Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Whitehill Primary School
Summary
Elaine White (lead), Clare Nash
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 May 2016
- Inspectors verified
Clare Nash, Elaine White
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SK4 1PB
- Name on report verified
Whitehill Primary School
- URN verified
106084
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement p.1
- Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement p.1
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement p.1
- Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement p.1
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement p.1
- Leaders and governors have not yet secured consistently good teaching and outcomes for pupils. p.1
- Pupils are not making good progress in all year groups. p.1
- Some teachers do not challenge the most able pupils to extend their learning and deepen their thinking. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families8
“The majority of parents express positive views of the school.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 2,377
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Whitehill Primary School Whitehill Street West, Heaton Norris, Stockport, Cheshire SK4 1PB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
Leaders and governors have not yet secured consistently good teaching and outcomes for pupils. Pupils are not making good progress in all year groups. Some teachers do not challenge the most able pupils to extend their learning and deepen their thinking. In some year groups and subjects, boys’ achievement lags behind that of girls. Teaching does not consistently interest and engage pupils. As a result, pupils do not always make the progress of which they are capable. The roles of some middle leaders are not fully established. Subject leaders have not had enough impact on improving the quality of teaching and raising standards. Not all staff have high enough expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Attendance is below the national average and the rate of persistent absence is higher than the national average. Systems to check pupils’ progress do not ensure that leaders have the most accurate view of the
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The recently established leadership team has high expectations and has already brought about improvements to teaching and behaviour. Pupils are now making faster progress. Children in the early years make good progress and are well prepared to transfer to Year 1. Governors have a good knowledge of the school’s key priorities and provide effective support and challenge to the headteacher. Pupils say they enjoy school and have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching for all pupils, by: ensuring that teachers set more challenging tasks for all pupils, particularly the most able ensuring that teachers’ questioning consistently extends pupils’ learning and deepens their understanding focusing on activities that engage pupils, particularly boys, more effectively in learning so that all pupils make good progress and gaps in attainment and progress between boys and girls are closed making sure that expectations for pupils’ behaviour are always high.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Strengthen the quality of leadership and management, by: improving the accuracy of teachers’ assessments of pupils’ work developing the roles of subject leaders so that they play a bigger part in improving the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement in their subjects redoubling efforts to work with pupils’ families to improve attendance and reduce rates of persistent absence, particularly for disadvantaged pupils.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders and governors have not ensured that the quality of teaching, behaviour and pupils’ achievement are consistently good throughout the school. This is partly because the systems and initiatives put in place by the recently appointed headteacher and the leadership team have not had sufficient time to have an impact on pupils’ learning. Better checks by leaders on the quality of teaching and rigorous training for teachers have ensured that the quality of teaching, particularly of mathematics, has improved. As a result, pupils in some year groups are making good progress. This good progress is not, however, consistent in all year groups or across subjects. Leaders have a generally accurate knowledge of the school and have identified the main priorities for improvement. Assessment systems are developing and do not always give a clear picture of the progress of pupils in each year group. This means that leaders and governors do not have a fully accurate view of pupils’
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
current progress throughout the school. Most subject leaders and the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) are new to their roles and are becoming established in them. Their involvement in checks on the quality of teaching and progress in their subjects is still limited. This means that they have not been as effective as they should be in improving the quality of teaching and raising standards. The recently appointed headteacher and the deputy headteacher have a clear vision and determined drive for improvement and for high-quality teaching and learning. This vision is supported by the class teachers, most of whom joined the school at the same time as the headteacher in September 2015. The curriculum provides a broad and interesting range of activities for pupils. Pupils’ learning is enriched through a wide variety of ‘Friday academy’ activities such as a film club, cross-country running and learning
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Japanese. They also benefit from after-school clubs, for example in creative writing, mathematics, cheerleading and rounders. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is well catered for and staff promote British values well. Pupils learn about democracy through elections to the school council. They learn to show tolerance and to respect the beliefs of others through learning about a range of faiths. The majority of parents express positive views of the school. Many parents who spoke with inspectors praised the improvements to the school, particularly in communication and in the safety of the premises since the arrival of the new headteacher. The local authority has provided considerable support to the school since the last inspection. This is reducing now, owing to the confidence that the local authority has in the current school leaders to bring about further improvement. Pupil premium funding is generally well spent. Additional staff help pupils with their learning. As a result,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
gaps are closing between the performance of disadvantaged pupils and that of other pupils. Leaders have also allocated funds to provide staffing to tackle below-average attendance and above-average persistent absence among disadvantaged pupils. This work is beginning to have an impact but is in the early stages of development. The primary physical education and sport funding is used well to employ a specialist coach and purchase additional resources. More pupils have participated in competitive sports as a result of this investment. The governance of the school Governors are passionate about the school and committed to bringing about further improvements. Since the last inspection, they have developed their own skills and provided a good level of support and challenge to the headteacher. Governors know the school and are aware of the areas in which it needs to improve further. Governors have a good knowledge of the quality of teaching. They ensure that pay increases are only
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
awarded where teaching is good and that any underperformance is identified and acted on to improve pupils’ learning. The school’s arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The school works well with parents and external agencies to ensure that pupils are kept safe. Staff have up-to-date training and are vigilant over pupils’ safety. Leaders have ensured that the safety of the school site has improved since the last inspection.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Teaching, learning and assessment require improvement because, although the quality of teaching and learning is improving, it is not consistently good in all year groups and subjects. Teachers do not always provide activities that extend pupils’ learning sufficiently or ask questions that challenge and deepen pupils’ thinking. For example, pupils of widely differing abilities are sometimes given the same activity to complete. Consequently, pupils are not always fully engaged in their learning, as the task is too easy for some. This affects the progress pupils make, and particularly slows the progress of the most able pupils. Expectations for pupils’ good behaviour are not always high enough or reinforced well. For example, pupils continue to talk when the teacher is talking and do not always respond to the school’s policy of awarding ‘dojos’ for good behaviour. At these times, pupils’ learning slows as they lose focus on the task.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
At times, staff do not use what they know about pupils’ interests and ways of learning to provide activities which interest and engage pupils. This means that pupils quickly lose focus on their learning. For example, some Year 2 pupils were not fully engaged in a geography lesson. As a result, their behaviour declined and a small minority of pupils interrupted the learning of others. Staff have received training in teaching mathematics and this is reflected in their increased confidence in teaching. Rates of progress have increased but are not yet consistently good across all year groups. Some staff have high expectations of pupils. Pupils in Year 4 focused well on a mathematics activity where they were challenged to find lines of symmetry in a range of two-dimensional shapes. They responded well to a further challenge to recognise and explain a pattern between the number of equal sides and the
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
number of lines of symmetry. Phonics (the sounds that letters make) is generally well taught. Sessions are carefully matched to pupils’ skill levels and staff question them appropriately to build on and reinforce learning. As a result, pupils in key stage 1 and children in the early years show growing confidence in identifying letter sounds and applying them in their reading and spelling. Teachers give feedback to pupils so that they know how to improve their work. They apply the school's marking policy consistently well in English and mathematics so that pupils know about their next steps and complete tasks to reinforce their learning. Teaching assistants are deployed effectively to support small groups and individual pupils. They work well with disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs or disability to promote their learning.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils are keen and confident to talk about their school. They typically comment that school is ‘very friendly and like a family’. This is seen in the positive relationships that exist between staff and pupils, and between pupils. Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe. As a result, they show a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe, including when using the internet. They say that they feel safe in school and that there is always an adult to turn to if they have any concerns. Behaviour records indicate that bullying is rare. Pupils say that bullying seldom happens and, if it does, it is dealt with well by staff. They understand what bullying is and the range of different forms it can take. Pupils show pride in their school and enjoy their responsibilities as school councillors, monitors, and eco-
p.4
Personal development and welfare
councillors. They show respect for each other’s viewpoints.
p.4
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Pupils do not consistently settle quickly to their tasks or listen carefully to their teachers, teaching assistants and each other. At times, where teaching does not engage pupils sufficiently, or the expectations of staff are not high enough, pupils drift into off-task behaviour such as fidgeting, talking or not listening to the teacher. Attendance is below average but is showing some sign of improvement as a result of the school’s recent efforts to improve it. Persistent absence is also higher than the national average, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. The school is working hard with families to reduce absence. Pupils generally behave well around the school, at breaks and at lunchtimes. Pupils report that behaviour has improved since the arrival of the new headteacher. Parents say that the school is now a more orderly environment.
p.4
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
The school’s current pupils are now making faster progress than has been the case previously, but they are not yet making good progress in all year groups and subjects. Too few pupils are making more than the expected progress. This is because the quality of teaching is inconsistent. The most able pupils do not always make the progress of which they are capable because teaching lacks challenge. Although improving now, pupils’ attainment at the end of key stages 1 and 2 was below average in 2014 and 2015. In 2015, boys performed notably less well than girls in reading, writing and mathematics. School leaders have taken steps to tackle this issue and gaps have narrowed. However, in some year groups and subjects, outcomes for boys still lag behind those of girls. Lesson observations, checks on the work in pupils’ books and analysis of the school’s information about their progress show that most pupils are now making at least the expected progress from their starting points in
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
reading, writing and mathematics. They are suitably prepared for the next stage of their education. Attainment is improving but remained below average at the end of key stage 2 in 2015. At the end of key stage 1, attainment improved to broadly average in reading, writing and mathematics from 2014. In Year 6 in 2015, the attainment and progress gaps narrowed for disadvantaged pupils. Current assessment information shows that disadvantaged pupils are making progress which is often better than others pupils in the school. Pupils who have special educational needs or disability make similar progress to their peers.
p.5
Early years provision is good
Provision in the early years is good because it is well led and managed and teaching is good. As a result, children quickly gain new skills and knowledge in Nursery and Reception classes and are well prepared to begin Year 1. Children make good progress from starting points which are below those typical for their age. In 2015, the proportion of children achieving a good level of development rose to 75%, which was above the national average. Staff have created a stimulating indoor and outdoor environment in which to promote effective learning. Pupils engaged well in role play on the indoor ‘pirate ship’, made treasure maps, and happily wrote a message in a bottle. Staff question children well to develop their understanding of initial letter sounds. Children behave well, cooperating to play a word-matching game and sitting and listening well during sessions to develop their phonics skills. Children are familiar with the early years routines and show a strong sense of security in their surroundings.
p.5
Early years provision is good
Arrangements to keep children safe are effective. Adults are skilled at developing pupils’ speaking and listening skills. They question children well to encourage them to explain what they are doing and why they are doing it. Children told inspectors about what they will do on board the pirate ship. The early years leader checks children’s progress closely and makes sure any gaps identified are swiftly closed. Where children’s starting points are lower in any area, support is provided to ensure that they catch up. A recent focus on promoting children’s reading, writing and understanding of the world has led to faster progress and raised attainment in these areas. Staff establish positive relationships with parents and encourage them to be involved in their children’s learning. This contributes to children’s good progress.
p.5
School details
Unique reference number 106084 Local authority Stockport Inspection number 10012106
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.6
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 187 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair John Thompson Headteacher Steven Hall Telephone number 0161 480 2142 Website www.whitehill.stockport.sch.uk Email address admin@whitehill.stockport.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 19–20 February 2014
p.6
Information about this school
This is a smaller than the average-sized primary school. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is below the national average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported through the pupil premium is well above the national average. Pupil premium is the additional government funding used to support pupils who are eligible for free school meals or children looked after by the local authority. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs or disability is below average. In 2015, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which set out the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. The school operates a breakfast club for pupils. Since the last inspection, there have been a large number of staff changes. In September 2015, the current headteacher took up post, along with six other new staff members.
p.6
Information about this school
The school meets the requirements for publishing information on its website.
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed learning throughout the school. Two observations were carried out jointly with the headteacher. In addition, inspectors scrutinised pupils’ workbooks and listened to pupils read. Meeting were held with pupils, the chair of the governing body and two other governors, the headteacher and other senior leaders. The inspectors also held a meeting with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors looked at a range of information produced by the school, including information on pupils’ progress and attainment, behaviour and attendance, procedures for safeguarding and the school’s own evaluation of its work. They considered reports to the governing body, minutes of their meetings and the school’s plans for further improvement. Inspectors considered the 18 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, and the views of 13 parents who sent text messages to Ofsted. Inspectors also spoke with some parents as they brought
p.7
Information about this inspection
their children to school. Inspectors also took account of the 20 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. There were no responses to the online pupil questionnaire to consider.
p.7
Inspection team
Elaine White, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector Clare Nash Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.8
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.8
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion