Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Mount Carmel Preschool

Inspected 20 May 2016 · URN 135325

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Lesley Hodges

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Miriam Fernandez

  • Group reference verified

    RP906375

  • Inspection date verified

    20 May 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Lesley Hodges

  • Early years verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    EN2 6DS

  • Name on report verified

    Mount Carmel Preschool

  • URN verified

    135325

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+32Mostly positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoyconsistentlygood progresssuccessfullyeffectiveskilledclear
Criticismnot effectiveinconsistenciesconcernsnot consistentlynot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings47w0
  • What needs to improve655w+32

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
664
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

Mount Carmel Preschool 45 London Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN2 6DS

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 20 May 2016 5 July 2013

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Systems for identifying where staff need to develop their skills and knowledge are not effective. The manager meets regularly with staff and identifies where they would benefit from specific training but does not take action to provide this. Inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and the management of children's behaviour negatively impact on the children's learning and development.  Staff do not take advantage of opportunities to teach children about the benefits of a healthy diet.  The manager does not evaluate the quality of the provision effectively to set and address clear targets for improvement.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff track children's progress appropriately and work in partnership with parents to agree the next steps in children's learning.  Children enjoy small group activities and staff develop their interest in writing and mathematics well.  Staff arrange equipment well so that children can make choices about what they want to play with.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the arrangements to support the professional development of staff, to continue to raise the quality of teaching to a consistently high level 01/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 support all staff to manage behaviour in a consistent way that enables children to learn what is expected of them. 01/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 provide more opportunities to develop children's awareness and understanding of the benefits of a healthy diet  use self-evaluation more effectively to identify and address areas for improvement.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector carried out a joint observation of an activity with the manager.  The inspector spoke with children, parents, staff and the manager at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector sampled documentation, including staff records and children's development folders.  The inspector observed activities in all areas of the setting to assess the quality of teaching.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Since the last inspection, the manager has made some improvements to practice. For example, she has successfully introduced activities that challenge older children. However, although she has introduced a system of supervision meetings for staff, these do not focus precisely enough on how to consistently raise the quality of teaching. Safeguarding is effective. Staff have a secure understanding of their role in safeguarding children. For example, the know how to identify the signs and symptoms that may indicate concerns about a child's welfare.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Children enjoy their time at the setting but do not all engage as well as possible in activities. Children's learning is sometimes interrupted by unwanted behaviour, and some staff are more skilled than others at extending children's learning during activities. Staff provide a varied selection of resources for children to choose from. For example, children use role play resources imaginatively as they go on 'shopping trips' with dolls and prams. Overall, staff monitor effectively to ensure that children make steady progress. For example, they gather information from parents about what children enjoy doing at home and use this information, and their own observations, to plan suitable experiences for children. Staff regularly share information about children's progress with parents.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Staff help children to settle into the pre-school. For example, they gather key words in the home languages of children who speak English as an additional language. Staff take steps to promote children's good health. For example, children regularly play outdoors in the fresh air and staff provide different fruits for them to try. However, staff miss opportunities to develop children's knowledge of the benefits of a healthy diet. Children learn to be independent, such as helping themselves to drinks. During free play, children generally interact cooperatively. However, staff do not consistently support children's good behaviour at all times. For example, some staff do not support children to learn how to solve minor disagreements themselves. Furthermore, staff do not manage children's behaviour appropriately during large group sessions, and some children quickly lose interest in planned activities.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children make progress in line with the expected levels for their ages, overall. Older children make some good progress as they take an early interest in literacy and mathematics. For example, they learn to write their names and recognise numbers, and these skills help to prepare them for the move to school. Children make choices and show that they can develop friendships with other children.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 135325 Local authority Enfield Inspection number 1028752 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 18 Name of registered person Miriam Fernandez

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 5 July 2013 Telephone number 020 8363 1911

p.4

reference number

Mount Carmel Pre-School registered in 1989. It is located in Enfield, in the London Borough of Enfield. The pre-school is open on Monday, Tuesday and Friday, term time only. Sessions are from 9am to midday. The pre-school employs four staff; of these, two hold appropriate early years qualifications, one at level 3 and one at level 2. The pre- school receives funding to provide free early education for children aged three and four years.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion