Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Puddleducks Nurseries

Inspected 28 Apr 2016 · published 13 May 2016 · URN EY406257

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Tracey Dawson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Apr 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Tracey Dawson

  • Early years verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    N11 3EH

  • Name on report verified

    Puddleducks Nurseries

  • URN verified

    EY406257

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 57% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelytimelyenjoymentcaringenjoyaccuratelyconsistent
Criticismweaknesseslacknot alwaysfailsdelaynot effectiveconcernsinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings525w−52
  • Leadership111w−38
  • What needs to improve249w+38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
868
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
7
typical 7
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Puddleducks Nurseries Rear of 75, Friern Barnet Road, London, N11 3EH

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 28 April 2016 26 June 2013

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Staff do not understand their roles as key persons, particularly in supporting babies to settle effectively and in working with parents. This fails to meet children's needs.  The management team does not monitor staff performance rigorously or provide effective supervision to address weaknesses in practice and improve standards.  Children do not make adequate progress. Staff do not monitor and assess children's achievements, or plan what they need to learn next in agreement with parents.  Staff do not complete the progress check for children aged two years in a timely manner and share this with parents. This fails to identify children's specific needs.  Staff do not promote each child's communication and language skills adequately, including children whose home language is not English and those with language delay, which slows their individual level of progress.  Self-evaluation processes are not effective to identify and address all weaknesses in

p.1

This provision is inadequate

practice, including the action and recommendations raised at the last inspection.  Staff do not plan the morning routine well to meet the needs of all children, particularly babies, to enhance their experience and enjoyment.  Staff do not always encourage children to manage small tasks for themselves to build their independence skills.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children generally behave well and have opportunities to develop their social skills.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 implement an effective key-person system so that each child's care is tailored to meet their individual needs, in partnership with their parents 03/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure staff's professional development needs are met effectively, and monitor their ongoing performance through regular supervision, support and training, to improve the quality of teaching and provide children with good quality learning experiences 03/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 review children's progress between the ages of two and three years, and provide parents with a written summary of their child's development 03/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 make effective use of assessments to monitor children's progress and plan challenging and exciting activities for them, involving parents fully in the process to support learning at home 03/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure all children receive sufficient support in developing their language and communication skills, including children who are learning English as an additional language and those who have language delay. 03/06/2016 To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 implement an effective system of self-evaluation to accurately identify and address all weaknesses in practice, and use this system effectively to make consistent improvements in children's outcomes  review the organisation of some daily routines to meet the needs of all children, with particular regard to supporting the emotional well-being of babies during the morning session  use all opportunities throughout the day for children to do things for themselves so that they learn to become more independent.

p.3

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning and development.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector spoke with the members of staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection, and held a meeting with the owner and manager.  The inspector sampled various documents, including children's records, evidence of staff suitability to work with children, and a range of the nursery's policies and procedures.  The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Recent changes to the management have had a negative impact on the quality of the provision. There has been a lack of appropriate support, including effective monitoring and supervision of staff, and opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills. Staff hold relevant qualifications. However, they lack a basic knowledge and understanding of how children learn. The acting manager has begun to carry out a review of the provision, although it is too soon to see any improvements. The owner ensures that staff are suitable to work with children, and all staff know what to do in the event of any concerns about a child's welfare. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

Staff do not have a secure knowledge of how to promote children's language and communication development. They do not extend children's vocabulary sufficiently to build their language skills. Staff do not use their assessments to provide challenging enough experiences to extend children's learning effectively. For example, during the inspection, children passively watched a member of staff make play dough and were over-directed when they tried to join in. Due to inconsistencies in assessments, including the progress checks for two-year-old children, staff lack a clear understanding of children's stages of development to plan for their next steps in learning. Partnerships with parents are not always effective. Staff do not routinely share assessments and children's ongoing progress with parents to complement home learning.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Staff lack a clear understanding of their roles as key persons, including how to work effectively with parents to support children's individual learning and care needs. Staff have caring attitudes. However, they do not always respond swiftly to babies' individual needs or make timely interactions. For example, some staff focus on carrying out daily tasks rather than addressing children's needs, such as during morning routines. Children enjoy playing outside, which promotes their health and physical well-being. For example, children learn to ride bikes and they climb on a small climbing frame. Children have limited opportunities to manage some daily tasks by themselves, which restricts their growing independence skills. Children interact and play well alongside others and learn to share resources.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children do not make the progress they should or gain the skills they need for the next stage of their learning. They do not develop their communication and language skills adequately, particularly those children who are learning English as an additional language and those with language delay.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY406257 Local authority Barnet Inspection number 1028534 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 5 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 19 Name of provider Rosedale Nursery Ltd Date of previous inspection 26 June 2013 Telephone number 0208 361 9602

p.5

Setting details

Puddleducks Nurseries registered in 2010. The nursery operates in New Southgate, in the London Borough of Barnet. The nursery is open Monday to Friday, from 7.30am to 6pm, all year round. The provider is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education to children aged three and four years. Six staff work with the children and all hold appropriate early years qualifications.

p.5

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.5

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Setting details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion