Other · Ofsted report
Catchpoint Consultancy CIC
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Jun 2016
- Inspectors verified
Linda Bond
- Postcode verified
BS16 2QQ
- Name on report verified
Catch-Point Consultancy CIC
- URN verified
SC067034
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The overall effectiveness of this adoption support agency has been judged as good to reflect the outstanding quality of care and excellent outcomes for the majority of families and children using the service. p.3
- The quality of the service provided is outstanding, because families receive packages of support and therapy that are exceptional. p.6
- The service is led by a registered manager who is both inspirational and highly motivated. p.3
- Therapists travel frequently and, in doing so, show an excellent commitment to providing therapeutic sessions to families that do not live locally. p.7
- These are produced to an excellent standard and provide family members with key information, the package of support and a research-informed analysis. p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that the adoption support agency seeks feedback from the service users on the success of the service provision. p.4
- This feedback is recorded centrally and on the case record of the service user (NMS 15.6). p.4
- Ensure that the adoption agency/registered person of the adoption support agency formally approves the statement of purpose and the children's guides, and reviews them at least annually (NMS 18.3). p.4
- Ensure that all people working in, or for the purposes of, the agency, and persons applying to be included on the central list, are interviewed as part of the selection process and have references checked to assess suitability before taking up their duties. p.4
- Telephone enquiries are made to each referrer to verify the written references (NMS 21.1). p.4
- Ensure that the agency can demonstrate, including from written records, that it consistently follows safe recruitment practice, and all applicable statutory p.4
- Ensure that the agency has a record of the recruitment and suitability checks which have been carried out for staff, volunteers and persons on the central list which includes; at least two references, preferably one from a current employer, and where possible a statement from each referee as to their opinion of the person's suitability to work with children (NMS 21.3). p.4
- Ensure that the agency's system for recruiting staff and others includes an effective system for reaching decisions as to who is to be appointed and the circumstances in which an application should be refused, in relation to staff or others, in the light of any criminal convictions or other concerns about suitability that are declared or discovered through the recruitment process (NMS 21.5). p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance10
“The service is led by a registered manager who is both inspirational and highly motivated.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,402
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Catch-Point Consultancy CIC Inspection report for adoption support agency
p.1
Unique reference number SC067034 Inspection date 7 June 2016 Inspector Linda Bond Type of inspection Full
p.1
Setting address Vassell Centre, Gill Avenue, Fishponds, Bristol BS16 2QQ
p.1
Telephone number 0117 9510474 Email info@catchpoint.org Registered person Catch-Point Consultancy CIC Registered manager Frances Hasler Responsible individual Thomas Pyne Date of last inspection 1 October 2014 Website: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
Catch Point Consultancy CIC undertakes a range of therapeutic and assessment work, using a trauma and recovery model with an emphasis on attachment theory. Therapy may be long or short term. The agency provides services to fostered and adopted children and their families. Based in Bristol, the service offers regular therapeutic sessions at their office and at other locations around the country, including Hampshire, Wales and Devon. The service is a not-for-profit community interest company, and is managed by a small team of directors. There are approximately 90 service users, including 60 adoptive families, who are in regular contact with the agency to receive therapy or other forms of support.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Outstanding : a service of exceptional quality that significantly exceeds minimum requirements Good : a service of high quality that exceeds minimum requirements Requires improvement : a service that only meets minimum requirements Inadequate : a service that does not meet minimum requirements
p.3
Overall effectiveness
The overall effectiveness is judged to be good
p.3
Overall effectiveness
The overall effectiveness of this adoption support agency has been judged as good to reflect the outstanding quality of care and excellent outcomes for the majority of families and children using the service. In particular, the distinctive therapeutic models of intervention are reported by parents and social workers as being ’amazing’ and ‘there are tangible results’.
p.3
Overall effectiveness
The agency provides a choice of approaches, including music, art, play, and dance and drama therapy, by a team of highly qualified, professionally accredited and skilled practitioners. As a result, families using this service are assured of receiving support that is current, and underpinned by research and practice, to a very high standard.
p.3
Overall effectiveness
The service is led by a registered manager who is both inspirational and highly motivated. Staff report that they are supported through training and regular supervision to learn from each other and to continue to develop professionally. As a result of the leadership and governance from the directors, the service continues to improve and develop. Minor shortfalls in the overall monitoring and development of the service were identified, and are acknowledged by the manager and staff team. Strategies are already in place to address these.
p.3
Overall effectiveness
Some families and social workers report delays in receiving reports and regular communication. However, these are few and do not impact on the excellent outcomes that families are reporting. These include positive relationships between their child and school, a sense of clarity and belonging, an understanding of attachment and behaviours, and strategies to manage difficult behaviours.
p.3
Overall effectiveness
The manager and staff team understand the importance of reflective practice, and make very good attempts to capture feedback from families and social workers to inform their practice. For example, questionnaires are adapted for children, young people and adults. However, the manager recognises that more attempts need to be made to ensure that families are able to contribute to and influence the development of the service.
p.4
Overall effectiveness
Safeguarding procedures and practice are good. In particular, all staff are trained and knowledgeable about child protection to a high level, which means that the families and children who use the service remain safe. The designated safeguarding lead has implemented previously recognised areas of development in respect of recruitment. However, further shortfalls in respect of references and the interviewing process were identified during the course of the inspection. It is to be acknowledged that these gaps do not place children and families at risk, and the designated safeguarding lead was swift to address them during the course of the inspection.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
Ensure that the adoption support agency seeks feedback from the service users on the success of the service provision. This feedback is recorded centrally and on the case record of the service user (NMS 15.6). Ensure that the adoption agency/registered person of the adoption support agency formally approves the statement of purpose and the children's guides, and reviews them at least annually (NMS 18.3). Ensure that all people working in, or for the purposes of, the agency, and persons applying to be included on the central list, are interviewed as part of the selection process and have references checked to assess suitability before taking up their duties. Telephone enquiries are made to each referrer to verify the written references (NMS 21.1). Ensure that the agency can demonstrate, including from written records, that it consistently follows safe recruitment practice, and all applicable statutory
p.4
Recommendations
requirements and guidance in the recruitment of staff, volunteers and persons on the central list (NMS 22.2). Ensure that the agency has a record of the recruitment and suitability checks which have been carried out for staff, volunteers and persons on the central list which includes; at least two references, preferably one from a current employer, and where possible a statement from each referee as to their opinion of the person's suitability to work with children (NMS 21.3). Ensure that the agency's system for recruiting staff and others includes an effective system for reaching decisions as to who is to be appointed and the circumstances in which an application should be refused, in relation to staff or others, in the light of any criminal convictions or other concerns about suitability that are declared or discovered through the recruitment process (NMS 21.5). Ensure that there are clear and effective procedures for monitoring and
p.4
Recommendations
controlling the activities of the agency. In particular, ensure that areas for improvement are included in the agency's development plan (NMS 25.1).
p.5
users
Outcomes are good because the responses from families, young people and social workers provided during the course of inspection, coupled with the responses to the Ofsted surveys, are exceptionally positive. Families report they are supported, listened to, valued and understood. One parent reported, ‘we would not have survived as a family without the support.’ In particular, as a result of the specific educational support link that the service provides, children experiencing secondary trauma and attachment-related difficulties are progressing well. One ex-service user who is now an adult continues to attend therapy sessions with her younger brothers and sisters. During the course of the inspection, she was able to share her positive experiences and spoke of how these had helped her to progress successfully through school and on to university.
p.6
users
The manager understands the importance of supporting the parents with their children’s education. Liaison with schools is a vital part of the service’s ethos. A skilled and qualified educational consultant has an excellent working relationship with schools. This has resulted in educational staff understanding and managing children better in the school setting, thereby reducing the stresses experienced by the families over school issues.
p.6
users
Families report that the therapists provide ‘invaluable’ support and help, enabling them to remain together as a family. Practical strategies are given that help the parents to manage crisis points and communicate effectively with other professionals. As a result, they say that their children ‘progress well emotionally’ and they are supported during meetings.
p.6
users
Social workers spoken with are extremely complimentary of the service, reporting that families have had extremely positive experiences. By receiving the ‘excellent and supportive therapeutic service’, disruptions to placements are avoided and parents feel empowered by having their confidence enhanced.
p.6
users
The service is, in the main, able to respond quickly to referrals by offering initial consultations, and parents report a sense of relief. However, a number of parents and professionals report a delay in this process and report feeling frustrated. The manager recognises from feedback and consultation that this remains an issue and has been swift to identify strategies to address this concern.
p.6
Quality of service provision
The quality of the service provided is outstanding, because families receive packages of support and therapy that are exceptional. Highly qualified and skilled practitioners ensure through creative and bespoke therapeutic packages that parents and their children are central to the planning and decision-making processes. Parents report consistently that they feel included, valued and respected. By listening and working closely with the family, the service is able to meet their changing needs. For example, different therapists will be introduced at any point to support emerging issues, thereby providing the family with choice and opportunities to work with other therapeutic approaches.
p.6
Quality of service provision
A particular strength of the service is the impressive knowledge and skill base of the registered manager. Parents and social workers who contributed to the inspection process provided overwhelming praise for the manager. The manager, who is also the clinical director, is thoroughly engaged and immersed in research and developments in the field of trauma and recovery. As a result of her dedication to this subject, she is able to lead a staff team that continues to learn and develop. Consequently, families are benefiting from practice that is at the forefront of research into the effects of attachment and trauma.
p.7
Quality of service provision
The service provides support to families across the country. Therapists travel frequently and, in doing so, show an excellent commitment to providing therapeutic sessions to families that do not live locally. As a group of knowledgeable and skilled practitioners, they recognise the need to work with the family, extended members of the family, schools and social workers as a group. The parents report that they feel supported by a network of people. Furthermore, the service is keen to develop additional services for families to access. For example, ‘tea-time training’ would enable parents to engage in training at times that are convenient and accessible.
p.7
Quality of service provision
The manager and core staff conduct detailed assessments and reports on the family’s needs. These are produced to an excellent standard and provide family members with key information, the package of support and a research-informed analysis. While some delay in receiving these documents is reported by parents and social workers, These documents are of an exceptional standard, enabling the reader to be informed and guided. A recommendation related to the management of ensuring these are sent out in a timely fashion has been made based on feedback from some parents and social workers.
p.7
families
The arrangements in place to ensure that children and families are safeguarded are good. In the main, the service practises safe recruitment and the designated safeguarding lead is experienced, knowledgeable and trained in the process of safe recruitment. However, three staff files that were sampled had some minor errors in relation to references that were not correct. Furthermore, while files had sufficient information regarding applications, photo ID and qualifications, there was no evidence of how the decision to recruit the applicant had been reached, and the central register was not up-to-date. The designated safeguarding lead was swift to recognise and address these shortfalls, and children’s and families’ safety was not compromised. Nevertheless, a recommendation is made to make certain that the recruitment procedures are tightened. The service pays particular attention to the training of the staff team. An induction
p.7
families
and probationary period includes an extensive range of face-to-face and online safeguarding training, and a record of DBS checks and mandatory training is held centrally. By doing so, the service is able to ensure that all staff are kept up to date with current safeguarding practices.
p.8
families
The service has systems in place to ensure that all appropriate bodies, including Ofsted, are notified, should a child protection or safeguarding issue come to light. Since the previous inspection there have been no reportable incidents. All policies and procedures are reviewed regularly, and the designated safeguarding lead ensures that local safeguarding boards are liaised with when necessary.
p.8
families
The service has an effective complaints procedure and, since the last inspection, there have been just two complaints received. Both of these reflected the delay in receiving reports and were responded to swiftly by the service.
p.8
Leadership and management
The leadership and management of this service is good. It is led by a registered manager who is highly qualified and skilled in psychotherapy. She has considerable experience in residential work with children, teaching, training and writing, and holds the relevant leadership and management qualifications.
p.8
Leadership and management
Since the previous inspection, the manager and core staff have worked extremely hard during a period of relocating the premises. As a result of this move, children, families and professionals have the use of premises that are centrally located, easily accessible, private, welcoming and safe.
p.8
Leadership and management
Since the previous inspection, the service has experienced a significant period of growth and development in the services that they provide. These include an increased number of therapists, training opportunities for parents and therapeutic interventions. The growth of the service is testament to the skills and expertise of the manager. Overall, there is good monitoring and recording of this growth. Nonetheless, the manager recognises that this data is not effectively captured by the service’s development plan, that feedback from parents and social workers is not being used to influence the development of the service, and neither is there a robust enough succession plan available for the directors. Recommendations for these to be further tightened are therefore made.
p.8
Leadership and management
Parents and social workers spoken with could not speak highly enough of the registered manager’s warmth, skill, expertise and knowledge. In particular, one parent spoke of how the manager gave ‘practical advice and strategies that actually worked’ and how ‘she gets it’.
p.8
Leadership and management
During the period of time that a family is involved with the service, there are very good attempts to consult with parents and children using a range of evaluative questionnaires. However, the service does not yet have a system in place to collate this data centrally. Therefore, a recommendation to develop one is made, and by doing so the service will be able to demonstrate how the views and opinions of service users are used to influence the development of the service.
p.8
Leadership and management
To complement her own skill base and proficiency, the manager has selected a team of therapists and administrators who have an extensive depth of knowledge and qualification, including adoption and fostering expertise. In doing so, the management and core staff team share responsibilities effectively.
p.9
Leadership and management
All staff report that they receive regular supervision that is of an excellent quality. The manager uses this one-to-one time with staff to identify opportunities for them to continue to develop professionally and to ensure that their professional registrations are kept up to date.
p.9
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.10
About this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the inspection framework and the evaluation schedule for the inspection of adoption support agencies.
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion