Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 May 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Wright

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Wright

  • Postcode verified

    N10 2NL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiouspositiveeffectiveimprovedstrongknowledgeableconfidentaccurate
Criticismweaknessespersistent absenceinconsistenciesdeclininggaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings737w+22
  • Leadership132w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
868
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%Leadership 15%

Full report text

Mr Hugh Vivian Headteacher Hollickwood Primary School Sydney Rd Muswell Hill London N10 2NL

p.1

School

Following my visit to the school on 29 April 2016 I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the

areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and the chair of the governing body. I also held a discussion with a senior officer from the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s improvement plans, information about pupils’ achievement and documentation relating to safeguarding. I visited classes with you to look at pupils’ work and observe them during lessons.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection the deputy headteacher has left the school. This has allowed you to reorganise the senior leadership team. The Year 5 class is being taught by a teacher on a temporary contract. Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Main findings

Your plans for improvement are sharply focused on the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. They include suitably ambitious measures of success, which are checked in a timely manner. Senior leaders have maintained the positive culture for learning which is a well-established feature of the school. At the same time, they have stepped up the challenge and expectations of teachers’ work. The assistant head teacher has played a significant role in developing the skills of the wider leadership team. These leaders have become more knowledgeable and confident in their leadership skills. You are holding teachers more closely to account when monitoring the quality of their work. However, the guidance you provide to help teachers improve further needs to be more sharply focused on the weaknesses identified at the last inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Your checks on the progress pupils are making have become more reliable and accurate. You have wisely ensured that these assessments are checked both within school and in collaboration with teachers from other schools. This work is helping accelerate pupils’ progress. However, more emphasis could be placed on the evidence provided by work in pupils’ books when deciding how well they are doing.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils in key stage 1 are making better progress in reading and mathematics. This is because teachers are picking up weaknesses in their learning earlier. You have engaged parents more effectively in continuing pupils’ learning at home. Homework provided now covers a wider range of subjects. Training for teachers and support staff has been effective in improving their skills in teaching these subjects.

p.2

Main findings

The teaching of writing has also improved. Pupils make better progress because teachers provide more effective guidance and use clearer language to explain how pupils can improve their work. Teachers have higher expectations of the quality of vocabulary which pupils are expected to include in their writing. The range of literature teachers use to exemplify good writing has improved. Leaders pick up on any inconsistencies in the quality of teaching more rapidly and precisely.

p.2

Main findings

The external review of the use of pupil premium funding has been used well to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Most are making better progress than other pupils in the school. This is enabling gaps to close. Leaders have used the review to ensure that a specific focus on disadvantaged pupils is maintained.

p.2

Main findings

Your attempts to improve pupils’ attendance and reduce persistent absence have led to some success. Persistent absence is declining and overall attendance has risen. However, you know more work needs to be done to achieve the ambitious targets you have set in your plans. Many pupils do attend the sessions you provide for them to complete additional work before and after the school day. This demonstrates the positive impact you are having on improving the attitudes of some pupils and parents to learning and attendance. Governors have continued to offer strong challenge and support when questioning you about the impact of your plans for improvement. They have ensured that objectives to evaluate teachers’ performance are aligned with the areas for improvement from the last inspection. Their strategic acumen is of crucial value in ensuring that leaders sustain the pace of improvement towards becoming a good

p.2

External support

The local authority has increased its involvement with the school since the last full inspection, and now visits very regularly. This has ensured that the authority has a detailed, accurate knowledge of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. This helps the authority to provide valuable support to school leaders, particularly in the pursuit of external verification of the success of your improvement plans.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of children’s services for Barnet and the regional schools commissioner. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion