Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Bigland Green Primary School
Summary
Andrew Wright (lead), David Radomsky, Denvir Visvanathan, James Waite, Susan Cox
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Oct 2015
- Inspectors verified
Andrew Wright, David Radomsky, Denvir Visvanathan, James Waite, Susan Cox
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
E1 2ND
- Name on report verified
Bigland Green Primary School
- URN verified
100939
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Skilful teaching and consistent modelling of accurate, clear speech by adults enables children to make rapid progress. p.5
- Pupils who arrive mid-year with no knowledge or experience of English make excellent progress. p.1
- During lessons, pupils demonstrate exemplary attitudes to learning. p.4
- Children are making much more rapid progress as a result, including those with disabilities and special educational needs. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have not made sure that standards are rising quickly enough. p.1
- There is too much inconsistency in the extent to which teachers follow some of the agreed policies. p.1
- As a result, some pupils do not receive sufficient guidance to help them make good progress. p.1
- Not all teachers set most-able pupils work at a sufficiently challenging level. p.1
- Consequently, not enough of these pupils achieve the higher levels of attainment. p.1
- Standards at the end of Key Stage 2 remain too low. p.1
- Disadvantaged pupils entitled to additional funding are catching up with their peers in the school, but do not attain as well as other pupils nationally. p.1
- Actions taken to help pupils learn phonics (the sounds that letters make) more quickly have not led to a sustained increase in the number of pupils reaching the expected standard by the end of Year 1. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,600
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bigland Green Primary School Bigland Street, London E1 2ND
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement Early years provision Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
Leaders have not made sure that standards are rising quickly enough. Levels of attainment remain too low. There is too much inconsistency in the extent to which teachers follow some of the agreed policies. As a result, some pupils do not receive sufficient guidance to help them make good progress. Not all teachers set most-able pupils work at a sufficiently challenging level. Consequently, not enough of these pupils achieve the higher levels of attainment. Standards at the end of Key Stage 2 remain too low. Disadvantaged pupils entitled to additional funding are catching up with their peers in the school, but do not attain as well as other pupils nationally. Actions taken to help pupils learn phonics (the sounds that letters make) more quickly have not led to a sustained increase in the number of pupils reaching the expected standard by the end of Year 1.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural education enables them to make positive contributions to their own community, promotes ambition and helps pupils appreciate how others choose to live. Pupils make good progress in the early years. They develop positive attitudes to learning. Weak skills in their speech and language on entry are quickly improved. School leaders ensure safeguarding procedures are understood by all staff, rigorously implemented and kept under regular review. Pupils feel safe and are taught well about how to keep themselves safe. Pupils who arrive mid-year with no knowledge or experience of English make excellent progress. Pupils concentrate in lessons and enjoy learning. They behave in a harmonious and safe manner. Governance has been strengthened since the last inspection. Governors are in a stronger position to hold leaders to account for the impact of their actions. Parents have confidence in school leaders and
p.1
The school has the following strengths
benefit from a wide range of opportunities to learn how they can support their child’s learning.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that leaders at all levels hold teachers to account for consistently and effectively following agreed teaching policies. Improve the quality of teaching so that pupils’ progress quickens, and standards rise more rapidly by: ̶ ensuring that all teachers make effective use of policies and assessment information to help all groups of pupils improve their work and make good progress in all subjects ̶ checking that all teachers plan lessons and activities which move on pupils’ learning, especially the most able, as soon as they are ready.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
The headteacher has eradicated the weakest teaching which he identified shortly after the last inspection. His decisions to reorganise and appoint new members of staff to his senior leadership team were well considered. However, senior leaders have not improved the quality of teaching enough. This is because leaders do not insist that every teacher follows the agreed teaching and assessment policies consistently. Leaders have not ensured that the work some teachers set for pupils is challenging enough, especially for the most able. As a result, too many pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. Senior leaders use a range of evidence to check systematically on the work of teachers. They use these regular checks to decide on appropriate priorities for training and support. They make sure that the objectives set to manage teachers’ performance are linked to outcomes for pupils and the agreed
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
priorities for school improvement. Senior leaders have not made effective use of these rigorous systems to hold all teachers to account for the impact of their work on pupils’ achievement. They have tolerated inconsistency in the quality of teaching during a period of significant staff change since the last inspection. Middle leaders support the process of planning for improvement well. They monitor standards systematically and regularly. A system of ‘shadow leadership’ is helpful in building leadership capacity. However, middle leaders are less successful in helping make sure that all teachers apply the agreed policies fully and to good effect. The headteacher and his senior team have secured the trust and confidence of many parents by promoting values of openness and honesty strongly, and improving communications. They have been particularly successful in inspiring more parents to attend events intended to improve their understanding
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
of how their children learn, and of safeguarding issues. Leaders promote equality of opportunity well and have been successful in improving participation in the whole range of activities on offer. For example, nearly all pupils and parents new to the school who arrive with little or no skills in English attend extra classes before the school day begins. Leaders at all levels work effectively to ensure that safeguarding procedures and policies are well understood and consistently applied. These arrangements are kept under regular review and meet statutory requirements. The curriculum offers a broad and balanced range of subjects, with a clear progression of subject-specific skills linked to the programmes of study. Middle leaders are managing the transition to assessment without levels thoughtfully, using the opportunity to raise expectations of what might be achieved by each year group. Specialist teaching of art, music and physical education contributes well to the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
achievement of pupils in these subjects. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is well provided for. Their ambitions are heightened and their horizons are broadened by inspiring events and activities. For example, older pupils visit a leading university to attend lectures and learn about higher education. This year they learned about the origins of democracy in Ancient Greek culture. A broad range of opportunities to understand the importance of tolerance and respect for others prepares them well for their future lives in modern Britain. Leaders’ use of the additional funding available to disadvantaged pupils is increasingly effective. The additional support provided by this funding is monitored well and has led to recent improvements to outcomes for these pupils. As a result, gaps in attainment are closing. Leaders have used the sport premium funding to ensure a greater proportion of pupils take part in a
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
wider range of sports than previously. Approximately six in every 10 pupils attend sports clubs after school as a result. The local authority offers valuable advice and training to school leaders and governors. This has been particularly effective in helping senior leaders to challenge the weakest teaching and improve governance. Links with other local successful schools enable teachers to understand how barriers to learning can be overcome. The governance of the school Since the last inspection, governance has improved. New governors have brought access to a wider range of skills and their work to check on standards has been sharpened. Governors ask insightful and challenging questions of school leaders and use a wider range of activities to consider the impact of leaders’ work. Governors ensure that decisions about teachers’ pay are informed by clear evidence of teachers’ impact on outcomes for pupils. ̶
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Governors fulfil their responsibilities to ensure safeguarding arrangements are effective. They ensure that decisions on how to spend additional funding for disadvantaged pupils are leading to improvements in rates of progress for these pupils. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching requires improvement because there is too much inconsistency in the way teachers apply agreed policies. As a result, not all pupils make as much progress as they could. This is why standards are not rising quickly enough in some parts of the school. Teachers assess pupils’ progress frequently and work together to check the accuracy of their judgements. However, not all teachers use the agreed policy on assessment and marking well enough to help pupils build on their learning in subsequent lessons. Some teachers give most-able pupils work which is too easy for them. These pupils do not benefit from more challenging work which teachers could give them to help them improve. As a result, too few of these pupils attain as highly as they might. Teachers promote and uphold the school’s values well. They inspire most pupils to work hard and are skilled at managing and helping improve the more challenging behaviour exhibited by a small number of
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
pupils. Support staff provide effective additional guidance and encouragement to individuals or groups of pupils. In some classes, pupils benefit from regular, helpful advice about how to develop their mathematical skills. However, some teachers recognise success but do not offer guidance to help pupils master concepts often or clearly enough. Teachers give pupils plenty of opportunity to write in a wide range of genres and for some meaningful purposes. However, the guidance they give to help pupils improve their writing skills is too variable. The school has agreed a policy on handwriting, but not all teachers follow this or model it in their own writing. The teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) has been strengthened. However, it is not yet effective enough to ensure that reading standards in Key Stage 1 are rising rapidly and being sustained. Most teachers make sure that activities in reading lessons are sharply focused on developing pupils’
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
reading skills, including when they are not working directly with the teacher. This is improving pupils’ rates of progress. However, there are still some occasions when pupils are given less helpful activities to do in reading lessons.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils and parents express confidence in the ability of school staff to keep everyone safe and promote their well-being. They feel comfortable about approaching staff if they have concerns or need advice. Formal complaints from parents are rare. They are considered in accordance with the school’s policy when they do occur. Pupils spoken to understand exactly what bullying is and how it might occur. They say it is not a problem in school. Pupils have been well taught about how to stay safe from potential risks when they use the internet. Pupils are taught well about their social responsibilities. For example, they are diligent in efforts to conserve energy resources and enthusiastically raise money for charity. Leaders have provided training for parents about dangers posed by radicalisation and extremism. This has ensured that parents have a growing awareness of these potential risks to young people.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
Pupils are given effective guidance about how to stay healthy. This guidance is well matched to the age, abilities and starting points of individual pupils.
p.4
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils treat one another with kindness, respect and courtesy in the classroom and at play. They allow others to learn without disruption. They enjoy taking responsibility when this is asked of them. During lessons, pupils demonstrate exemplary attitudes to learning. However, work seen in books does not always echo this commitment to learning. Teachers sometimes need to repeat written comments asking pupils to complete work or try harder. As a result of effective monitoring and support from leaders, the unacceptable behaviour of a small number of pupils has become less frequent. The small number of instances of discriminatory behaviour logged in school records is declining. There have been no exclusions. Pupils’ attendance is average over time, but has risen higher than this on occasion. Nearly all pupils in Years 5 and 6 arrive an hour early at school for additional lessons. Pupils come to school with the correct
p.4
Behaviour
equipment and take good care of the premises.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
Outcomes for pupils require improvement because their progress is not consistently good across different subjects, groups and classes. The proportion of pupils who attain the expected level in the Year 1 phonics check is below the national average and dropped further in 2015. Leaders have focused sharply on providing training and resources with the aim of improving the teaching of reading, but this is not improving standards rapidly enough. Attainment by the end of Key Stage 1 is broadly in line with national averages, which represents good progress for many pupils with low starting points. However, the proportion of most-able pupils exceeding expected levels of attainment is lower than the national average. It is not showing sufficient improvement over time. Pupils’ attainment by the end of Key Stage 2 remains below that expected, based on the school’s own information. Senior leaders have recently plotted the attainment of pupils in each year group using new,
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
more challenging indicators of attainment. The higher expectations indicated by this move represent a positive move. However, pupils’ attainment information shows that many pupils need to exceed expected progress in order to make up for previous underachievement. Pupils with disabilities and special educational needs do not all make similar progress to their peers, given their starting points. Some do not make the progress expected of them through Key Stage 2, especially in writing. Disadvantaged pupils entitled to additional funding make similar progress to other pupils in the school, although they do not attain as highly as other pupils nationally. This is because attainment by the end of Key Stage 2 is lower than the national average. In 2014, disadvantaged pupils were about nine months behind other pupils in the school in mathematics and about six months behind in writing, but attained better than their peers in reading. The gap between their attainment and other pupils nationally was less
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
than six months in reading and mathematics but just over six months in writing. The school’s own evidence indicates that additional support provided to disadvantaged pupils is increasing the pace of their progress across the school in recent months and gaps are closing further. The very large proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language make progress which is as good as other pupils. Pupils arriving at the school with no prior experience of the English language or British culture make excellent progress as a result of the very effective support they and their parents receive. Many of these pupils go on to reach levels of attainment typical of their age by the end of Year 6, despite their very low starting points.
p.5
Early years provision is good
The early years is more effective than other parts of the school because leaders have secured a greater consistency in teaching quality, and standards are rising more rapidly as a result. Nearly all children enter the early years with very weak skills in speech, language and personal development. They have other skills which are lower than typical for their age. Skilful teaching and consistent modelling of accurate, clear speech by adults enables children to make rapid progress. By the end of the Reception Year, more than half of all children attain a good level of development. Although this proportion is lower than the national average, it has risen sharply in 2015, according to the school’s own evidence. Teachers ensure that children develop confidence and curiosity. They use these attributes to investigate the engaging activities on offer and to participate fully, whatever barriers may exist to their learning. This
p.5
Early years provision is good
prepares them well for the next stage of their education in Year 1. The early years leader has provided further training so that teachers are more effective in helping children acquire early skills in reading, writing and mathematics. Children are making much more rapid progress as a result, including those with disabilities and special educational needs. The quality of teaching and resources is equally good both indoors and outdoors. Children become increasingly confident and engaged as they develop their speaking and listening skills in the Nursery classes. The early years leader and her staff have created a positive, safe learning environment. Children are taught the skills needed to cooperate and persevere from the outset, in keeping with the six-step ‘learning mission’ which school leaders and governors have established. As a result, they play and learn safely, behave well and enjoy working together.
p.6
School details
Unique reference number 100939 Local authority Tower Hamlets Inspection number 10001413
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.7
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 478 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Zoinul Abidin Headteacher Abdul-Hayee Murshad Telephone number 020 7702 7088 Website www.biglandgreen.towerhamlets.sch.uk Email address admin@biglandgreen.towerhamlets.sch.uk Dates of previous inspection 3–4 November 2011
p.7
Information about this school
Bigland Green is a larger than average-sized primary school. It has two classes in each year group. The early years provision consists of two full-time Nursery classes and two full-time Reception classes. The vast majority of pupils speak English as an additional language. They are nearly all of Bangladeshi Asian heritage. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is above average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics at the end of Year 6. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported through the pupil premium is well above average. The pupil premium is additional government funding which supports pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals, or children who are looked after by the local authority. Since the last inspection the senior leadership team has been restructured. Four assistant headteachers
p.7
Information about this school
support the headteacher, three of whom have been appointed since the last inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning during a tour of the school and in longer observations in 13 lessons. Many of these observations were conducted with the headteacher and other senior leaders. They also spent time with school leaders scrutinising pupils’ work and considering the school’s own information about outcomes for pupils. Meetings were held with pupils, the headteacher, staff with leadership responsibilities, members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors listened to pupils read in Years 2 and 3. Inspectors looked at a range of documentation including minutes of governing body meetings, records of checks on the quality of teaching by leaders and information in relation to safeguarding. Inspectors took account of 38 parental responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. The lead inspector spoke to parents at the end of the school day.
p.8
Inspection team
Andrew Wright, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector David Radomsky Ofsted Inspector James Waite Ofsted Inspector Denvir Visvanathan Susan Cox Ofsted Inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.9
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.9
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion