Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 15 Apr 2016 · published 4 May 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nick Whittaker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Apr 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nick Whittaker

  • Postcode verified

    DN8 5BY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstrongeffectiveimprovedengagingskilfullystronglypositive
Criticismweaknessesmissedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings495w+47
  • What needs to improve232w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
727
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr David Page Principal Trinity Academy Church Balk Thorne Doncaster South Yorkshire DN8 5BY

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Trinity Academy

Following my visit to your school on 15 April 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Trinity Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Trinity Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Trinity Academy

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Trinity Academy

 ensure that middle leaders monitor teachers’ work closely so that areas for improvement are identified clearly and tackled quickly.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, the chair of the governing body and a representative from the Emmanuel Schools Foundation, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I scrutinised school documents and evaluated the school’s action plan. I met with a group of pupils, visited classes with a senior leader and examined the work in pupils’ books and folders.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection one senior leader has joined the school.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have a clear view of the school’s effectiveness and know what needs to be done to move the school to good. There is a shared and determined drive for improvement and a strong commitment to tackle the weaknesses identified at the last section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Systems to support improvement are strengthening. Senior and middle leaders are routinely checking teachers’ work, for example by observing pupils’ learning in lessons, looking at the work in their books and folders and monitoring their progress. Occasionally, middle leaders do not focus sharply enough on the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning and progress. As a result, areas for improvement in teachers’ practice are sometimes missed.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils say that teaching has improved since the last section 5 inspection. Year 7 pupils talked enthusiastically about the interesting work they are set in English, mathematics and science. In mathematics, Year 11 pupils said that more regular assessments are helping them to understand how well they are doing and what they need to do to achieve their target grades.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils make fastest progress when learning activities are challenging, engaging and closely matched to their interests and levels of ability. In a Year 7 history lesson, for example, pupils’ interest was sparked by an intriguing source of information which they used to explore their ideas about a historical event. Pupils developed and deepened their understanding because the teacher questioned them skilfully and challenged them to explain their ideas.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s action plan provides a secure starting point for tackling the areas for improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. Actions are sharply focused on improving pupils’ learning and progress and, rightly, strongly emphasise accelerating the progress of disadvantaged pupils, boys and the most-able pupils. Senior leaders are keeping a close eye on the learning and progress of these groups of pupils. Assessment information indicates that pupils are making faster progress, and gaps between disadvantaged pupils and other pupils are starting to narrow.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are adding urgency to the school’s drive for improvement and are restless for change. Governors demand detailed information about all aspects of the school’s work. Reports are analysed with forensic precision and governors do not hold back when questioning and challenging senior leaders.

p.2

External support

The school is drawing on outstanding practice in other academies from the Emmanuel Schools Foundation and across the region. The executive principal is sharply focused on the progress and impact of the school’s action plan and, as a result, external support is quickly and purposefully mobilised, and intensified, when needed. This is starting to have a positive impact on the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning and progress.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Doncaster. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion