Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Apr 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 2
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    +33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praisetimely

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
    • Findings142w+33
    • What needs to improve105w0

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No strong criticism found.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    2
    Words of findings
    246
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 45, typical 45
    Average sentence
    16 words
    Next steps
    5
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    0%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 57%What needs to improve 43%

    Full report text

    Summary of outcome

    On 29 March 2016, we received a notification from the provider about an allegation. This means that the provider met their legal responsibilities in informing Ofsted of allegations. We needed to check to make sure that the Early Years Foundation Stage safeguarding and welfare requirements were being met. In particular, the requirements relating to safeguarding practice.

    p.1

    Summary of outcome

    We carried out an unannounced visit. We found that the setting had received two allegations. We found that contact had not been made in a timely manner on both occasions with the relevant outside agencies.

    p.1

    Summary of outcome

    As a result, we issued the provider with a notice to improve that asks them to:

    p.1

    Summary of outcome

    - ensure timely contact is made with outside agencies in the event of an allegation being made against any member of staff.

    p.1

    Summary of outcome

    The provider responded appropriately to the action raised and remains registered with Ofsted.

    p.1

    Publication of compliance action

    We aim to ensure that the welfare of children and young people is protected in the services we regulate. The Childcare Act 2006 and accompanying regulations set out our responsibilities to regulate childminders and childcare providers. This includes the enforcement powers we have in relation to those registered providers who do not comply with the requirements for registration.

    p.1

    Publication of compliance action

    We publish details of any actions we take, or the childminder or childcare provider takes to bring about compliance with requirements on our website for a period of five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.

    p.1

    Publication of compliance action

    For further information please read Ofsted’s Enforcement Policy .

    p.2

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion