Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Children's Home run by St Christopher’s Fellowship in Islington

Inspected 3 Aug 2016 · published 17 Aug 2016 · URN 1159682

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bridget Goddard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    3 Aug 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Bridget Goddard

  • URN verified

    1159682

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrongsafeconsistentlygood progressengagingimproved
Criticismat riskconcernsinadequateharmineffectiveinsufficienttoo slowseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings508w+0
  • What needs to improve334w+16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
838
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 30%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

This monitoring visit

The purpose of this visit was to evaluate the progress made by the provider on the predominately safeguarding concerns identified at the full inspection on 17 June 2016. In addition, the home was without a permanent manager and daily care and education were not planned effectively. The overall inspection judgement was inadequate. The full inspection found that the home was not keeping young people sufficiently safe. Specifically, young people were increasingly going missing and engaging in high-risk behaviours. Staff attempts to reduce this behaviour were ineffective and there was insufficient monitoring of each young person's patterns and trends. Boundary setting in relation to education attendance, daily routines and activities was not consistent. External agencies were concerned about this picture and the home was beginning to act on this, but the pace of change was too slow. The home had lost two

p.2

This monitoring visit

registered managers in the nine months since opening, and had an interim manager at the time of the full inspection for the second time. These events seriously inhibited the management team's capacity to lead the necessary changes. Statutory requirements were made in relation to the points above and these are detailed below. The progress made in meeting these requirements was assessed at the monitoring visit. In summary, the management team and the staff have made very good progress on addressing these serious concerns. A new manager and most recently a deputy manager are now in place. The manager has worked closely with her operational managers and has effectively led the progress that has been made. Young people are now safer than they were. For example, throughout June, one young person had 10 episodes of going missing and in July had no episodes of going missing. In part, this reflects the impact of another young person moving to

p.2

This monitoring visit

an alternative placement, but this is not the whole story. Staff have been proactive in restricting young people’s access to social media and have established daily routines. In addition, some staff have received further necessary training. Management monitoring of safeguarding is much improved, and strong links with other agencies are being reformed. Staffing levels are more robust. Not only is there a new management team in place, but there will shortly be two new residential care workers. Work is ongoing in making the electronic restriction of liberty system more effective. However, crucially, the manager and staff are clear that what is most effective in keeping young people safe is the quality of relationships that staff form with young people. The staff group has always been able to form warm and accepting relationships with young people. But, there are now some strong signs that staff are building on these strengths and consistently

p.2

This monitoring visit

implementing boundaries. In summary, the pace of change in this home has been fast and it has had a positive impact on young people. However, the task now is to embed these improvements into everyday practice. This will be tested at the home’s forthcoming inspection when the home’s ability to sustain, as well as implement, change will be examined.

p.2

Requirements made at the full inspection on 17 June 2016

12: Ensure that staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. This relates to staff receiving appropriate safeguarding training and support. (Regulation 12 (2) (a) (i)) 12: Ensure that staff take effective action whenever there is serious concern about a child’s welfare. This particularly relates to children’s use of mobile phones. (Regulation 12 (2) (a) (vi)) 12: Ensure that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. This particularly relates to the use of temporary restriction of liberty measures. (Regulation 12 (2) (b)) 12: Ensure that the effectiveness of the home’s child protection policies is monitored regularly. (Regulation 12 (2) (e)) 28: Ensure that the new manager of the home has the appropriate experience, qualification and skills to manage the home effectively and lead the care of

p.3

Requirements made at the full inspection on 17 June 2016

children. This particularly relates to experience in safeguarding children at risk of abuse or exploitation. (Regulation 28 (1) (b) (i)) 13: Ensure that the home has sufficient staff to provide safe care for each child. This particularly relates to night staffing numbers. (Regulation 13 (2) (d) ) 45: Ensure that an effective system is developed to monitor, review and evaluate missing from care patterns for young people which determines the actions necessary to improve the quality of care provided for children. (Regulation 45 (2) (a) (c)) 14: Ensure that children receive effectively planned care. This particularly relates to consistently executed boundaries around attendance at education, night time routines and systematically planned activities. (Regulation 14 (1) (a)) 5: Seek to develop and maintain effective professional relationships with such persons, bodies or organisations as the registered person considers appropriate,

p.3

Requirements made at the full inspection on 17 June 2016

having regard to the range of needs of children for whom it is intended that the children’s home is to provide care and accommodation. This particularly relates to relationships with the local multi-agency safeguarding panel. (Regulation 5 (d))

p.3

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the children's home since its last Ofsted inspection. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. in the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about "Ofsted" which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of this guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.5

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion