Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Children Assisted in a Real Environment Ltd in Hammersmith and Fulham

Inspected 1 Jun 2015 · URN SC063219

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Jun 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Kennet

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    W3 7HF

  • URN verified

    SC063219

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectiveexcellentimprovedhighly effectiveexcellent relationshipshigh expectationsoutstanding
Criticismnot yetat riskinadequateweaknessweakharmconcernsnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings295w+74
  • What needs to improve1123w−36

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
1,406
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 51
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 34%About the inspection 57%

Full report text

Good

The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.2

The children's home provision is good because:

 One of the key strengths of this home is how staff form and build excellent relationships with young people. They hold high expectations of young people and promote an encouraging environment.  An excellent core group of staff, who are well qualified and experienced, provide positive role models. This promotes effective individual work with young people. There is evidence of improvement and positive change in their lives. Positive behaviour is promoted and healthy attitudes are developed.  Young people say they feel safe, listened-to and well respected. The home environment and atmosphere feels relaxed.  There are good networks with professionals involved in young people’s day-to-day care, all of whom give positive feedback on how the home and staff help and support young people.  Communication is improving with wider professionals to develop better liaison with safeguarding partners, such as the local authority designated

p.3

The children's home provision is good because:

officer, the local child protection team, the police and the local safeguarding children board. Progress to develop strong links, which help to identify local issues and share information, will allow better protection for young people.  Not all young people have looked after care plans from their placing authorities on their files. The Registered Manager and staff continue to challenge this position. The staff team are clear about overall plans for young people.  Staff are not yet in receipt of regular and reflective supervision to support their work, neither are they having their performance appraised to ensure practice issues and development is progressed.  The Registered Manager has not yet updated some policies to reflect the new regulations, for example the children’s handbook and the statement of purpose. No young people are at risk as a result.

p.3

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

12. The protection of children standard.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard with particular reference to the updating of the safeguarding policy and location assessment, the Registered Manager must ensure:

p.4

Requirement Due date

12.(2) In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to ensure –

p.4

Requirement Due date

(c) that the premises used for the purposes of the home are located so that children are effectively safeguarded;

p.4

Requirement Due date

(e) that the effectiveness of the home’s child protection policies is monitored regularly. 31/12/2015

p.4

Requirement Due date

13. The leadership and management standard.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard with specific reference to seeking feedback from young people, the Registered Manager must:

p.4

Requirement Due date

13.−(2) In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to –

p.4

Requirement Due date

(g) demonstrate that practice in the home is informed and improved by taking into account and acting on−

p.4

Requirement Due date

(ii) feedback on the experiences of children, including complaints received; 31/12/2015

p.4

Requirement Due date

Employment of staff. (Regulation 33.−(4)(b)(c))

p.4

Requirement Due date

33.−(4) The registered person must ensure that all employees− 31/12/2015 (b) receive practice-related supervision by a person with appropriate experience; and

p.4

Requirement Due date

(c) have their performance and fitness to perform their roles appraised at least once every year.

p.5

Requirement Due date

Statement of Purpose. (Regulation 16 (3)(a)) 16.(3) The registered person must – (a) keep the statement of purpose under review and, where appropriate, revise it; (Regulation 16 (3)(a)) 31/12/2015

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure the requirements of the protection of children standard, the registered person has specific responsibilities under regulation 34 to prepare and implement policies setting out: the policy on protection of children from abuse and neglect should include arrangements in relation to e-safety and to counter risks of self-harm and suicide. All policies should be reviewed regularly and revised where appropriate. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 44, paragraph 9.19)

p.5

Recommendations

 To ensure continued improvement under regulation 5, children’s homes need to connect with and be part of the wider support system for each child in their care. No children’s home will be able to meet, on its own, all of the child’s needs. It is crucial that the home works in close partnership with all those who play a role in protecting and caring for the child, but particularly the child’s local authority and statutory social worker. The registered person and the staff of the home cannot force a relevant person to engage or work productively with them and the regulation does not require this. The registered person should evidence what they have done to achieve engagement, including any actions taken to escalate concerns. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 11, paragraph 2.3)

p.5

Information about this children's home

The home was registered in 2005 to provide residential care and support for up to five young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties and who present with challenging behaviour. The home is owned and operated by a private organisation that has another registered home in the area. One Registered Manager is in charge of both homes.

p.6

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.6

Recent inspection history

18/02/2015 Interim Sustained effectiveness

p.6

Recent inspection history

27/02/2014 Interim Satisfactory progress

p.6

GOOD

The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.7

GOOD

One of the main strengths of this home is the emphasis on positive relationships between staff and young people. This extends to the relationships between the young people also and was emphasised well when one young person said, ‘I love it here, the staff look out for you and the boys get along, you feel like it’s your own home, it feels like a place you can relax.’

p.7

GOOD

All the young people say they feel safe and relaxed living in the home and when going out into the surrounding community. They know how to complain if they are not satisfied. They are able to invite friends and family to visit and feel comfortable doing so. One young person confirms they do not feel embarrassed about living in a children’s home; they often bring friends to visit and feet relaxed about this.

p.7

GOOD

All young people are automatically given gym and library membership. They have access to a computer for homework and Wi-Fi. Staff switch the Wi-Fi off at 10.30pm, which all the young people understand. Young people agreed after discussions about why this was necessary and accepted this. One young person says, ‘before it was switched off, I played games all night and didn’t get up for school.’

p.7

GOOD

There is an emphasis on praise in this home and encouragement to have a say in organised and essential activities. A positive reward system gives young people the option to earn additional money for chores and good behaviour. Young people attend monthly meetings where they discuss and plan activities. Regular outings are organised; for example, during half term, staff and young people visited Southend-On-Sea and last summer they went camping at Clacton. At monthly meetings with staff, young people also plan a choice of menus and they are encouraged to help with cooking. One young person has cooked recently for the whole house, planning and preparing the meal with support from staff.

p.7

GOOD

Young people’s diversity and identity needs met in this home. The staff group reflect the young people’s diverse mix of backgrounds. Consideration to dietary and religious needs ensures young people feel valued and respected. Two of the young people have required interpreters to support them in the past; both young people have progressed so well with learning English that this support is not required. Staff have sought community networks locally to support young people with their cultural, language and religious needs. All of the above support has helped young people to communicate, learn, integrate and feel settled.

p.7

GOOD

All the young people living here are on role at a school, college or a pupil referral unit and all attend regularly. There are high expectations for progressing in education, regardless of starting points and young people respond well to this expectation and are motivated. Positive behaviour is rewarded and celebrated.

p.8

GOOD

There is a range of successes for the young people here, including gaining language skills, attending work experience, applying for an apprenticeships and working part-time.

p.8

GOOD

There is evidence of excellent networking between staff and professionals involved in the young people’s care to ensure that care planning is progressed and communication is effective. One social worker reports that the relationships developed with staff are excellent, that the young person concerned speaks very highly of staff and his case was seen as a model of good practice with the local authority councillors. Another professional from the virtual school stated, ‘Communication is really superb, they contact me on all issues, it’s really refreshing, and it would be nice if all our young people were there.’

p.8

GOOD

Independent living skills are encouraged and supported by staff. Young people gain basic skills by planning and cooking meals, tidying their own rooms, helping with washing-up and doing their own laundry, all with support to manage such tasks. This encourages a positive sense of self-worth.

p.8

GOOD

The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.8

GOOD

Various key documents designed to promote safeguarding are either not in place or require updating, for example the location assessment to identify risks within the local community and/or possible resources to support young people. The safeguarding policy needs updating to cover all possible risk areas. However, no young people are at risk and the key areas are covered.

p.8

GOOD

Day-to-day communication with professionals is excellent; however, pro-active networking on key areas such as young people missing from care, e-safety and understanding risks in the local community is weaker. The Registered Manager is aware of this and is working hard to strengthen these links to keep young people as safe as possible.

p.8

GOOD

The condition and decoration of the home is improved and given the limitations of the property size and layout, it is difficult to make many further improvements. The home have purchased a new kitchen door, which awaits fitting as the current one is hanging-off its hinges. The upstairs bathroom is in need of some decoration as the skirting boards are dusty and the paint chipped in some areas. Otherwise, the home and garden is adequately furnished and maintained and gives a relaxed and comfortable feel.

p.9

GOOD

Young people say they feel safe at their home. The manager and staff are aware they can do more to protect them when out in the community. Risks such as sexual exploitation, gang association and radicalisation are areas where young people are likely to be vulnerable. Staff have not created an understanding between other safeguarding partners so that there can be strong and pro-active responses when needed, helping to reduce the risk of harm and keeping young people as safe as possible.

p.9

GOOD

Young people feel they have good, positive relationships with staff. They know who their key-workers are and enjoy trusting relationships with them. There are good pro-active key-work sessions, linked to young people’s risk assessments. This supports work to minimise identified risks for young people and help them to think about other strategies to contain and manage their behaviour.

p.9

GOOD

Case files contain clear and accurate information. Appropriate referrals to child and adolescent mental health services and psychology services are in progress. When responses are not forthcoming, there is evidence that staff challenge this to ensure young people receive the help they need. Despite this, some care plans are not present on young people’s files. The manager and staff continue to chase local authorities for this information. Without the placing authority plan, day-to-day plans are difficult to make and review. Young people deserve to have their care plans explained to them so they can understand their circumstances, provide feedback and challenge these if they do not agree.

p.9

GOOD

Positive family relationships have been encouraged and supported by staff. It is impressive how pro-active staff had been on behalf of young people and this has supported young people to understand their identity and keep in touch with important people. One independent reviewing officer reported, ‘They have promoted safe family contact, he is positively engaged and diverted from an undesirable lifestyle.’

p.9

GOOD

There have not been any significant episodes of young people going missing. The policy is clear and shows that records are up to date. Staff are doing what is required in their quest to keep young people safe. The allocated social worker had been to visit when one young person returned to the home but there was no offer of a return interview by an independent person. The manager and staff are working to increase their professional network to set-up these processes to safeguard young people further.

p.9

GOOD

There is a clear behaviour management policy and plan in place, which supports positive behaviour. The current mix of young people has responded well to the system of behaviour management used. Restraint is rarely used in this home, with no recorded incidents since the last inspection. Sanctions and incentive management schemes are recorded well. The manager needs to update the behaviour management policy, which still refers to the old regulations. This will further help staff and young people to understand expectations and encourage positive behaviours.

p.10

GOOD

The manager and staff have not done enough to protect young people from risks the internet may pose, for example bullying, grooming, abuse or radicalisation. There is no policy relating to this or guidance for staff.

p.10

GOOD

Robust staff recruitment processes are in place. This protects young people from exposure to unsafe people working in their home.

p.10

GOOD

Adequate precautions to prevent the risk of fires. Safety equipment is in place and there is evidence of regular and compliant checks and fire drills.

p.10

requires improvement

The children's home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.10

requires improvement

There are some areas of weakness within the leadership and management of this service. The Registered Manager manages another home. There is a rota to show when she is available in the home but this is a recent addition, despite being a recommendation at the last inspection, and it remains unclear how much time she spends in this home. There is a deputy manager in post, which is a suitable arrangement for when she is not present. Staff say the Registered Manager is available on the telephone if they need urgent advice. The manager is not consistently monitoring what is going on in the home and this is not helping it to improve. There is still no risk assessment of the location of the home, despite this being required at the two previous inspections.

p.10

requires improvement

The independent monitoring of the home has improved. The independent person’s most recent report gives a better analysis of how the home needs to improve and what areas need to focus on for improvement. Despite this improvement, the manager has not clearly addressed the issues raised and progress continues to be slow.

p.10

requires improvement

The manager’s own monitoring of progress in the home is weak, for example, the manager has recommended in her monitoring report for January that staff appraisals require updating but these remain incomplete.

p.11

requires improvement

The statement of purpose is out of date; it references the other home that the provider runs and does not reflect the new quality standards and regulations. This document does not provide stakeholders with the right information about the service.

p.11

requires improvement

The Registered Manager struggles with the priorities of two services. The deputy manager is currently supervising all the staff members at this home and this is too much responsibility without the support of the manager.

p.11

requires improvement

There is an impressive and experienced core group of staff working at the home. They do not receive effective and regular supervision to assist them in their roles. Supervision agreements are not evident on most staff files and notes of sessions do not address key areas of reflection or progression, but tend to be a record of basic discussions held. Staff do not receive support, development and an opportunity to address practice issues through the appraisal process, as only one member of staff has received an appraisal since 2014.

p.11

What the inspection judgements mean

The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection.

p.12

What the inspection judgements mean

An outstanding children's home provides highly effective services that contribute to significantly improved outcomes for children and young people who need help and protection and care. Their progress exceeds expectations and is sustained over time. A good children's home provides effective services that help, protect and care for children and young people and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. In a children's home that requires improvement , there are no widespread or serious failures that create or leave children being harmed or at risk of harm. The welfare of looked after children is safeguarded and promoted. Minimum requirements are in place, however, the children's home is not yet delivering good protection, help and care for children and young people. A children's home that is inadequate is providing services where there are widespread or serious failures that create or leave children and young people being

p.12

What the inspection judgements mean

harmed or at risk of harm or result in children looked after not having their welfare safeguarded and promoted.

p.12

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's

p.13

Information about this inspection

Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.14

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.14

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.14

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion