and does not ensure that recruitment procedures are secure. She does not take appropriate steps to gather all information to ensure new staff's suitability. These weaknesses put children at risk. The provider ensures that existing staff remain suitable and that adults without a Disclosure and Barring Service check are not left alone with children. Staff carry out effective risk assessments to reduce any risks to children. The manager provides appropriate coaching and support for existing staff. However, she does not ensure that new staff undergo an induction procedure to make sure that they fully understand their roles and responsibilities. The manager monitors children's progress sufficiently to identify any gaps in their learning and takes appropriate

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

steps to help them catch up. However, self-evaluation does not effectively identify all areas for improvement and the quality of provision has not been maintained.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff do not always make good use of their observations and assessments to understand what children are interested in and identify their individual learning styles. This limits their ability to plan effectively for children's next steps in learning and provide them with sufficient challenge to help them make good progress. Children develop appropriate skills. For example, they develop their physical skills by climbing and riding wheeled toys. Children enjoy painting and building, and playing with different sized cars. They learn about living things, such as the chickens that the provider has at the setting, and how to care for them.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weaknesses in safeguarding put children at risk. The provider does not ensure that all new staff understand their roles and responsibilities to meet children's care and learning needs. Staff understand the key-person role. They establish secure attachments with the children and know them well. Staff manage children's behaviour effectively. Children understand what is acceptable and the consequences of their behaviour. Children learn to respect others. For example, they learn about different festivals. Staff provide healthy meals and ensure children's dietary needs are met.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children are adequately prepared for the move on to their next stage of learning, although they are not supported to make as much progress as possible. Children learn how to share, take turns and make decisions. They communicate with each other and with staff, discussing their ideas. Those who are learning to speak English as an additional language develop good communication skills.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 405451 Local authority Newham Inspection number 1061077 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 28 Number of children on roll 16 Name of registered person Maria Adesegha

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 20 May 2013 Telephone number 020 8555 0125

p.4

reference number

First Steps Montessori Prep School registered in 1990. It is situated in Forest Gate, in the London Borough of Newham. The setting is open each weekday from 8am to 6pm for 51 weeks of the year. The setting receives funding for early education for children aged two, three and four years. The provider employs seven members of staff with a range of qualifications up to level 6.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion