Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 2
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −92Very criticalmore positive than 0% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Criticismfailedconcernsat riskharmnot safe

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    2
    Words of findings
    437
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 46, typical 45
    Average sentence
    20 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    0%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Summary of complaint

    On 22 March 2016, we received a complaint that raised concerns about the suitability of people living at the childminder's home, leaving children unattended and the safety of the premises.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    We needed to look into these concerns to see if the childminder is meeting the Early Years Foundation Stage welfare requirements relating to safeguarding and promoting children’s welfare. In particular, the requirements relating to suitable people, child protection and safety.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    On 6 April 2016 we carried out an unannounced visit to the childminder. We found that the childminder failed to notify us of persons living at the address. This meant that the childminder failed to supply us with information so that suitability checks could be carried out. As a result, children have been put at risk of harm because minded children have been looked after while unvetted adults have been living on the premises.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    In addition to this, the childminder failed to notify us of an allegation made that she had left children unsupervised and failed to supply us with children's records of attendance. Therefore, we believe that children have been left unsupervised and put at risk of harm.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    We also found that the premises are not safe for the provision of care and education for children.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    We suspended the childminder’s registration because we believed children may be at risk of harm. The childminder may not provide childcare for which registration is required while the suspension is in place, and will commit an offence if they do so. We are taking steps to cancel the registration because we believe that the childminder is no longer suitable to remain registered. The childminder has objected to our intention to cancel the registration.

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    We carried out an unannounced visit on 15 August 2016 to monitor compliance with the suspension notice and found that the childminder was complying with the notice. The childminder had informed us that she had taken action to address the concerns. However, we found that the concerns relating to unvetted adults living on the premises and the risks within the premises still remain. In addition to this, the childminder does not have current public liability insurance.

    p.2

    Summary of complaint

    The childminder remains suspended while we take steps to cancel the registration.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.

    p.2

    Publication of complaints

    For further information on how we deal with complaints about providers, please view the Early years compliance handbook which can be found here at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-provider-non-compliance- action-by-ofsted

    p.2

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion