Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Blessed John Henry Newman Roman Catholic College

Inspected 12 May 2016 · published 8 Jun 2016 · URN 136432

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 May 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    John Leigh, Marcia Harding, Philip Hyman, Sally Kenyon, Timothy Long

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OL9 9QY

  • Name on report verified

    Blessed John Henry Newman RC College

  • URN verified

    136432

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh-qualitymake good progresshighly effectiveimprovedvery wellhigh expectationseffectively
Criticismnot alwaysgapsfailedrequires improvementnot consistentlylacksdisruptionweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1649w+62
  • Leadership515w+62
  • What needs to improve107w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
2,213
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Blessed John Henry Newman RC College Broadway, Chadderton, Oldham, Greater Manchester OL9 9QY

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

This is a good school

 The headteacher and his team have created a very positive ‘can do’ climate for learning. There are no excuses. Teachers instil confidence in pupils so they are unafraid to have a go or make mistakes. This has led to improved outcomes in learning.  Teaching has rapidly improved since the previous inspection due to bespoke, supportive professional development. There is some very high-quality teaching. Teachers are just as keen to share their mistakes as their successes so that they can collectively improve. This is a fine example to set for the pupils.  Pupils make good progress in English, humanities and across a range of subjects. Progress in mathematics is good for the majority of pupils and improving.  Behaviour is good and very well managed. A number of pupils come to the school having failed to succeed elsewhere and are now rightly proud of their improved behaviour and academic success.  Attendance is above average and improving for all

p.1

This is a good school

groups as a result of forensic monitoring.  Governance is strong. Members of the governing body are well versed in good governance; they have strong professional expertise and a good understanding of education. Finances are well managed.  This is a highly inclusive school. Parents and pupils are full of praise for the lengths pastoral staff and teachers go to in order to help pupils overcome difficulties with their learning or behaviour.  Pupils have high aspirations and many express the wish to go on to university. Similarly, a number of pupils leave the school and go on to successful apprenticeships with local businesses.  Performance management has been used highly effectively to tackle not just teaching but professional behaviour that does not meet the high standards expected by the headteacher.  The overwhelming majority of parents are enthusiastic in their praise for the school.  The curriculum is well organised and has been

p.1

This is a good school

well adjusted to meet new national expectations.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 A very small minority of staff do not always apply the school’s rigorous policies consistently. In a small minority of cases, behaviour management and assessment do not live up to the high standards set by the vast majority of teachers.  The accuracy and structure of writing across the curriculum is not always as good as it is in English.  The most-able pupils are not consistently stretched by the curriculum in mathematics.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of written work across the curriculum by:  focusing upon structure and grammatical accuracy  ensuring that pupils always have appropriate guidance to check their work.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Continue to improve outcomes in mathematics, particularly for the most able, by:  increasing stretch and challenge in lessons  reviewing long-term lesson planning and making plans available to parents  closing remaining gaps between the outcomes of disadvantaged pupils and their peers.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all staff apply school policies consistently.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Enhance teaching in the personal, social, health, citizenship and sex and relationships curriculum so that pupils can discuss these topics in greater depth.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management is good

 High expectations, determination and drive characterise the senior leadership team. Leaders and managers are highly visible and know the pupils well. This is an unexpectedly close-knit community for such a large school.  At the time of the previous inspection, school leaders were asked to improve the quality of teaching and share good practice more widely. Teaching has not just changed; it has been transformed.  Very well-focused staff development has brought about rapid improvements in teaching. These improvements are driving up standards and have significantly lowered the proportion of pupils who are temporarily excluded from lessons or the school.  Middle leaders feel empowered by their new responsibilities and have brought greater scrutiny upon themselves and their departments. They are held to account by senior leaders but the focus of the relationship with senior leaders is rightly about developing middle leaders’ skills.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management is good

 There is a significant focus upon equalities; leaders and managers monitor closely the achievement, attendance and behaviour of pupils by gender, disadvantage and ethnicity and take action if inequalities emerge. For example, a number of pupils who have made multiple visits to the internal exclusion room take part in therapeutic work to discuss their difficulties and to set small but achievable targets to improve.  Historically, the curriculum has hampered achievement. However, it has been overhauled to ensure that pupils make much better progress. Pupils who wish to take part in extra-curricular activities have a wide choice, including choir, army cadet force, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme and many sporting opportunities.  Social, moral, spiritual and cultural education is promoted well across subjects and last year pupils raised over £10,000 for local, national and international charities. Pupils appreciate the impartial careers advice,

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management is good

education and guidance they receive and many Year 11 pupils speak confidently about their career paths to university, employment and apprenticeships.  While there are good examples of personal, social and health education, sex and relationships education and citizenship being taught, the programme overall is disparate and lacks impact.  Pupil premium funds are spent wisely on intervention work to help pupils ‘catch-up’ with reading, writing and mathematics or socially and emotionally.  The governance of the school  Members of the governing body are highly committed and give generously of their time.  Minutes of governors’ meetings show that governors regularly and effectively hold senior leaders to account. They make it their business to know the school well and collectively they have a broad range of educational and professional expertise which they use to good effect.  They know that the quality of teaching in school is good because they regularly visit and speak with

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management is good

pupils. They manage the school finances well and understand the impact of the vast sum the school receives to help pupils eligible for the pupil premium.  They link to different departments and are keeping a close eye on mathematics after the dip in results last year.  The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Child protection referrals are followed up in a timely manner and much highly effective multi-agency work takes place.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

 There is a buzz around teaching. Teachers skilfully guide pupils to make good and better progress in all manner of different styles and techniques.  Typically, teachers greet pupils at the door and by their very presence make clear the expectations for the lesson. Classroom routines are well established and ensure that valuable learning time is not lost; pupils are keen to help give out books, everyone knows where they sit and learning starts promptly.  Teachers and pupils are clear what they are learning and why. Many teachers ooze subject knowledge and pupils readily absorb and retain what they have learnt. They speak confidently about their knowledge and handle difficult questions with ease. They can apply their learning to show that they have properly understood.  Some exemplary practice was seen in a Year 10 art lesson. Pupils showed off their highly honed drawing skills with a focus upon Indian culture. Pupils spoke with confidence and pride about their work. Similarly

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

strong practice was seen in a Year 8 physical education lesson, pupils were coaching each other on sprinting techniques. Pupils made rapid progress due to well-established routines and strong coaching skills.  The quality of teaching in mathematics is improving. This work is complemented by support from other schools. Year 7 pupils were observed at times struggling to work out what they had been given. However, improved learning resulted because pupils were encouraged to collaborate and to show their workings, rather than whether the answer was simply right or wrong. ‘Exit tickets’ from the teacher tell pupils exactly what they need to start with next lesson and help direct their learning to address gaps in skills and knowledge. However, this high-quality teaching is not yet consistent across the department and some pupils spend time completing work that is too easy or repetitive.  Scrutiny of books show that work is well presented. Most of the time marking is really helpful and pupils

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

make better progress as a result of responding to the teacher’s feedback. However, there are occasions when marking is cursory and does not meet the high standards set by leaders. The quality of writing is sometimes extremely high, but when pupils are writing at length across the curriculum their grammar and the structure of their writing are not always to the same high standard.  Social, moral, spiritual and cultural education is promoted well in many lessons. In a Year 9 history lesson, pupils confidently articulated the clash of culture between native Americans and immigrants and related it to similar situations in modern life.

p.4

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupil’s personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils say they feel safe in school; parents and inspectors agree. There is a highly organised pastoral support team who work strategically to help pupils who are experiencing difficulties at home or school.  Pupils know that using derogatory language is wrong. They know how to stay safe online and there are strict reprimands for any pupils found to be using mobile phones in school.  The school works well to build pupils’ confidence in learning and works closely with individuals and their parents to help them overcome difficulties. One parent said that the school ‘has changed my child’s life’ by the high level of care and support.  Pupils report that there are occasions when bullying takes place and it is usually in the form of name calling and derogatory language. Inspectors found that instances of bullying were documented and dealt

p.4

Personal development and welfare

with effectively.  However, a very small minority of younger pupils felt that not all staff would listen to their concerns about bullying or deal with derogatory language in the same way. The school’s policy is very clear on what staff should do but there are clearly a few staff who do not implement the school’s policies consistently.

p.4

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. The vast majority of pupils show a high level of respect for their fellow pupils and their teachers. It is not uncommon for an adult to enter a classroom unnoticed by the pupils because they are so engrossed in their work.  Behaviour is well managed. The pastoral team is strong due to high-quality leadership at all levels. They know pupils well and set the standard by their own highly professional behaviour, dress code and conduct.  Most parents who responded to Parent View feel that behaviour is good and almost all parents spoken to during the inspection had no concerns over behaviour and were very pleased with the school.  Typically, pupils behave well in lessons and at social times, they queue in an orderly manner for lunch and are polite and well mannered to lunchtime supervisors. Bus drivers say that pupils behave well on the buses and though inspectors saw, in school records, reference to the odd occasion when this had not

p.4

Behaviour

been the case, the school had dealt with the behaviour severely and in line with their policies.  The number of pupils leaving classrooms because their behaviour does not meet the school’s high expectations has dramatically decreased, along with the number of fixed-term exclusions.  Attendance is above the national average overall and close to the national average for all groups. The work of the attendance team is highly effective and making a strong contribution to improving pupil progress.

p.4

Outcomes for pupils are good

 Pupils make good progress due to high-quality, engaging teaching and learning. Attainment on entry for this year’s Year 11 is slightly below the national average, but pupils are set to leave with results in line with those expected nationally. This is despite the fact that they have experienced significant disruption to their secondary school careers, as they had to move to this school from two predecessor schools in Year 8.  The school is accommodating on average 60 in-year admissions each academic year. Some of these pupils have been permanently excluded from other schools and some arrive from overseas with little or no grasp of English. However, their progress is rigorously tracked from their starting points and they are making the same good progress as their peers.  Pupils who have special educational needs or disability make good progress. Parents praised teachers for their diligence in diagnosing pupils with special educational needs and for quickly and effectively

p.5

Outcomes for pupils are good

supporting them to overcome barriers to learning.  The most-able pupils make good progress in many subjects and are set to do particularly well in single science examinations this year. However, not enough pupils make better than expected progress in mathematics as they are not always challenged enough in their lessons, particularly in key stage 3.  Gaps remain between disadvantaged pupils and their peers in mathematics yet they are closing in many others subjects, including English. Gaps are narrowing most rapidly at key stage 3 due to well-focused work with pupils who have weaker reading and writing skills on entry to the school. Pupils in year 10 and year 7 have benefited from a ‘paired reading’ scheme.  Pupils are very well prepared for the next stage of their education, employment or training. This is because the curriculum is now well suited to meet the very diverse range of abilities and to accommodate

p.5

Outcomes for pupils are good

a similar spectrum of social and emotional learning needs.

p.5

School details

Unique reference number 136432 Local authority Oldham Inspection number 10012207

p.6

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.6

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1,423 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Father Eugene Dolan Headteacher Mr Michael McGhee Telephone number 0161 785 8858 Website www.newmanrc.oldham.sch.uk Email address admin@newmanrc.oldham.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 14–15 May 2014

p.6

Information about this school

 This is a much larger than average-sized school.  Since the previous inspection the sixth form has closed.  The school is in a soft federation with 11 local catholic primary schools.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils who are eligible for support through the pupil premium is well above the national average. The pupil premium is additional funding provided by the government to support pupils eligible for free school meals and looked after children.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups or who speak English as an additional language is high.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs or disability is slightly below the national average.  There are, on average, 60 pupils who join the school at different times throughout the year. Some of these pupils have been excluded from other schools, some are new to the country and some have only a basic grasp of English.

p.6

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum expectation for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 11.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed pupils in lessons and during social times. They scrutinised documentation pertaining to current achievement, self-evaluation, performance management and school improvement. They looked at minutes governing body meetings, financial information, current attendance and behaviour information and documentation relating to safeguarding.  Inspectors held discussions with over 100 pupils, parents, members of the governing body, the chaplain, senior leaders, middle leaders, lunchtime supervisors and bus drivers. They took account of 88 responses to the staff questionnaire and 234 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire.

p.7

Inspection team

Sally Kenyon, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Timothy Long Ofsted Inspector Marcia Harding Ofsted Inspector John Leigh Philip Hyman Ofsted Inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.8

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.8

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.8

Inspection team

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion