Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
West Gate School
Summary
Derek Myers (lead), Jennifer Digges, Phil Harrison
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Apr 2016
- Inspectors verified
Derek Myers, Jennifer Digges, Phil Harrison
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Good
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LE3 6DG
- Name on report verified
West Gate School
- URN verified
131099
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- 16 to 19 study programmesGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers maintain high expectations of all children and, as a result, evidence in work files and tracking information shows that children make good progress from their starting points. p.6
- 16 to 19 provision is good because leaders and staff have high expectations and, as a result, students leave the school well prepared for the future. p.1
- The new headteacher has made a positive start to her role and is quickly getting a clear view of the school and ways in which it can be improved. p.1
- Students engage positively with the provision and make good progress from their starting points. p.6
- Pupils are proud of their school and talk about a number of aspects of school that they particularly enjoy, such as food, sport or playtimes. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement p.1
- Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement p.1
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement p.1
- Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement p.1
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good p.1
- Leadership and management require improvement because leaders and governors have not successfully communicated their vision for the school to all staff. p.1
- Leaders and governors have not effectively monitored the quality of education provided by the school. p.1
- They do not have a clear enough understanding of the performance of the school and have not consistently held staff to account. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 3,062
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
West Gate School Glenfield Road, Leicester, Leicestershire LE3 6DG
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
Leadership and management require improvement because leaders and governors have not successfully communicated their vision for the school to all staff. Leaders and governors have not effectively monitored the quality of education provided by the school. They do not have a clear enough understanding of the performance of the school and have not consistently held staff to account. The governing body has not fulfilled its statutory duties with regard to the education of children looked after. Teaching requires improvement because it is inconsistent across the school. In some classes, teachers make insufficient use of information about pupils to plan learning effectively and to use time efficiently. Behaviour requires improvement because in some cases management of the most challenging behaviours is not well planned and staff have too few options available to them. Communication with parents requires
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
improvement because leaders do not always respond well to parents’ queries.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The new headteacher has made a positive start to her role and is quickly getting a clear view of the school and ways in which it can be improved. 16 to 19 provision is good because leaders and staff have high expectations and, as a result, students leave the school well prepared for the future. Early years provision is good because leaders and teachers know the children well and ensure that learning is both engaging and matched to the children’s needs and abilities. Personal development of pupils is good. Staff know the pupils well and provide effective support and guidance.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by: clarifying roles and responsibilities at all levels revising monitoring processes so that leaders and governors have an accurate view of standards and performance of all aspects of the school’s work ensuring that there are clear plans, strategically and operationally, that enable leaders and governors to improve the school ensuring that governors hold leaders to account for the standards achieved by the school ensuring that governors fulfil their statutory duties for the education of children looked after. Improve teaching by ensuring that: assessment information for all subjects is accurate and is used to inform learning information from statements of special educational needs or education, health and care plans is also used to inform learning the quality of teaching is evaluated against the progress that pupils make towards accurate and challenging targets time is used effectively for learning.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve behaviour by: ensuring that the school behaviour policy is consistently applied clarifying the roles and responsibilities of leaders at all levels for behaviour management ensuring that behaviour plans are thoroughly considered and contain a range of well thought out options for managing the most challenging behaviours.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Leadership and management require improvement because over the past academic year leaders have not clearly articulated their vision for the school to parents and staff. As a result, a small minority of parents do not believe that the school provides valuable information or responds well to concerns. Leadership and management require improvement because leaders and governors have not sustained a culture in which all staff believe in what leaders are trying to achieve. As a result, a minority of staff do not believe that leaders engender a climate of trust, and a small minority do not feel that leaders motivate them. Leaders’ implementation of management systems and processes has been inconsistent. Consequently, leaders and governors do not have a clear and accurate understanding of the effectiveness of the school. The systems and processes that leaders use to manage the performance of staff are appropriate.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
However, they have not resulted in consistently high standards of teaching because they have not been rigorously implemented. Overall, by the time pupils leave West Gate School, they are well prepared for life in modern Britain. However, because of inconsistencies in teaching, not all pupils are well prepared for key stages 2, 3 or 4. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Leaders provide pupils with a wide range of opportunities including English, mathematics, geography, history, religious education (RE) and science in addition to technical, social, artistic and physical learning. However, the curriculum in key stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 is confused between meeting the needs of individual pupils and the frameworks that leaders have put in place. Leaders have ensured that social education is strong, and this is reflected in the positive relationships evident in most classes and around school. Leaders recognise that moral, cultural and spiritual education
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
is less well developed, with limited evidence in pupils’ work, in classes, around school or in school documentation and guidance. Consequently, they have audited the provision, prior to planning improvements. Leaders have issued some guidance on British values, and some elements are evident in teachers’ planning. However, leaders have yet to evaluate the provision and the impact. Leaders can show how they have used pupil premium and Year 7 catch-up premium. They have used additional funding to provide reading resources and music therapy. However, leaders have not evaluated the impact of the funding on pupils’ outcomes. Leaders have used physical education (PE) and sports funding to enable 186 pupils to participate in specialist coaching sessions. This contributed to the school achieving the School Games Mark Gold Award. However, leaders were not able to show that the funding had resulted in improved sport and PE for all
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
pupils. The new headteacher has made a positive start and over her first two weeks is developing an accurate view of the school. Middle leaders are keen and willing. However, they are having a limited impact because their roles lack clarity and they do not know what they are accountable for. The governance of the school The governance of the school requires improvement because governors have not been successful in communicating their vision for the school to staff and parents. As a result, a small minority of staff do not feel motivated or supported, and a small minority of parents have an issue with school communication. For a range of reasons, this has been a challenging year for governors and school leaders. Governors were supportive of the acting headteacher in the autumn and spring terms this year and supported her in effectively addressing the significant challenges that she was presented with. Overall, governors
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
are not sufficiently or appropriately challenging school leaders. As a result, leadership and management of the school have been inconsistent and have lacked a focus on continually improving standards of teaching and learning. The role of governors in the strategic planning for the school has been limited. As a result, they have not been able to support leaders and managers to effectively drive up standards and improve pupil outcomes over this academic year. Governors have not fulfilled their statutory duties with regard to the education of children looked after. The duties include appointing a qualified teacher as the school designated teacher for children looked after, ensuring that the designated teacher has undertaken suitable training, and considering an annual report from the designated teacher on the education of children looked after attending West Gate School. Governors understand their role in the performance management of staff and of the headteacher, and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
are clear about how it relates to pay awards. However, they have not applied this knowledge to challenge and support leaders to use performance management to drive up standards. Following support from the local authority, governors have a better understanding of the effectiveness of the school than previously. However, they still do not know the school well and, as a result, have not been able to hold leaders to account. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. All parents who spoke with inspectors and most parents who responded to Parent View stated that their child felt safe at West Gate School. There is a designated safeguarding governor, and leaders have ensured that, in addition to the designated lead for safeguarding, six school leaders have completed the designated leads’ safeguarding training. Staff have also received safeguarding training this academic year, including the ‘Prevent’ duty
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
guidance on combatting extremism. Staff take their safeguarding responsibilities seriously. They know what they are looking for and know what to do should they have any concerns. School staff have effective relationships with outside agencies, including the local authority designated officer who said that the school’s response to safeguarding concerns have been effective. The record-keeping systems employed are secure and comprehensive. However, they do not include a mechanism to remind staff to chase outside agencies for outstanding actions. Inspectors were aware during this inspection that a serious incident that occurred at the school since the previous inspection is under investigation by the appropriate authorities. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate incidents of this kind, actions taken by the setting in response to the incident were considered, where appropriate, alongside the other evidence available at the time of the inspection, to
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement because it is inconsistent between classes. In some classes, teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are too low. Where teaching is good, teachers have high expectations of the pupils and adults. They use information about the pupils, including academic performance information, to plan learning that meets pupils’ needs. In addition, where teaching is strong, adults use questioning effectively to move pupils on in their learning and to involve the pupils in the feedback process. Where teaching is not yet good, academic assessment information is not always accurate and, as a result, teachers do not provide pupils with appropriately challenging learning activities. Similarly, where teaching is not good, teachers do not use the information contained in pupils’ statements and education, health and care plans effectively to plan the next steps in pupils’ learning. As a result, activities do not always
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
engage pupils in their learning. In addition, where teaching is not good, teachers and support staff do not use time sufficiently well, and too often teachers do not plan enough challenging activities to maximise pupils’ learning. Leaders’ expectations of how teachers plan and deliver lessons and assess pupils’ progress are not clear, and they do not monitor effectively. This has led to an inconsistency of approach, which results in inconsistent progress. In some cases, teachers do not manage pupils’ behaviour effectively enough and, as a result, pupils’ learning is disrupted. The majority of parents believe that the school provides them with useful information, but a minority do not believe that they receive enough information about how their children are progressing at school.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Staff know the pupils well and are well placed to provide additional support and guidance. Teachers ensure that the personal development of pupils is well focused through a single-page profile available for each pupil. The school uses person-centred reviews to ensure that next steps in their education, employment and care are planned with the pupil, their families and partner agencies. This has led to raised expectations of pupils and their future opportunities. Pupils are proud of their school and talk about a number of aspects of school that they particularly enjoy, such as food, sport or playtimes. They also talk positively about their achievements and targets. However, they did not share any enthusiasm for or enjoyment of learning. Pupils get on well together and there is evidence around school in lessons and at break times that the
p.5
Personal development and welfare
social aspects of education are strong at West Gate School. Overall, emotional well-being and physical well-being are clearly positive for most pupils and enhanced for some. However, a very small minority of pupils are stressed by what is expected of them and this has an impact on their well-being. A large majority of staff and parents believe that pupils are well cared for and safe. No parents or staff reported any concerns to the inspectors.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement because behaviour management is not consistent. Leaders have not monitored the implementation and impact of the behaviour policy, including behaviour management planning for pupils with challenging behaviours. Consequently, staff have not always prepared sufficiently well for those pupils with more challenging behaviour. As a result, in some cases, when faced by challenging behaviour, staff and leaders appear to have run out of options. For example, the use of safe spaces was inappropriate and insufficiently considered. This inconsistency in the management of behaviour by leaders and teachers was reflected in the views of staff, of which a small minority do not believe that leaders support them with pupils’ behaviour. Leaders have ensured that staff are trained in an approach to de-escalating behaviour, physical interventions and behaviour management. However, they have not evaluated the impact that this has
p.5
Behaviour
had on the quality of planning and the management of pupils with challenging behaviours. There was little evidence that advice and support from staff trained in this approach was supporting colleagues with their behaviour management planning or improving outcomes for pupils. Pupils’ attitudes to learning are mixed. Where pupils are engaged in their learning, staff have an enthusiasm for what they are teaching, and the pupils can see the purpose to the learning. Attendance of pupils at West Gate School is above the national average for special schools. Overall exclusions are below the national average and the national average for special schools.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
Outcomes for pupils are not yet good because leaders are not able to demonstrate that pupils in all year groups and across a wide range of subjects make consistently strong progress from their starting points. Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are not yet good because leaders are not able to demonstrate that these pupils make good progress in a wide range of subjects. However, the school’s performance information suggests that pupils in receipt of pupil premium achieve better than their peers in English and mathematics. Outcomes are not yet good because leaders have not ensured that there is a clear link between a pupil’s individual targets, drawn from a statement or education, care and health plan, and the day-to-day experience of pupils at school. This is compounded by the inconsistent application of target setting by different teachers. Some targets are vague and are not easily understood by adults or pupils.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
The information held by the school about pupils’ progress suggests that in key stages 2, 3 and 4 pupils achieve well in English, mathematics and personal, social and health education. However, inspectors found that, despite moderation of assessments, some of this information was not accurate, and therefore inspectors could not be assured that outcomes were good. Those pupils who can access reading with appropriate resources say that they enjoy reading. Pupils are generally well prepared for the next stage of their education, employment or training because the person-centred review process enables pupils, parents and staff to establish a clear route to the next stage.
p.5
Early years provision is good
Leaders and managers have a detailed and accurate view of children’s needs. They ensure that activities are both engaging and appropriately matched to the children’s individual needs and abilities. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good. The teaching and learning leader has a good understanding of all aspects of assessment and uses this well to plan for developments in all areas of learning, including phonics. Teachers maintain high expectations of all children and, as a result, evidence in work files and tracking information shows that children make good progress from their starting points. The learning that adults provide for the children encourages them to make independent choices and prepares them well for the next stage of their school life. Provision for all aspects of social development is particularly strong. Behaviour is good and, when needed, adults use effective strategies to refocus and engage children in
p.6
Early years provision is good
their learning. Partnerships with parents are strong, and parents frequently come into class at the beginning and end of the day. Home-school diaries are used daily to good effect, and in one class the day’s activities are recorded on the board to share with parents at the end of the day. Safeguarding is effective.
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes are good
16 to 19 provision is well led and managed, and the school fulfils the requirements of the Department for Education 16 to 19 study programme. As a result, students leaving the provision move on to meaningful destinations such as Leicester College or social care packages of support. They are well prepared for their future. Leaders have high expectations of the students and ensure that the students receive a personalised curriculum that challenges them, for example as seen in the sex education lesson in which students were observed responding maturely to the learning activity. Leaders know what is being taught and what each student is learning. All students are in education, care or training. Students engage positively with the provision and make good progress from their starting points. Some 16 to 19 students respond well to being at the learning centre at New College Leicester. Their behaviours for learning are improved in this environment.
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes are good
English and mathematics are well taught through regular functional skills sessions linked to real life scenarios and through discrete lessons. Leaders ensure that students’ work experiences are also suitably challenging and meet the needs of students. For example, students gain work experience with employers such as Halfords or Marriott hotels, or charities such as The Salvation Army. Leaders ensure equality of opportunity by providing students who experience difficulties with work experience with additional school or class responsibilities. Leaders also ensure that students receive appropriate information, guidance and advice about their future education, training or employment through effective person-centred reviews. As a result, students all have positive destinations to look forward to. For example, some students have accessed GCSE courses at New College Leicester. Once students have left the provision, the rates of retention in their new locations
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes are good
are strong. Teachers ensure that students’ learning is informed by assessment information, such as functional skills assessment, and their identified needs. This is clearly recorded in their individual education plans, which are effectively used by staff to ensure that the provision meets the students’ needs. Similarly, staff expect some students at the New College site to get themselves ready to learn.
p.6
School details
Unique reference number 131099 Local authority Leicester Inspection number 10005505 This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.7
School details
Type of school All-through special School category Maintained Age range of pupils 4 to 19 Gender of pupils Mixed
p.7
programmes
Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rev Canon Peter Taylor Headteacher Denise Williams Telephone number 0116 255 2187 Website www.westgate.leicester.sch.uk/ Email address dwilliams@westgate.leicester.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 18–19 April 2013
p.7
Information about this school
The new headteacher took up post two weeks ago. Prior to this, the deputy headteacher, following the resignation of the previous headteacher, had led the school. West Gate School is a maintained special school for pupils with moderate learning difficulties, severe learning difficulties, complex needs, profound and multiple learning difficulties and autistic spectrum disorders. All pupils have an education health and care plan or a statement of special educational needs. There are 196 pupils aged between four and 19 years of age. Approximately 1.5% of pupils are in the early years. Approximately half of the pupils are White British and a greater than average proportion of pupils are from minority ethnic groups. A greater than average proportion of pupils receive free school meals. The school is a member of the Well Trust and is an accredited provision by the National Autistic Society. The school is located on two sites in Leicester. Pupils from Year R to Year 11 are located on the
p.7
Information about this school
Glenfield Road site, and students in post-16 provision attend the learning centre at the New College site where they can access courses at the college.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited both of the sites. Inspectors observed 15 lessons or parts of lessons mostly with senior leaders. Inspectors also accompanied the headteacher on walks around the school and looked at short periods of learning in classrooms. Inspectors talked to pupils about their learning and listened to pupils read. Inspectors held meetings with school leaders, teachers, support staff and governors. Inspectors considered parents’ views, including 20 responses to the online Ofsted questionnaire, Parent View. The lead inspector met with the local authority raising achievement partner who is currently working with the school. The inspectors listened to the views of staff and evaluated 52 responses to the Ofsted staff survey. The inspectors looked at a range of documentation including the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plan, and education, health and care plans.
p.8
Inspection team
Derek Myers, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Phil Harrison Her Majesty’s Inspector Jennifer Digges Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.9
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.9
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion