Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care interim inspection

–

Inspected 30 Mar 2016 · URN SC394463

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alicea Churchward

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    30 Mar 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Alicea Churchward

  • Postcode verified

    WA2 0XP

  • URN verified

    SC394463

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentimprovedextremelyeffectiveindependenteffectively
Criticismnot excellentdeclinednot happynot independent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings516w+50
  • What needs to improve96w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
612
shorter than usual (typical 904)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 43%

Full report text

The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of

children and young people since the most recent full inspection. This home was judged outstanding at the full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness . Generally, young people who have been in this home for considerable amounts of time make outstanding progress in all aspects of their care and support. Engagement with the manager and staff largely depends on their ability to form attachments, so that they can begin to address issues and then make progress. This is not the case for all young people. Some find the process very difficult and as a result do not benefit from the excellent service that this home has to offer them. A great deal of thought and effort goes into trying to engage young people in all aspects of their plans, for example trying to reduce periods of young people being missing from the home. This can be problematic with young people placed a long

p.2

The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of

way from home who miss their friends and family. Even when visits are organised, young people can find this plan difficult to work towards and can go missing as a result and are usually located in their respective local authority. Staff are working hard with education providers on an incentivised plan and similarly so with the young person on an incentivised activity plan to encourage engagement within the home and the wider community. Discussions are held to determine how effective the service is for individual young people, for example where little progress is being made and their behaviour negatively impacts upon other young people. One young person was not happy about a decision that had been made. Despite all of the information in the home about how to make a complaint, which is also covered in young people’s admission to the home, the young person said that he was not aware of how to do so. The manager has agreed to access an

p.2

The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of

independent advocate to represent the young person. Independent visits to the home have improved with the manager finding the reports about areas of development helpful in moving the service forward. There was one shortfall identified at this inspection in regard to an incident that was not highlighted by the independent visitor. This was brought to the attention of the manager who agreed to take immediate remedial action. The manager also monitors the home regularly and this is mainly very good. However, the shortfall was not highlighted in this monitoring either and as a result, room for improvement is identified. Staff and the manager work very effectively in partnership with others and this mainly works extremely well for the young people who manage to engage with the excellent services on offer. Examples of these are with the local police, safeguarding, education providers, social workers and parents, wherever possible.

p.2

The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of

One recommendation to review the statement of purpose document at the time of the last inspection has been partially addressed. The responsible person and the registered manager have begun consultations on the best way to replace some of the professional language to make the document more accessible.

p.3

Information about this children's home

The home is privately owned and provides care and accommodation for three young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.4

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.4

Recent inspection history

05/02/2015 CH – Interim Sustained effectiveness

p.4

Recent inspection history

03/02/2015 CH – Interim Sustained effectiveness

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendation:  Ensure that the Statement of Purpose is kept under review, in particular making it accessible to those outside of the social work profession, for example, some parents (‘Guide to the Children’s Homes Regulations’, page 13, paragraph 3.5).

p.5

What the inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection’.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the Children's Homes Regulations, including the quality standards’. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.7

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion