Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 21 Apr 2016 · published 16 May 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Riozzi

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Apr 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Riozzi

  • Postcode verified

    TS9 7JL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedskilfullyindependentsecureclearlyimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
778
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Kathryn McDonald Headteacher Bilsdale Midcable Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Chop Gate Middlesbrough TS9 7JL

p.1

Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 21 April 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Chop Gate Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

 ensure that pupils have routine opportunities to attempt challenging mathematical problems.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, two members of the governing body, the lead teacher, a representative of the local authority, a representative of the diocese and the national leader of education supporting the school, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I examined the school improvement plan and notes of visits made by the local authority and other partners. In addition, I reviewed documents relating to school governance and the headteacher’s monitoring records.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection, a teacher has left the school, and the previous key stage 1 teacher, assisted by a higher level teaching assistant, is now teaching the two small classes together.

p.2

Main findings

You have not shied away from difficult decisions since the last inspection, and along with the lead teacher have been relentless in your drive for improvement. You have been adept at channelling external support so that it is sharply tailored to the needs of the school. You have also secured additional support, independent of external partners, through effective networking.

p.2

Main findings

Development planning is much improved. You have identified appropriate actions within a realistic timescale. The school improvement plan still needs sharpening further so that the intended impact of actions is made more explicit. This change would better support governors in shifting their emphasis from checking the implementation of actions to evaluating the difference the actions make to the learning and progress of pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Governors, with the help of the local authority and diocese, have appointed you as the permanent headteacher to secure the longer term leadership of the school. The decision to separate the work of the two governing bodies in the confederation is enabling governors to shine a brighter light on the performance of each school. The information you are providing for governors is helping them to get a better handle on pupils’ progress and attainment, so they are beginning to ask the right questions.

p.2

Main findings

You are regularly checking on pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. Effective coaching of middle leaders within the confederation is building the confidence and skills of leaders to undertake their roles. Consequently, there is scope to increase leadership capacity by having subject leaders check on the quality of teaching across both schools. Raised expectations of key stage 2 pupils can clearly be seen in the pupils’ work books. The teacher is skilfully matching work to the different abilities of each pupil, including the most able. This has brought about an improvement in the rate of pupils’ progress, which in some cases has been rapid. The quality of the adults’ questioning is deepening pupils’ thinking. Pupils are engaged and enjoying school, and behaviour is improving because of the increase in challenge and the relevant and stimulating curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are writing at length on a more regular basis and in other subjects in addition to English. This is enabling them to develop stamina and sustain quality throughout a piece of writing. Pupils need more routine opportunities to practise problem solving in mathematics lessons and other subjects.

p.3

External support

The local authority and diocese have brokered effective support for leaders, governors and teachers that is helping the school to move forward. Specialist leaders from within the Swaledale Alliance have been effective, showing leaders within school how to check that teaching is having the intended impact on learning. These leaders check that advice is acted upon and is making a difference.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion