Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder 131902

Inspected 28 Apr 2016 · URN 131902

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Patricia Edward

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Apr 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Patricia Edward

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    131902

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 43% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresshappyeffectiveconfidentsafeeffectivelystrengthsenjoy
Criticismweaknessesbreachat riskweaknessnot sufficientlycompromiseharmmisses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings182w+53
  • What needs to improve516w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
659
about usual (typical 743)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 16%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 28 April 2016 2 February 2010

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Good 2

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The childminder has not informed Ofsted about all changes to household members so that their suitability can checked. This is also a breach of the Childcare Register requirements. However, there is no significant impact, as the childminder does not leave children unsupervised.  The childminder has not explored all possible ways to encourage children's recognition of letters and familiar words, as part of their literacy development.  The childminder does not use all opportunities to extend partnerships with other early years settings that children attend.  The childminder has not fully developed her self-evaluation process to help identify and target all areas for improvement.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children make good progress. The childminder uses information about their achievements and interests effectively to prepare them for the next stage in their learning.  The childminder forms close bonds with the children. Children are happy and feel content in her care. They are developing skills for their next stage of learning.  Children use a good variety of quality toys and learning resources to support their play and learning.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that Ofsted is notified of changes to household members within the specified timeframe so that their suitability can be checked 13/05/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 increase opportunities for children to extend their literacy skills further  strengthen partnerships with other settings that children attend, to share information about their progress and provide continuity in their learning  improve the self-evaluation process to identify weaknesses in meeting requirements and to target areas for improvement, to raise outcomes for children further.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector spoke to the childminder and the children at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector observed the childminder's interactions with the children.  The inspector sampled a range of documentation, including policies and procedures, and children's records.  The inspector conducted a tour of the premises that the childminder uses for childminding purposes.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has a secure understanding of child protection practices and keeps her knowledge up to date, such as through training. She is alert to any signs that children may be at risk of harm and is aware of the child protection procedures to follow. She uses risk assessments appropriately to help ensure children play in a safe environment. However, the childminder has not kept Ofsted informed about changes to household members, as required. Nonetheless, she supervises children closely at all times to keep them safe. The childminder's current system for evaluation is not sufficiently robust to support her to monitor her strengths and weaknesses in order to identify areas to improve. The childminder has a number of children who attend other early years settings. However, she does not establish meaningful partnerships with these settings to help provide consistency in children's learning.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

The childminder completes detailed initial assessments with parents when children start, to identify their likes, dislikes and abilities. She is proactive in getting involved in children's play to extend their learning and confidence. For example, she asks children useful questions, encouraging them to express themselves and extend their vocabulary. However, she misses opportunities to develop further children's early reading skills. The childminder has developed effective partnerships with parents. For example, she regularly shares details of children's developmental progress with them to encourage them to reinforce the learning at home.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Children are happy and enjoy their time with the childminder. Children's behaviour is age- appropriate. The childminder offers children sufficient praise and encouragement, which helps them to feel confident and proud. They demonstrate that they have a sense of belonging. For example, when children return from school they follow hygiene routines without promoting. The childminder helps children to learn how to keep safe in an emergency, for example, through practising fire evacuation procedures. However, the weakness in leadership and management has the potential to compromise children's welfare.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Children are happy in the childminder's care. They gain useful skills in preparation for school, for example, they are confident and sociable. Children learn from the activities provided and make good progress from their starting points. They develop good mathematical skills. For example, they are able to count confidently and use mathematical language in their play.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 131902 Local authority Kingston upon Thames Inspection number 840889 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 3 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 13

p.4

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 2 February 2010

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder was registered in 1992. She lives in Chessington, Surrey. The childminder operates her service Monday to Friday, all year round.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion