Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Kindred Hanwell

Inspected 18 May 2016 · published 24 Jun 2016 · URN 160173

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Seema Parmar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 May 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Seema Parmar

  • Early years verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    W7 2DT

  • Name on report verified

    Buttons Day Nursery School

  • URN verified

    160173

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−41Criticalmore positive than 51% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoystrong relationshipsmake good progresseffectivelycaringrobustkindclear
Criticismconcernsweaknot effectivefaileddo not knowweaknessesnot effectivelynot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings564w−47
  • Leadership121w−66
  • What needs to improve215w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
882
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 7
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Buttons Day Nursery School Buttons Day Nursery School, 99 Oaklands Road, LONDON, W7 2DT

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 18 May 2016 29 January 2015

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of a significant event relating to safeguarding concerns and a number of early years foundation stage requirements have been breached.  Procedures are not in place to ensure the ongoing suitability of staff to work with children. The leadership team do not follow safeguarding procedures. Staff do not know what to do if they have concerns about a child.  The key person system is not well embedded. Staff do not use information from parents or observations to assess and plan children's next steps in learning effectively.  Checks for two-year-old children are not consistently completed. Staff do not provide parents with a short written summary of their child's learning and progress.  Staff do not sufficiently promote children's communication and language skills, including those children who speak English as an additional language.  Self-evaluation is weak. Monitoring systems are in the early stages and emerging. The

p.1

This provision is inadequate

leadership team has not effectively identified all areas for improvement.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff are kind and caring. Older children enjoy fresh air and exercise during outdoor play, promoting their health and well-being.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure robust procedures are put in place to monitor ongoing staff suitability, in particular, requirements around disqualification by association 27/05/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure the designated safeguarding lead follows the nursery safeguarding policy and procedure in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff 27/05/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure all staff have a clear understanding of the setting’s safeguarding policies and procedures, in particular, the Local Safeguarding Children Board guidelines 27/05/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure key persons build strong relationships with parents and children to make sure children’s individual emotional care and learning needs are met 01/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure staff work with parents to find out what children know and can do already when they first start at nursery and use this information along with observations of learning to plan for what children need to learn next 01/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure the required progress check is completed for all children between the ages of two and three years and provide parents with a short written summary of their child's development 01/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve teaching of communication and language to ensure all children including those who speak English as an additional language develop the skills they need for future learning. 01/07/2016

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspection was carried out following concerns raised about the provider meeting the requirements for registration and the quality of the provision for children.  The inspector was accompanied by a quality assurance inspector.  The inspector held discussions with the regional early years manager, the manager and staff at appropriate times during the day.  The inspector looked at documentation relating to children's learning records, the nursery action plan, evidence of staff suitability and safeguarding policies and procedures.  The inspector observed the quality of teaching indoors and outdoors to assess the impact on children's learning.  The inspector conducted a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector took into account the views of parents, staff and children who were present on the day of the inspection.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Recent changes to both the leadership team and staff team have resulted in a significant impact on the quality of provision. Safeguarding is not effective and compromises the welfare and safety of children. Staff do not have a clear understanding of the setting’s safeguarding procedures or those of the Local Safeguarding Children Board, in order to fully protect children should concerns arise. The new leadership have identified and are implementing an action plan to address a number of areas for improvement. However, it is too soon to see the impact of the actions taken. Leaders have identified well-founded plans to make changes to improve the visibility of staff who deal with children’s personal care needs in an enclosed nappy changing area.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The quality of teaching is weak. Many of the staff, including the manager, are new to the nursery and a high number of agency staff provide cover to meet ratios. Staff do not use observations they make to assess what children know, understand and can do already to inform planning. As a result, activities do not typically match the individual needs of children or help them move on in their learning. Parents are not encouraged to contribute to their children's learning at the nursery or at home. Pre-school children have access to a range of resources, in which they show interest and engagement. Staff supervise children appropriately, however, they do not effectively extend and build on children's learning. Staff miss many chances to help children develop and make good progress in their speaking, listening and comprehension skills.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Key people are known as play partners for the children, however they are not fully effective. Staff are kind. However, babies and children do not form secure attachments and build relationships with their play partner, to support their emotional well-being. This is due to recent changes in the staff team and reliance on agency staff, while leaders and managers recruit permanent staff. Parents do not know who their child's play partner is. This does not help promote children's continuity of care and learning between home and the nursery. Children behave well and show their understanding of acceptable boundaries set in the nursery. For example, when noise levels rise in the ‘little learners’ area staff gently draw children's attention to this by clapping hands, and reminding everyone to continue to play, keeping the noise level down.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children do not make the progress they should due to the weaknesses in teaching. Staff do not plan sufficiently well to help children move on and as a result the learning that takes place is incidental. Younger children enjoy sensory play and develop their emerging physical skills, such as crawling and walking. The leadership team is not tracking groups who may need targeted support, nor do they provide extension for more able children, to help them progress to their next stages in learning.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 160173 Local authority Ealing Inspection number 1049895 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 86 Number of children on roll 102 Name of provider Satnam Parhar Associates Limited Date of previous inspection 29 January 2015 Telephone number 02085670949

p.5

Setting details

Buttons Day Nursery School registered in 2001. It is one of four nurseries owned by the same provider. It is located in the London Borough of Ealing. The nursery is open each weekday from 7.30am until 6pm, for 51 weeks of the year. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four. The nursery employs 18 members of staff. The team consists of a cook, the manager who holds the Early Years Professional Status; one member of staff holds a Masters degree in Early childhood Studies; three staff members are unqualified and the remaining 12 staff hold appropriate early years qualifications.

p.5

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.5

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Setting details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion