Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Keys ACE Limited in Lancaster

Inspected — · URN SC066115

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Kersh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Mark Kersh

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • URN verified

    SC066115

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyimproved
Criticismdeclinedlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings64w−33
  • What needs to improve118w+14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
181
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 83%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC066115 Inspector Mark Kersh Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person Alliance Care & Education Limited Registered person address Brow Top Farm Quernmore LANCASTER LA2 0QW Responsible individual Andrew Taylor Registered manager Martin Evans / Scot Thomas Wilson Date of last inspection 12/11/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 16/02/2015

p.1

Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection None.

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

A new manager has been in post since November 2014 and an interview took place as part of this inspection to assess the new manager’s fitness for registration. As a result of this interview, a recommendation of suitable has been made. The new manager is eager and enthusiastic. He has the relevant qualifications and experience for the role of a Registered Manager having previously held this position in other children’s homes.

p.2

This inspection

The manager has taken time to assess the functioning of the home and has devised a clear and robust short term development and action plan focussing on areas identified for immediate improvement such as considering staff skills and training needs. This demonstrates the manager's commitment to improve standards of care and outcomes for young people.

p.2

This inspection

The one requirement and two recommendations made at the last inspection have been met. There is now a delegated system within the management team to ensure all staff receive regular supervision. Formal consultations with young people and their families now take place weekly with any issues arising being considered and responded to. A new bathroom door lock has been ordered to replace a bolt lock, should staff need to gain access in an emergency situation.

p.2

This inspection

Staff encourage young people to attend education. Where there is resistance, staff persevere and strive to hold a line to maintain a regular daily routine. Where there are delays in enrolling young people into education beyond the control of the home, staff proactively advocate for young people. They liaise with other agencies to ensure this remains a priority. In such instances, young people are engaged in the on-site school. This ensures that young people do not fall behind and understand that their education and development is important. 3 of 5 Young people respond positively to staff who know their needs well and are attentive to them. They describe a nurturing and committed staff team, who they can rely on for regular, reliable guidelines. There are no current behaviour management issues and all young people say they get on well with each other. There are no incidents of bullying or intimidation. Young people say that they are,

p.2

This inspection

‘pleased’ with the care provided, and ‘it’s good here, I like the education’ and all young people say they feel safe and have no concerns about this home.

p.3

This inspection

Staff establish positive relationships with the young people and their families. They are knowledgeable about the young people and their agreed arrangements for contact. Young people enjoy contact with significant family members and friends in and outside of the home. Staff promote positive contact. As a result of these agreed contact arrangements, young people have significantly reduced their absences and are less likely to place themselves at risk.

p.3

This inspection

Extended contact arrangements have been made and agreed for some young people during this half-term week. Other young people are enjoying a range of planned activities and outings with the staff.

p.3

This inspection

The home is at full capacity. Since the last inspection one young person has had a planned departure and two young people have arrived, of which one was an emergency placement.

p.3

This inspection

The manager has implemented a range of improvements in relation to the monitoring of the home. This includes regular monthly reports which identify key actions, areas of progress and an evaluation of young people’s outcomes. There is a more robust compatibility risk assessment and the manager is not afraid to challenge placing authorities where information on young people has not been shared with the home. This ensures clear plans of care are implemented for individual young people who are placed at the home in an emergency.

p.3

This inspection

The inspector was aware during this inspection that a serious incident, which occurred in a school setting, is under investigation by the appropriate authorities. However, at that time there was a significant delay in reporting this to the local authority designated officer. The new manager has re-enforced the procedure with staff to ensure any allegation or suspicion of abuse are reported promptly to effectively safeguard young people.

p.3

This inspection

There is a real commitment from the management and staff team to further raise the standard of care provided to the young people who are living in the home. They have a clear vision and realistic aspirations for the home and in achieving positive outcomes for the young people.

p.3

This inspection

One recommendation has been made at this inspection in relation to staff working effectively with other agencies concerned with child protection. 4 of 5

p.3

Information about this children’s home

This children's home is one of a number of homes operated by a private organisation. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

12/11/2014 Full good 13/03/2014 Interim good progress 24/09/2013 Full adequate 26/03/2013 Interim satisfactory progress

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure the registered person and staff work effectively in partnership with other agencies concerned with child protection e.g. the local authority designated officer. (NMS 4.7) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.4

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.5

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion