Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Fonjock's Social Work Practice Limited in Suffolk
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Apr 2016
- Inspectors verified
Rosie Davie
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Postcode verified
IP33 3PQ
- URN verified
SC487702
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person must comply with the given timescales. p.4
- The registered provider must appoint a person to manage the children’s home if there is no registered manager in respect of the home. p.4
- The registered person must notify HMCI without delay if an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child, which the registered person considers to be serious, with specific reference to children arrested from the home because of behaviours in the home. p.4
- Ensure that the location risk assessment includes the identification of any risks and opportunities presented by the home’s location, and strategies for managing these, with specific reference to the play park in front of the home and the opportunities for access to the main road from the back door. p.5
- Ensure that all staff understand the factors that affect children’s motivation to behave in a socially acceptable way. p.5
- Staff should ensure that each child understands the home’s procedures and policies for respecting their confidentiality, with specific reference to the use of the office. p.5
- The processes that the registered person puts in place to enable a review of the quality of care (Regulation 45), should allow for a report to be generated at least once every six months. p.5
- The generated report should be sent to Ofsted and the placing authorities of all children in the home who are children looked after. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety5
“Placement plans and risk assessments are clear.” p.3Teaching & assessment4
“Placement plans and risk assessments are clear.” p.3Care & placements4
“Placement plans and risk assessments are clear.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 13
- Words of findings
- 1,393
- about usual (typical 1319)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 51
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Good
The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.2
The children’s home provision is good because:
The responsible individual, who is the director and co-founder of the organisation, spends much time in the home. In a short time, children’s patterns of offending reduce. Children at risk of exploitation accept help. Children rarely go missing, representing a significant improvement for those individuals. Children who have not been involved with education for significant lengths of time receive and accept help to engage with some learning or work experience. Children maintain regular contact with families and those who are important to them. One child represented said that he likes the home and feels safe. Staff work well with other agencies, who say communication is good and effective. Placement plans and risk assessments are clear. The information held demonstrates that plans are individualised. Staff attend regular team meetings, have access to training, and receive regular supervision.
p.3
The children’s home provision is good because:
The manager has left and this means that the home is without a registered manager. Staff and the responsible individual make clear records of incidents in the home. On one occasion there was a serious event, but this was not shared with Ofsted. The home does not have the required register of children. The location risk assessment should be more specific. All staff should encourage an enthusiasm for positive behaviour and relevant recording should reflect this. The arrangements for consistently promoting confidentiality in the office require a rethink. The Regulation 45 report is due for completion and submission to Ofsted.
p.3
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered provider must appoint a person to manage the children’s home if there is no registered manager in respect of the home. (Regulation 27(1)(a)) 29 July 2016
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered person must notify HMCI without delay if an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child, which the registered person considers to be serious, with specific reference to children arrested from the home because of behaviours in the home. (Regulation 40 (4) (b)) 20 May 2016
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered person must maintain in the home a record in the form of a register showing in respect of each child: (a) the date of the child’s admission to the children’s home (b) the date on which the child ceased to be accommodated in the home (c) the child’s address immediately before being accommodated in the home (d) the child’s address on leaving the home (e) the child’s placing authority (f) the statutory provision (if any) under which the child is accommodated. (Regulation 37, Schedule 4 (1)) 20 May 2016
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendations: Ensure that the location risk assessment includes the identification of any risks and opportunities presented by the home’s location, and strategies for managing these, with specific reference to the play park in front of the home and the opportunities for access to the main road from the back door. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 64, paragraph 15.1)
p.5
Recommendations
Ensure that all staff understand the factors that affect children’s motivation to behave in a socially acceptable way. All staff should encourage an enthusiasm for positive behaviour through the use of positive behaviour strategies, in line with the child’s relevant plans, and ensure that strategies used are recorded to evidence their effectiveness. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 39, paragraph 8.13)
p.5
Recommendations
Staff should ensure that each child understands the home’s procedures and policies for respecting their confidentiality, with specific reference to the use of the office. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 22, paragraph 4.12)
p.5
Recommendations
The processes that the registered person puts in place to enable a review of the quality of care (Regulation 45), should allow for a report to be generated at least once every six months. The generated report should be sent to Ofsted and the placing authorities of all children in the home who are children looked after. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 65, paragraph 15.3)
p.5
Information about this children’s home
This independently owned home is registered to care for up to three children with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.6
Good
In a short time, children make good progress from their starting points. Staff cajole and encourage children to be involved in, and take part in, the running of the home. As a result, they improve their capacity for taking personal responsibility for their personal space, their appearance, and their ability to contemplate the prospect of living with increased independence.
p.7
Good
The staff patiently persevere, and some appropriately challenge the children who say: ‘You are not my parent. I will not be doing what you say.’ The result is often that the child does eventually do as asked. Examples include education and work experience.
p.7
Good
Both children living in the home have significant previous histories, reflecting difficulty attending and engaging with education. Partner agencies, fully aware of the presenting issues, work with the home towards turning this around. Holding in mind the importance of education, the staff work creatively to identify each child’s individual interests. They then involve and motivate the children in order to complement the educational/work experience opportunities provided by other agencies. Recognising that children have individual learning styles, the results are that there are degrees of success, representing some progress for that individual. For example, one child has completed a home-based project on animals, while the other takes part in a photography-based work placement. One child said: ‘I have not been to school for a long time and I will not go. But here I know that the staff are trying to do things to help me think about education and what I want to do in
p.7
Good
Some staff and some children have good relationships. One child said: ‘Yes, the staff here are all OK so far.’ Nevertheless, children overtly and indiscriminately challenge the adults working in the home. They sometimes smoke in their bedrooms, swear and make threats. Some tenacious staff persevere to make clear that these behaviours are not acceptable. However, other staff are less clear, resulting in mixed messages. Additionally, records show that staff only occasionally log the range of positive and negative consequences implemented. This means that the effectiveness of strategies used is not clear to all team members, and therefore does not consistently help children to learn from the impact of their behaviours.
p.7
Good
Children are registered with health professionals, such as GPs, dentists and opticians. Where children show reluctance to attend, or seek to conceal attendance, the staff manage these situations well, including challenging local services if required. This means that the staff are willing to advocate to ensure that partnership agencies fulfil their responsibilities to promote welfare.
p.7
Good
Families and those who are significant to the child are welcome to visit and are in regular contact. One parent said: ‘The staff keep me up to date with what is happening.’ This helps children to maintain their identity while ensuring that there continue to be adults involved in their lives who know them well and can contextualise some behaviours.
p.8
Good
Staff encourage the children to take part in a range of events out of the home. While success with energetic activities is limited, the children benefit from, and enjoy, trips to local attractions, such as the zoo and ice-skating. This helps to keep children engaged and reduces social isolation.
p.8
Good
Detailed risk assessments compiled by the responsible individual help staff to understand and be more aware of the dangers posed both outside and within the home. For example, aware of the potential for misusing drugs, staff liaise with key agencies about managing and reducing these risks. In addition, routine checks around the home and efficient fire prevention systems help to reduce the likelihood of an emergency requiring external assistance.
p.8
Good
One child stated clearly that he feels safe living in the home. He was clear about who he would contact should he have any concerns about his care or about staff behaviour.
p.8
Good
Children feel listened to. Complaints raised by children or their families are looked into quickly. This means that the responsible individual is aware and responsive to working in partnership with those involved to ensure that service delivery is effectively transparent.
p.8
Good
One agency says: ‘Staff are constantly trying.’ As a result, incidents of missing are infrequent, representing a dramatic improvement in personal safety and reduction in risk of exploitation for both children.
p.8
Good
Staff do not use physical intervention to manage risky behaviours in the home. The provider chooses not to offer training for staff in this area, and instead offers training in de-escalation strategies, with some success.
p.8
Good
Offending in the community has reduced, representing a notable improvement for those children. Incidents do occur in the home. Staff and the responsible individual document these well, showing the action taken to reduce the likelihood of reoccurrence. In one incident sampled, an emergency call made to the police resulted in one child’s arrest. While the provider had appropriately consulted and liaised with all other key stakeholders, she had not notified Ofsted, thus representing a shortfall, but with no direct impact for children on this occasion.
p.9
Requires improvement
The home opened in September 2015. The registered manager resigned shortly after the children arrived in 2016. The responsible individual, aware of the impact of this and the need to appoint a manager for the home urgently, intends not to admit any new children until there is a named individual identified and ready to begin the process of registration. She spends significant amounts of time in the home helping the staff to deal directly with the children. This means that she makes substantial effort towards achieving positive outcomes by role modelling the approach outlined in the statement of purpose.
p.9
Requires improvement
The responsible individual is ensuring that systems set up in the home are clear for staff and are accessible. Structured placement plans and detailed daily records provide information about progress and the work completed with children. However, boundaries around children’s access to the office are not sufficiently consistent, and therefore have the potential to compromise confidentiality.
p.9
Requires improvement
External monitoring arrangements provide an impartial overview of the arrangements for promoting the quality standards. However, the processes for internal monitoring and review are under construction and the children’s register is not ready. Because this is a new service, these shortfalls have no direct impact for the children in placement.
p.9
Requires improvement
Good quality relationships with partner agencies, such as the police, the youth offending team, virtual schools and placing local authority social workers, help to ensure that systematic support is available for the children. Those agencies say: ‘Communication is good.’ The responsible individual is proactive and quick to involve organisations when she feels that there is potential benefit for the children. This means that agencies working with the provider can expect regular feedback about what is going well and what needs to improve, in order to progress the overall experiences for each individual placed. The home’s situation on the outskirts of a city centre means that it is within easy access of health, leisure and recreational facilities. The location risk assessment provides relevant general information and references information from the local crime rates. However, it does not address the particular position of the building.
p.9
Requires improvement
This means that staff may be unaware of the potential risks linked to the play park adjacent and the main road visible from the rear of the building.
p.10
Requires improvement
Recruitment processes are thorough, ensuring that only those who evidence suitability work directly with the children. Staff experience a structured induction, receive regular supervision and access training, such as on safeguarding and fire safety. This helps them to understand and consider their work with the children. One member of staff said: ‘The ethos of the home is that every intervention matters and that’s what we are trying to do. Training is good and supervision is a good place to reflect on our role.’
p.10
What the inspection judgements mean
The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.
p.11
What the inspection judgements mean
An outstanding children’s home provides highly effective services that contribute to significantly improved outcomes for children and young people who need help and protection and care. Their progress exceeds expectations and is sustained over time. A good children’s home provides effective services that help, protect and care for children and young people and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. In a children’s home that requires improvement , there are no widespread or serious failures that create or leave children being harmed or at risk of harm. The welfare of looked after children is safeguarded and promoted. Minimum requirements are in place, however, the children’s home is not yet delivering good protection, help and care for children and young people. A children’s home that is inadequate is providing services where there are widespread or serious failures that create or leave children and young people being
p.11
What the inspection judgements mean
harmed or at risk of harm or result in children looked after not having their welfare safeguarded and promoted.
p.11
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s
p.12
Information about this inspection
Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.13
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.13
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.13
Information about this inspection
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion