Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Muntham House School

Inspected 9 Dec 2015 · URN 126154

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jennie Christopher (lead), Amanda Maxwell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Dec 2015

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amanda Maxwell, Jennie Christopher

  • Postcode verified

    RH13 0NJ

  • Name on report verified

    Muntham House School

  • URN verified

    126154

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrongpositiveeffectivelyvery welloutstandingrobustextremely
Criticismconcernsunsafepoorconcerninadequateat risknot alwaysconcerning

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1056w+68
  • Leadership573w+39
  • Safeguarding585w−26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,182
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 32%Leadership 17%Safeguarding 18%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Muntham House School, Barns Green, HORSHAM, West Sussex, RH13 0NJ

p.1

Inspection dates 09/12/2015 to 11/12/2015

p.1

Good 2

The quality of care and support Good 2 How well children and young people are protected Good 2 The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good 2

p.1

The residential provision is good because

Young people make very strong progress through using the residential provision within the school. They develop skills to respect and tolerate each other through staff’s positive role modelling. Young people make great strides in their personal development by working towards the joint objectives agreed by residential and education staff. Their confidence increases as a result and their behaviour improves. Multi-disciplinary monitoring and graph-based analysis demonstrate success in an accessible visual format for students and staff. The vast majority of young people say they feel safe in the residential provision. Staff have an excellent understanding of why young people may feel unsafe and do all they can to support those individuals. There is a proactive approach to student risk management, allowing them to participate fully in activities they enjoy. Policies and procedures are robust and thoughtfully updated in response to incidents or concerns.

p.1

The residential provision is good because

The leadership and management of the residential provision is strong. Established systems run smoothly on a day-to-day basis, although the most up to date plans and information are not always available in all students care files. A highly motivated and experienced care staff group operate very well together as a supportive team. Staff are well qualified and trained to meet the needs of the young people they care for. The quality of care is excellent with students clearly benefiting socially and educationally from the residential experience. Staff ensure young people are ready to learn and liaise with education staff at the beginning and end of the school day. This enables students to make extremely good progress socially and emotionally during their time at the school. Pre-placement and transitional arrangements are tailored to each young person’s assessed needs. The whole-school approach towards meeting the needs of residential

p.1

The residential provision is good because

students is seamless. Staff communicate and work effectively with specialists employed by the school, external professionals and parents and carers. This promotes consistency in care, while understanding the needs, progress and development of each young person.

p.1

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

The school meets the national minimum standards for residential special schools

p.2

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

What does the school need to do to improve further?

p.2

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

 Establish a system to audit medication and medical supplies, to monitor stocks, quantity and use-before dates.

p.2

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

 Risk management of staff in issues of safeguarding should be formally recorded on personnel files.

p.2

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

 Implement a clear system for monitoring staff who are employed conditionally. Further, agree a timescale for which these arrangements can continue. This specifically relates to staff working in the school while references are still being sought.

p.2

Compliance with the national minimum standards for residential special schools

 Ensure all gas cookers within the school are regularly tested for safety. Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 2 of 11

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspection was announced, by telephone, to the Principal of school on the morning of the first day. An initial meeting was held with the Principal and head of care. Inspectors held discussions with: residential care staff; the senior leadership team; the deputy head of safeguarding; the site manager; speech and language and emotional well-being therapists; the safeguarding governor; and the head of governors. Inspectors observed, and when appropriate took part in, activities with young people in addition to having group and individual discussions with them. Inspectors held telephone discussions with parents and had email contact with the Local Authority Designated Officer and a social worker. A range of documents and records were also examined during the inspection. Questionnaires for residential students and staff were distributed during the inspection and the information gathered was evaluated and any lines of

p.3

Information about this inspection

enquiry followed up with relevant staff. A range of documents and records were also examined during the inspection.

p.3

Inspection team

Jennie Christopher Lead social care inspector Amanda Maxwell Social care inspector Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 3 of 11

p.3

Information about this school

The school is a non-maintained residential special school for up to 56 boys aged between 8 and 19 years, of whom 48 may be boarders. At this inspection there were 29 residential pupils. It is a designated school for pupils with social, emotional and mental health difficulties who may in addition have Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or present on the autistic spectrum. All pupils have a statement of special educational needs. The school buildings are set in extensive grounds. Accommodation is located in the main building and in a separate building for the sixth form. There are numerous areas for the pupils to enjoy activities. The school was last inspected on 13-15 January 2015. Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 4 of 11

p.4

Good

Young people make good academic and personal progress as a result of using the residential provision. They learn life skills, such as how to share and live with others. They learn to respect each other’s differences and behaviours, while understanding how their behaviour may impact on others. Accessing the residential provision is key in developing key skills for adulthood including cooking, cleaning and personal care. Young people’s development and progress is clearly displayed in their outcomes wheel, a graph based depiction of targets and success. Joint working across all departments within the school ensures individual targets and goals remain relevant, while stretching young people to achieve further.

p.5

Good

Young people are afforded the opportunity to share their views through various means, including the student council, key work sessions and residential area meetings. They feel listened to and that staff care about their ideas. Young people mostly say they enjoy the residential aspect of their education. Those who comment negatively say that the school and staff are not an issue, but they would rather be at home. Those who are experiencing crisis are supported to manage their emotions and changes within their life. Many students are proud of their achievements and are keen to show their awards.

p.5

Good

Safeguarding is viewed as integral to the healthy development of young people. They generally understand how to keep themselves safe, in line with their age and understanding. Curriculum days, outcomes wheels and general discussions demonstrate individual’s skills and knowledge of keeping safe, with topics covering sexual health and relationships, radicalisation and substance misuse.

p.5

Good

Leaders and managers have a sound understanding of the strengths within the service, but also the weaknesses and shortfalls. The school’s evaluation is reflective and allows staff to input their views on how and where change can be implemented.

p.5

Good

The residential provision is run with young people in mind. They are held central to the organisation of evening activities, with adequate staffing to ensure safety during activities and free time. Planned activities are for the benefit of young people and not reliant on staff choice or preference.

p.5

Good

Health care arrangements are sound and young people know who to approach with specific health and well-being concerns. The therapy team work closely with staff to ensure individuals’ emotional and physical needs are met.

p.5

The quality of care and support Good

The quality of care and support for young people is very good. Staff have an excellent understanding of individual’s needs and vulnerabilities. They take time to listen to each young person and ensure their views are recorded and when appropriate, acted upon. Staff respond positively to ideas and are flexible in their approach to care. Young people know how to access external advocacy agencies and the school’s independent listener. Young people say they are confident staff will listen to them and respond to any issues they may raise. Residential plans are of a good quality, although the most up to date version was not available in some files. Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 5 of 11 However, this had limited impact on the care provided. Evaluation of plans and the impact of accessing the residential provision is excellent. Outcomes wheels effectively demonstrate the progress made.

p.5

The quality of care and support Good

Young people are treated with dignity and respect and learn to develop the skills to celebrate who they are. Differing cultures and religions are explored through varied activities including the Spanish day taking place during the inspection. Young people experience the music, food and customs of the country they are exploring. Additionally young people are encouraged to consider those who are less fortunate than themselves and are actively involved in various charity and fund raising events. Discriminatory language and behaviour is robustly challenged and monitored to determine if it is indicative of a wider concern, including radicalisation.

p.6

The quality of care and support Good

Staff have excellent links with the education and therapy teams within the school in addition to strong joint working with external agencies. They liaise effectively with parents to ensure as positive an experience as possible for young people. Individuals who may be displaying concerning behaviour are discussed in multi-disciplinary meetings, including the therapy and support teams. Effective care and support packages are developed as a response. A particular strength within the school are the ‘Ready 2 Learn’ and therapy teams, which allow young people the time to prepare and collect themselves emotionally before continuing with the next part of their day. Early intervention through these teams is key in producing positive outcomes for young people.

p.6

The quality of care and support Good

Young people are supported to understand healthy lifestyles and what this means for them. They engage in a wide range of socially and physically stimulating activities, such as football, scuba diving and judo and arts, crafts and board games. They are encouraged to eat healthily and learn to make meals with fresh produce. Young people develop an understanding of physical and emotional well-being and positive relationships. External specialist services, such as substance misuse workers, engage young people alone or in a group, and staff reinforce these messages within the residential provision. Medication administration is safe, with staff training in safe administration. There currently is not a secure audit of medication and first aid supplies, with some homely remedies and dressings being out of date.

p.6

The quality of care and support Good

The residential area is well maintained and decorated. It has a homely feel with a variety of soft furnishings in line with individual tastes. Young people bring items from home, and the atmosphere is calm and warm. Meal times are social with some young people cooking for themselves or the group. Young people are able to contact their parents or carers at any time. Those consulted were extremely positive about the school and the progress their children had made, commenting positively on the quality and dedication of staff in the residential provision.

p.6

How well children and young people are protected Good

Young people demonstrated that they feel safe in the school, and particularly in the residential provision. Those who indicate they do not feel safe for any reason, are effectively supported and protected by staff to overcome their worries or concerns. Staff recognise that safeguarding is a key element of their role and are vigilant to any changes in young people’s demeanour or behaviour. Staff confidently follow prescribed processes should they be concerned for an individual’s welfare. They understand both the school’s local policy and that of the local authority, including key safeguarding personal they would report concerns to in the local authority.

p.6

How well children and young people are protected Good

Records of safeguarding incidents and concerns are a particular strength in the school. They detail subtle changes in behaviour or language, and record who the concern has been raised to both in the school and externally. The school governor charged with safeguarding has many Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 6 of 11 years’ experience in the medical field and a keen understanding of protecting vulnerable people. He has strong oversight and is comfortable challenging any poor practice within the school.

p.6

How well children and young people are protected Good

Concerns are reported to the local authority team charged with safeguarding children and young people. The local authority officer is confident in the school’s transparency and reporting of concerns. Current, protracted investigations into issues of staff suitability require the decision- making process for continued staff deployment to be consolidated, to show how decisions have been reached.

p.7

How well children and young people are protected Good

Young people who are risk of going missing benefit from extra staff support, to further ensure their safety. Staff encourage them to understand the risks they are taking and how they may be unsafe away from adults in the community. Policies in relation to this are clear and responses to those who are missing are robust. Staff will follow individuals and search for them in known locations, while calling the police if necessary.

p.7

How well children and young people are protected Good

Young people who have misused substances have the opportunity to work alongside external specialist agencies and therapists within the school. All are supported through the curriculum and ad hoc discussions with staff to protect themselves from risks and harm. Additionally these sessions provide young people with knowledge to raise awareness of bullying, radicalisation, homophobia and other discriminatory behaviours. E-safety is a key topic area due to the vulnerability of many of the students. The school’s processes protect young people from accessing unsuitable content.

p.7

How well children and young people are protected Good

Positive behaviour is promoted throughout the school. A recognised on-line system monitors behaviour trends and patterns in all protective areas and, alongside the outcomes wheel, helps to identify those who may be at risk of exploitation, grooming, radicalisation and other vulnerabilities. Staff are skilled in managing unwanted behaviour and use diversion and redirection. Young people have the opportunity to work through their distress in a safe space, with time to reflect on how their behaviour may impact on others.

p.7

How well children and young people are protected Good

Individual risk assessments afford young people the opportunity to take age-appropriate risks in line with their peers. Staff are not risk averse and allow individuals to make informed choices on their safety, including unaccompanied trips for older students. The buildings and grounds are well maintained and assessed. Boilers are tested for safety, although two gas cookers have not been examined within the last year. Young people are protected from avoidable risks through regular tests of the fire alarm and firefighting equipment. Staff vetting is robust, although there is no clear assessment of those who are employed conditionally and no determined date for how long these arrangements can remain in place.

p.7

The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

The leadership and management of the residential provision is strong. The service is effectively run by an enthusiastic head of care, who has relevant qualifications and experience. A highly motivated and experienced care staff group operate very well together as a supportive team. They are well qualified and trained to meet the needs of the young people they care for. Staff understand the aims and ethos of the service and ensure the residential experience is central to the progress pf young people. They have high aspirations for those they care for and expect high quality work from each other. They feel supported by managers and the senior team, and also by each other.

p.7

The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

Staff have an excellent understanding of their roles and responsibilities in improving outcomes and progress of young people. They work cohesively as a team, but also jointly with external Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 7 of 11 partner agencies and parents. Social workers comment positively about the school and state the school remedies any issues swiftly.

p.7

The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

Leaders and managers monitor the quality of the service provided through regular reviews and self-evaluation. Staff are key to this process and have the opportunity to contribute to development plans across the school. There have been difficulties in sourcing an appropriate independent visitor to monitor the residential provision. A visitor has been appointed since the autumn term. Interim arrangements included members of the governing body visiting the school unannounced. All governors have a strong presence within the school, regularly visiting for sub- groups and committee meetings.

p.8

The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

There have been no formal complaints to the school since the last residential inspection. Low level issues in friendships or disagreements between staff and young people are managed through a restorative approach and recorded effectively to demonstrate agreements made.

p.8

The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good

Policies and procedures are available to all staff in the school. They are regularly updated and reflect changes both locally and nationally. They provide staff with key information on how to conduct their roles safely and consistently across the school. Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 8 of 11

p.8

What inspection judgements mean

The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against Inspections of boarding and residential provision in schools: the inspection framework.

p.9

Judgement Description

Outstanding A school where the experiences and progress of children and young people consistently exceeds the standard of good and results in sustained progress and achievement. The outcomes achieved by children and young people are outstanding and the impact the boarding/residential provision has had in supporting this progress and achieving these outcomes is clearly evidenced. Good A school providing effective services which exceed minimum requirements. Children and young people are protected and cared for and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. Requires improvement A school where there are no serious or widespread failures that result in children and young people's welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. However, the overall outcomes, experiences and progress of children and young people are not yet good. Inadequate A school where there are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected or their welfare is not

p.9

Judgement Description

promoted or safeguarded or if their care and experiences are poor and they are not making progress. Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 9 of 11

p.9

School details

Unique reference number 126154 Social care unique reference number SC014636

p.10

DfE registration number

This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989, as amended by the Care Standards Act 2000, having regard to the national minimum standards for residential special schools. Type of school Residential Special School Number of boarders on roll 53 Gender of boarders Boys Age range of boarders 8 to19

p.10

Head teacher

Date of previous boarding inspection 13/01/2015 Telephone number 01403 730302

p.10

Email address

Inspection Report Muntham House School, 09/12/2015 Page 10 of 11 guidance 'raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/ofsted." If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.11

Email address

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Email address

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Email address

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.11

Email address

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.11

Email address

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.co.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion