Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Peter's CofE Primary School
Summary
Sue Frater (lead), Adam Morris, Rachel Miller
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
11 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Adam Morris, Rachel Miller, Sue Frater
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
PL1 1TP
- Name on report verified
St Peter’s Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
113485
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Excellent attention is given to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. p.1
- Pupils are considerate, polite and eager to learn. p.1
- Children respond well to teachers’ high expectations. p.5
- Pupils are eager to learn and confident to contribute in lessons. p.4
- They say that they feel safe and that staff deal effectively with the very few incidents of bullying that occur in school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement p.1
- Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement p.1
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good p.1
- Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement p.1
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good p.1
- Senior and middle leaders’ skills have not been developed well over time to support the headteacher in sustaining improvements since the previous inspection. p.1
- Leaders are not robustly evaluating the impact of the school’s work on pupils’ achievement. p.1
- Teachers’ use of assessment and feedback is uneven across the school and results in gaps in pupils’ learning in some year groups. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment32
“Pupils respond very well to teachers’ high expectations of their behaviour.” p.4Reading & phonics17
“The most-able pupils make good progress in reading.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 2,371
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Peter’s Church of England Primary School Rendle Street, Plymouth PL1 1TP
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
Senior and middle leaders’ skills have not been developed well over time to support the headteacher in sustaining improvements since the previous inspection. Leaders are not robustly evaluating the impact of the school’s work on pupils’ achievement. Teachers’ use of assessment and feedback is uneven across the school and results in gaps in pupils’ learning in some year groups. Pupils’ progress in writing is not as strong as in reading and mathematics, especially for boys and disadvantaged pupils. The gap in learning between disadvantaged pupils and others in the school and nationally is not closing because not enough attention is given to extending their vocabulary and sentence structure.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher has created a culture in which each pupil is valued and grows in confidence and self-esteem. Excellent attention is given to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils are considerate, polite and eager to learn. The staff take good care of them and are helping them to improve their attendance. The pupils feel safe and behave well. Children get off to a good start in the early years where teachers use their observations to identify and fill gaps in children’s learning. Governors have an in-depth and accurate understanding of the school’s work and are increasingly holding senior leaders to account for the progress of all pupils.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure the quality of teaching is consistently good by: – helping teachers to assess pupils’ progress and to reshape lessons to fill the gaps in learning for individuals and groups – making sure that pupils respond to teachers’ marking and feedback by demonstrating the required improvements in their work. Improve progress in writing across the school, especially for boys and disadvantaged pupils by: – extending their knowledge of words and their use of complex sentences – developing their spelling and handwriting – providing more opportunities for pupils to write in subjects across the curriculum. Develop senior and subject leaders’ skills in monitoring and evaluating the impact of their actions to ensure consistently good progress in all subjects and for all pupils.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium is recommended.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
As the main leader with responsibility for safeguarding, the headteacher has a large and increasing workload in supporting children and families. She does this exceptionally well, but it has reduced her time to maintain a strategic overview of the school’s performance, and improvements have not been sustained since the previous inspection. In response to a request from the governors, more responsibilities were delegated to other staff over the past year. However, the headteacher retains a heavy safeguarding workload and there is no clear overall lead to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Until recently, senior and subject leaders were not trained to take on more responsibilities. Part-time subject leaders for literacy and numeracy are now developing appropriate monitoring and evaluation skills. They carry out lesson observations and examine pupils’ books and progress information. They use this information to identify key areas to improve. They also hold meetings with teachers to
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
identify any underachieving pupils and, when necessary, decide what additional support should be provided. The impact of their work is most noticeable in mathematics. Strategies to improve writing are too recent to have made any significant difference to pupils’ progress. The school has recently introduced a new progress tracking system to support teachers in making better use of their assessments. As yet, the information has not been evaluated robustly to give a clear enough indication of the progress of different groups of pupils. As a result, the school is not evaluating the impact of its use of the pupil premium on the progress of eligible pupils, and these disadvantaged pupils are not achieving as well as they should. The successful implementation of the new curriculum has helped teachers to identify gaps in pupils’ learning. This, together with their performance management which is linked clearly to pupils’ progress, is
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
raising their expectations of what pupils can achieve. The broad and balanced curriculum is enhanced by a wide range of visits and trips, including a recent trip to Barcelona, to extend pupils’ experiences. Effective use is made of the physical education and sport premium to provide training for staff and additional activities for pupils, including the opportunity for more year groups to attend swimming lessons. Pupils enjoy opportunities to participate in sporting tournaments and to sing in concerts. The British values of democracy, the rule of law, and respect and tolerance of others are promoted very well, including through displays to which pupils have clearly made a strong contribution. Pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Activities such as learning about other faiths and cultures, discussing how to treat others, engaging in social activities and school visits, and participating in cultural activities, including singing in concerts,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
make an excellent contribution to pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. All leaders and staff lead by example to create a culture of respect and tolerance. The culture is embedded well, with pupils from a range of social and cultural backgrounds gaining in confidence and self-esteem. All parents who responded to Ofsted’s online Parent View survey would recommend the school to others. The school draws on a range of support with varying success. The support includes monitoring visits from the local authority leadership adviser, moderation of early years assessments, support for the early years and literacy strategies from a local leader of education, and training in mathematics from Plymouth Teaching School Alliance. The governance of the school: – is not challenging robustly enough the impact of the school’s use of the pupil premium on the progress of disadvantaged pupils
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
– has an in-depth knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement through frequent visits to the school and observing the pupils’ learning and progress, for example in their books – holds senior leaders increasingly to account for all aspects of the school’s performance, including the progress of all pupils in each year group – keeps up to date with the latest safeguarding requirements and attends relevant training, including raising awareness of safer recruitment procedures. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The policy is up to date with the latest government requirements and all staff are trained at appropriate levels. Staff are also trained in preventing radicalisation and extremism. A team of staff have recently been trained specifically to support the headteacher in meeting the high volume of pupils’ safeguarding needs. Concerns are reported appropriately and the pupils supported very well. A support worker is helping parents to improve their children’s
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
attendance, with good results. All required checks on adults to work with pupils are carried out and recorded suitably. Safer recruitment procedures meet requirements, but staff files are not well organised.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Teachers’ use of assessment to check and extend the understanding of all pupils is not effective across all year groups. Over time, this has led to gaps in pupils’ learning, for example in mathematical calculations and in writing. Teachers assess pupils’ progress in writing against a list of statements. Their feedback does not always help pupils to know precisely what to do to improve their work. This results in pupils in several year groups not progressing to writing more complex sentences. Across subjects, teachers are not checking that pupils respond to their feedback and improve their work. Not all teachers are checking the understanding of pupils during lessons, addressing misconceptions and adapting the provision to sustain good progress for all. This practice is improving in mathematics due to effective training for staff. For example, in a Year 5 class, the teacher set clear expectations according to
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
pupils’ different starting points and demonstrated these well. A few pupils used addition rather than division to work out the price of each theatre ticket from the total cost for 17 people. The teacher spotted this and quickly took action to support their learning. Through the use of skilful questioning the teacher checked that the pupils understood and were able to apply the new skills they had learned. The teaching of phonics (letters and their sounds) is particularly effective in the early years where teachers give children lots of opportunities to apply their learning in a range of reading and writing activities. The teaching of phonics is improving in Year 1. Across the school, the teaching of reading is effective. Pupils apply their knowledge of phonics and various strategies to understand what they are reading. Teachers make good use of resources and set appropriate homework, although pupils do not always
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
complete it. Most teaching assistants are skilled in questioning the pupils to think for themselves and to extend their responses. School reports provide a good level of information for parents on their children’s progress and attendance. They set out what pupils can do in each subject and whether they are working at the expected level in reading, writing and mathematics. They also include suitable targets for the next year. Pupils respond very well to teachers’ high expectations of their behaviour.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils are eager to learn and confident to contribute in lessons. They enjoy discussions and show respect for others’ ideas and views. Pupils respect the very positive relationships they share with their teachers. Pupils’ attendance, which was below average, is now improving due to the school’s work with parents and a new system of rewards.
p.4
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils conduct themselves well throughout the day, including at break and lunchtime. They are considerate and automatically hold doors open for others. Lessons are rarely disrupted by inappropriate behaviour. Pupils can explain the school’s sanctions for unacceptable behaviour, and records show that pupils with behavioural needs learn self-control. A small number of parents, staff and pupils do not agree that behaviour is good. Pupils say that quarrels occasionally break out in the playground, especially when fewer staff are on duty, but that staff sort them out promptly. This is reflected in the school’s records. Pupils learn how to keep safe, for example through role play and other activities about bullying, including cyber bullying. They say that they feel safe and that staff deal effectively with the very few incidents of bullying that occur in school. Parents agree that their children are safe.
p.4
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
Pupils’ progress is uneven across year groups due to inconsistency in teachers’ use of assessment information. Pupils’ progress in writing, and in grammar, punctuation, spelling and handwriting, is not as strong as in other subjects, especially for boys and disadvantaged pupils. The school has identified this as a priority for improvement. Fewer pupils make more than expected progress from their different starting points in writing, compared to national figures. By the end of key stage 1, pupils when writing can join two ideas together to form compound sentences. However, it is not until Year 6 that pupils begin to write in more complex sentences. To help pupils to learn more words to describe their thoughts, the school has introduced an approach involving talking prior to writing, but it is too recent to have made any significant difference. There are too few opportunities for all pupils to apply their newly acquired writing skills in other subjects to help
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
them to remember and, as a result, they are not well prepared for secondary school. Attainment in the Year 1 phonics screening check was below the national average in 2015. However, current pupils in Year 1 are doing well in developing their knowledge of phonics to support their reading. Throughout the school, pupils read regularly and make good progress, with a higher proportion making more than expected progress compared to national figures. Pupils’ progress in mathematics is improving due to the training that staff have received. However, gaps in pupils’ prior knowledge and understanding are continuing to impede the progress of some. Pupils who speak English as an additional language quickly gain confidence and learn to communicate well verbally. The provision of visual and practical resources, especially in mathematics, helps them to access the curriculum and to progress as well as others.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
Pupils who have special educational needs or disability make good progress as their specific needs are identified and met in lessons and in intervention sessions. The most-able pupils make good progress in reading. Their progress in mathematics is also improving due to more challenging work and a greater emphasis on setting appropriate problem-solving activities.
p.5
Early years provision is good
Strong leadership of the early years provision ensures the evaluation of children’s progress is accurate and key priorities for improvement are identified, such as communication and language. Staff training is focused on developing the children’s communication skills. The early years curriculum has been reviewed effectively to include a story-based approach to learning to develop children’s use of language. All staff are aware of the expected outcomes and areas of learning to target in lessons. Observations and assessments inform the next steps for individual children. The impact of this is seen in the improving trend in children’s good level of development, from a low baseline. The trend is catching up with the national average, although more slowly for disadvantaged pupils. The accuracy of assessments is confirmed by a local authority adviser. Children are prepared well for Year 1. The teaching of phonics is effective and children are quickly learning their letters and sounds. Staff help
p.5
Early years provision is good
parents to support their children, for example through modelling how to listen to their children reading. Children respond well to teachers’ high expectations. For instance, they eagerly wrote their own versions of the story of ‘The Very Hungry Caterpillar’ and counted the number of different fruits they used in making fruit kebabs. They made good use of the outdoor area to explore and learn about plants that caterpillars might eat. Good attention is given to the children’s welfare and safety. A high number of staff are employed and the individual needs of the pupils, including the two-year-olds, are met. Children quickly settle into routines and learn to work and play together well.
p.5
School details
Unique reference number 113485 Local authority Plymouth Inspection number 10005515 This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.6
School details
Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 2–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 186 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Father David Way Headteacher Jan Digweed Telephone number 01752 667724 Website www.st-peterscofe.plymouth.sch.uk Email address j.digweed@st-peterscofe.plymouth.sch.uk Date of previous inspection 6–7 July 2011
p.6
Information about this school
The school is smaller than most primary schools. A high proportion of pupils are eligible for support from the pupil premium. The pupil premium is additional government funding provided for pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals or who are looked after. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is high, as is the number of pupils who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs or disability is broadly average. Their needs relate mainly to moderate learning difficulties. Children in the early years are taught part time in the Nursery and full time in the Reception class. Since the previous inspection, there have been changes in staff and the school now admits two-year-olds. The school is being supported by a local leader of education, who is the headteacher of Yealmpstone Farm Primary School. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for
p.6
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed 17 lessons taught by eight teachers. Some of the lessons were observed jointly with the headteacher. The inspectors examined pupils’ work and listened to small groups of pupils reading. The inspectors held meetings with a group of pupils, senior and middle leaders, the headteacher and members of the governing body. They also met informally with some parents. The inspectors observed the school’s work. They examined a range of documents, including those relating to school self-evaluation, improvement planning, the safeguarding of pupils, and information on the monitoring and evaluation of pupils’ progress, attendance and behaviour. The inspectors took account of 17 responses to Ofsted’s online Parent View survey, 10 questionnaires completed by members of staff and 25 questionnaires completed by pupils.
p.7
Inspection team
Sue Frater, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Rachel Miller Ofsted Inspector Adam Morris Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.8
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.8
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion