Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Langdale School Care Club

Inspected 7 Jul 2016 · URN EY461850

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Susan King

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Langdale School Care Club Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP901948

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Jul 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Susan King

  • Early years verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ST5 3QE

  • Name on report verified

    Langdale School Care Club

  • URN verified

    EY461850

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongeffectivelyenjoywell supportedimprovedconfidentlyswiftly
Criticismweaknessesat risknot robustconcernlacksnot alwaysnot cleargaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings50w0
  • What needs to improve878w−26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
889
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 59%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Langdale School Care Club Langdale Road, Clayton, Newcastle under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 3QE

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 7 July 2016 9 February 2016

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Risk assessment of the outdoor area is not robust enough. As a result, there are occasions when hazards are not identified and removed quickly enough.  Although the manager provides regular support and training for practitioners, she does not check the quality of their teaching. As a result, practitioners are not helped sufficiently to improve.  The planning for activities does not take enough account of what children know, understand and can do. Consequently, teaching does not rigorously target what children need to learn next.  Self-evaluation is not methodical enough to ensure that actions to address weaknesses in practice are taken swiftly and effectively.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children have frequent opportunities to listen to stories individually and in small groups. Practitioners read expressively and ask children questions about the story and what might happen next. As a result, children learn to enjoy stories. They begin to understand that stories unfold in a sequence from the beginning to the end.  Practitioners provide sensitive care and support for children who are new to the care club pre-school. For example, when recently admitted children are reluctant to participate, practitioners play close by with other children. This means that new children can watch and listen until they feel ready to join in.  The out-of-school club is well organised. Children play happily together. When it is time for school they listen carefully to practitioners and know the routines they must follow. This helps children to arrive in school on time and ready to learn.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve systems for outdoor risk assessment 21/07/2016  improve systems for monitoring the quality of teaching so that practitioners receive support and training that is precisely matched to what they need to do to raise standards 08/09/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the planning of activities takes full account of what children need to learn next, so that all children benefit from taking part and are well supported to take the next steps in their learning. 06/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 evaluate the provision more thoroughly, in order to quickly recognise weaknesses in practice and procedures and to drive rapid improvement.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the club manager.  The inspector held a meeting with the club manager. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the club's self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of practitioners working in the club.  The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Risk assessments carried out daily do not include close checking of the perimeter of the outdoor play area. As a result, when neighbours make changes to the boundary fence, practitioners do not immediately identify potential hazards to children. Nevertheless, actions taken following the last inspection to address risks associated with children's use of tablet devices have been strong and effective. The impact on children's learning of practitioners' attendance at training is not checked. For example, practitioners attended training to improve their understanding of how children learn to link letters with sounds. However, because teaching is not monitored effectively, the reason for practitioners attending the training is not clear. Furthermore, there is no measurement of how teaching, or the rate of children's progress, has improved following the training. Safeguarding is effective. Practitioners know what they must do if they consider that a

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

child is at risk of abuse or neglect. The recruitment of new practitioners is safely managed.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The assessment of the progress of children whose communication and language development gives cause for concern lacks precision. Consequently, plans for their learning do not focus closely enough on the elements of their speech and language that require attention. Planned activities do not take enough account of what children are ready to learn next. For example, children demonstrate good cutting skills, but the activity set out for them is too difficult for any of them to complete. However, in general, teaching helps to promote children's progress. Children learn the names of the days of the week, as they are repeated every day at group time. They learn the meaning of the words loud and quiet when they play percussion instruments and sing together. Children take part in self- registration every day so they learn to recognise their name in print.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's well-being is not always promoted to the highest level. However, staff supervise children well to make sure they come to no harm. Children follow consistent rules and routines. They learn to use the toilet independently and know that they must wash their hands afterwards. Children know that they have to clean their teeth regularly. A high proportion of older pre-school children attend the school nursery class in the room next door for part of each day. Both teams work with parents to prepare children well emotionally for their move on to the Reception class. Children have daily opportunities to climb, run and pedal vehicles outdoors. This helps to promote their physical development. Children confidently approach practitioners to ask questions. Practitioners promote children's self-esteem well.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Weaknesses in teaching and assessment mean that children do not make as much progress as they could. Gaps in their learning are not closed as swiftly as possible. However, most children make typical progress in relation to their age and starting points and are ready to start school. Children begin to form the letters in their name correctly. They count accurately and understand some of the purposes of numbers and counting.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY461850 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 1040254 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 11 Total number of places 85 Number of children on roll 157 Name of registered person Langdale School Care Club Committee

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 9 February 2016 Telephone number 01782 714459

p.4

reference number

Langdale School Care Club was registered in 2013. The club employs 12 members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 5, one at level 4, seven at level 3 and one at level 2. The club opens from Monday to Friday all year round, except for bank holidays and two weeks at Christmas. Pre-school and holiday club sessions are from 7.30am until 6pm. Out-of-school club sessions are from 7.30am until 9am and from 3.15pm until 6pm. The club provides funded early education for three- and four-year-old children. It supports children who have special educational needs or disability and those who speak English as an additional language.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion