Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Beis Malka Girls' School

Inspected 15 Jul 2015 · published 2 Dec 2015 · URN 100295

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Vanessa Ward (lead), John Seal

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jul 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    John Seal, Vanessa Ward

  • Postcode verified

    N16 6XD

  • Name on report verified

    Beis Malka Girls' School

  • URN verified

    100295

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependentpositivelyconsistentlyaccuratelyeffectivelyclear
Criticismlimitedlackinsufficientout of datenot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings815w−41
  • What needs to improve302w+73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,082
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Reason for the inspection

 This emergency inspection was commissioned by the Department for Education to report on the school’s compliance with the whole or specified parts of Parts 1, 2, 3 and 8 of the the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.  The inspection focused on the following parts of the Independent School Standards: Part 1: Quality of education, paragraphs 2(1)(b)(ii), 2(2)(d), 2(2)e, 2(2)(i) and 3(i); the whole of Part 2: Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils; Part 3: Welfare, health and safety of pupils, paragraphs 7(a) and 7(b) particularly focusing on the wording of the school’s safeguarding policy; the whole of Part 8: Quality of leadership and management.  The inspection was conducted without notice.

p.1

Main findings

 The school’s curriculum reflects the school’s aim and ethos which, in the headteacher’s words, is ‘to provide an Hasidic orthodox education to the pupils with clear guidance on how to live their lives and which covers all aspects of life’.  Leaders subscribe strictly to the values and ethos of the Orthodox Jewish faith. Leaders consider that the precepts of their faith take precedence over the requirements of the Independent School Standards.  The headteacher works closely with governors, some of whom have dedicated office space within the school.  The school’s curriculum covers a range of subjects which includes English, mathematics, science, art, Hebrew, accounting and physical education (PE). GCSE science is limited to the single award. There are no opportunities for students to sit separate single science subjects, or double and triple award science, at GCSE.  The school’s written policies, plans and practice promote some aspects of fundamental British

p.1

Main findings

values. Displays around the school are simultaneously written in English and Hebrew; these reflect life in modern Britain with particular emphasis on community, the recent general election and citizenship.  The school’s personal, social, health and economic education (PSHEE) programme encourages pupils to show respect for other people in a general sense. However, it does not pay particular regard to all of the protected characteristics set out in the Equality Act 2010.  Pupils speak generally, but articulately, about respect, democracy and the rule of law and know the difference between the civil and criminal justice systems. They know about a range of different faiths and beliefs. In discussion, pupils emphasised the importance of respecting difference and were able to give limited examples of what ‘difference’ means, for example age, skin colour, looks and disability.  However, pupils were not able to give any further examples regarding ‘difference’. The

p.1

Main findings

headteacher accurately predicted the pupils’ lack of knowledge about homophobic bullying, because ‘they wouldn’t know that word’.  Leaders deliberately prohibit teaching about, or any reference to, certain protected Emergency inspection: Beis Malka Girls' School, 15 July 2015 2 of 6

p.1

Main findings

characteristics, for example sexual orientation or preference. The school’s justification for this is that acknowledgement of these characteristics contravenes the school’s ethos. The headteacher commented, ‘If we had to teach that we would have to close as an orthodox school.’  Careers guidance provided by the school is limited in scope. It does not help pupils to fulfil their potential because they are not aware of the range of options available to them. As a result, 28 current Year 11 leavers have chosen to go to an Orthodox Jewish seminary and the remaining three leavers are going to Israel.  Some pupils participate in a volunteering programme. However, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that pupils are able to contribute positively and more widely to society outside their faith community.  The school’s safeguarding policy does not meet requirements. It refers to guidance and documents on safeguarding and safer recruitment which are out of date and refer to

p.2

Main findings

terminology no longer in use.  The safeguarding policy does not contain a job description for the three designated safeguarding leads in the school. If an accusation were to be made against the headteacher, the policy states that the Chair of Governors would ‘take responsibility for dealing with the issue’. However, the policy is vague on what action the Chair of Governors should take.  The designated child protection leads do not have robust knowledge of the latest guidance from the Department for Education. As a result, arrangements are not securely in place to safeguard and promote the safety and welfare of pupils at the school.  The single central record meets requirements; however, it is not formally or systematically checked by senior leaders.  The admissions register for the school does not meet requirements. There are almost no entries in the ‘Details of Leaving’ column and are limited to recording ‘Israel’ or ‘went abroad’.

p.2

Main findings

 The school site contains an unregistered crèche.  Because a significant number of independent school standards were found to be unmet, including those for safeguarding, inspectors judged that the school was also failing to meet the standards relating to leadership and management.

p.2

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

 Ensure that leaders pay particular regard to all of the protected characteristics of the Equality Act 2010 in the planning and delivery of the school’s PSHE and spiritual, moral, social and cultural programmes. (Paragraphs 2(2)(d)(ii) and 5(b)(vi))  Ensure that pupils have access to impartial careers advice that enables them to make informed choices and helps to encourage them to fulfil their potential. (Paragraph 2(2)(e))  Ensure that teaching does not undermine fundamental British values, particularly respect for people of all protected characteristics as set out in part 6 of the 2010 Act. (Paragraph 3(i) and 3(j))  Ensure that pupils have the opportunity to contribute positively to society more widely. (Paragraph 5(b)(iii))  Ensure that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school by ensuring the safeguarding policy and other related policies are up to date and that the

p.2

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

designated child protection leads have job descriptions which they fully understand. (Paragraph 7(a) and 7(b))  Ensure that the crèche on the school site is registered and operates in accordance with relevant legislation. (Paragraph 7(a) and 7(b))  Ensure that the admission register accurately records the details of destinations of leavers. (Paragraph 15) Emergency inspection: Beis Malka Girls' School, 15 July 2015 3 of 6

p.2

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

 Ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently. ( Paragraph 34(1)(a))  Ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently.(Paragraph 34(1)(b))  Ensure that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school actively promote the well-being of pupils.(Paragraph 34(1)(c)) Emergency inspection: Beis Malka Girls' School, 15 July 2015 4 of 6

p.3

Inspection team

Vanessa Ward, Lead Inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector John Seal Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Information about this school

 Beis Malka Girls’ School is an independent Orthodox Jewish day school for girls located in Stoke Newington in the London Borough of Hackney.  The school has 479 pupils on roll aged from three to 16.  The school opened in 1980 and was last inspected by Ofsted in October 2013, when its overall effectiveness was judged to be good.  The school has separate secondary, primary and early years provision. The secondary and primary provision is housed on the site where the inspection took place. The early years provision is located on a separate site and did not form part of this inspection.  The main school site also contains a crèche for children aged four months to two years. The school confirmed that the crèche is unregistered. On the morning of inspection, 29 babies and young children were in attendance. The school asserted that the crèche is solely for the childcare of children of members of staff and that no child remains for more than four hours per

p.4

Information about this school

day. The crèche manager did state that it was possible that some babies or young children may on occasion remain in the crèche for longer than four hours a day.  The school has 46 pupils with additional or special needs.  The school has applied to be a state-funded school. Emergency inspection: Beis Malka Girls' School, 15 July 2015 5 of 6

p.4

School details

Unique reference number 100295 Inspection number 465132 DfE registration number 204/6337 This inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. It was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. Type of school Orthodox Jewish Day School School status Independent school Age range of pupils 3–16 Gender of pupils Girls Number of pupils on the school roll 479 Number of part time pupils None Proprietor Mr A Grosman Chair Mr A Grosman Headteacher Mrs Wind – Secondary School Mrs Sheinfield – Primary School Date of previous school inspection 15–17 October 2013 Annual fees (day pupils) £2,080 Telephone number 0208 806 2070 Fax number 0208 806 1719 Email address mail@beismalka.com Emergency inspection: Beis Malka Girls' School, 15 July 2015 6 of 6

p.5

School details

guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.6

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

School details

inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit

p.6

School details

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.6

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion