Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Vishnitz Girls School

Inspected 23 Feb 2016 · published 28 Apr 2016 · URN 138516

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Hinds

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Feb 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Mary Hinds

  • Postcode verified

    N16 5ES

  • Name on report verified

    Vishnitz Girls School

  • URN verified

    138516

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−73Very criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveindependentsafesecure
Criticismpoorconcernsconcerninglackat riskseriousnot metfailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1002w−71
  • What needs to improve373w−56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,342
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Emergency inspection school report Vishnitz Girls School

p.1

Reason for the inspection

 The Department for Education commissioned this inspection following safeguarding concerns raised about the school. The emergency inspection was unannounced.  The inspector reported against some of the regulations contained in Part 3, Welfare, health and safety of pupils; Part 5, Premises of and accommodation at schools; and Part 8, Leadership and management of the independent school standards. As a result of the inspection, further unmet standards were identified in Part 4, Suitability of staff, supply staff and proprietors.  The inspector held meetings with the headteacher for the early years provision and the headteacher for the primary phase. A number of documents were examined. These included: policies and procedures concerning safeguarding, including a scrutiny of the single central record of staff checks; health and safety documentation, including risk assessments; and the admission and attendance registers. The inspector conducted a tour of each site: the early years

p.1

Reason for the inspection

foundation stage at 196 Lordship Road; the key stage 1 accommodation at 85 Lordship Road; the key stage 2 site at Fairholt Road; and the proposed new site for all primary pupils at 49 Amhurst Park.

p.1

Main findings

 The school’s child protection policy has not been reviewed since 2010. As a result, procedures do not have regard to the Department for Education guidance, as outlined in ‘Keeping children safe in education’, July 2015 (KCSIE). Both headteachers, who are also the designated safeguarding leads, are aware of this guidance as they have recently attended child protection training. However, they are not appropriately trained, as neither has undertaken ‘Prevent’ training. Staff have not received safeguarding training as outlined in Part 1 of KCSIE and therefore are not prepared well enough to respond to the range of safeguarding concerns which may arise. This potentially puts pupils at risk of harm.  While both sets of primary accommodation are fit for purpose, the early years setting is in a poor state of repair and is untidy. Boxes and equipment are left on the floor in corridors and cables are left unsecured. This poses potential health and safety risks.

p.1

Main findings

 Supervision on all three sites has been stepped up, with security guards having responsibility for vetting visitors. However, systems for deploying staff are insufficiently robust. Practice is not consistently effective at each of the sites.  The admission register is compliant. Although the attendance registers are filled in correctly in the primary phase, those in the early years are not. Staff do not use the recommended codes. This could pose a serious safeguarding concern.  Not all the required checks are made to secure the safety of pupils. School leaders were not aware of the need to undertake prohibition checks on staff. Equally, although leaders knew about checks regarding disqualification by association, they have not undertaken these to ensure that all staff are suitable to work with children. As a result, the single central record does not include all the required checks. Furthermore, some of the safeguarding and welfare

p.1

Main findings

requirements in Section 3 of the early years statutory framework are not met. Emergency inspection: Vishnitz Girls School, 23 February 2016 2 of 6

p.1

Main findings

 The key stage 1 site does not have a suitable medical room to accommodate sick or injured pupils. Accommodation for children who feel unwell in the early years is situated in the school office, which is cramped. It does not allow for privacy, as it is not for the sole use of children. This is inadequate.  The general level of maintenance at the early years site is poor. Paint is peeling from the walls and the flooring is uneven. This is compounded by a lack of space and general untidiness.  Parents are not able to request an up-to-date child protection policy because leaders have not ensured that the policy and procedures reflect the latest statutory requirements.  The proprietor has failed to make sure that all the independent school standards are met. Their lack of scrutiny of the work of the school has not ensured that the safeguarding and welfare of pupils is promoted. The regulations concerning the quality of leadership and management are

p.2

Part 3 Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 Ensure that the school’s actions for the safeguarding and promotion of welfare of children pay due regard to the latest guidance from the Secretary of State (paragraph 7, 7(a) and 7(b)).  Ensure that health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of the written health and safety policy (paragraph 11).  Ensure that pupils are properly supervised through the appropriate deployment of school staff (paragraph 14).  Ensure that admission and attendance registers are maintained in accordance with the Education (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2006 (paragraph 15).  Ensure that the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy (paragraph 16, 16(a) and 16(b)).  Ensure that checks in relation to prohibition orders are carried out and recorded (paragraph 18(2), 18(2)(b)).

p.2

Part 3 Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 Ensure that a register is kept which shows such of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (3) and (7) as applicable to the school in question (paragraph 21(1) and 21(3)(b)).  Ensure that accommodation is provided for the medical examination of pupils (paragraph 24, 24(1)(a)).  Ensure that accommodation is provided for the short term care of sick and injured pupils, which includes a washing facility and is near to a toilet facility (paragraph 24, 24(1)(b)).  Ensure that the school premises and accommodation and facilities are maintained to a standard such that, so far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of pupils are ensured (paragraph 25).  Ensure that leaders and managers fulfil their responsibilities, so the independent school standards are met in full (paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)).  Ensure that leaders and managers actively promote the well-being of pupils, paying due regard

p.2

Part 3 Welfare, health and safety of pupils

to the latest guidance from the Secretary of State (paragraph 34(1)(c)). Emergency inspection: Vishnitz Girls School, 23 February 2016 3 of 6

p.2

Statutory requirements of the early years foundation stage

 Section 3 of the early years statutory framework – safeguarding and welfare requirements :  The school should ensure that there is a system in place to manage any potential disqualification of staff (3.14–3.18): 3.14. A registered provider or a childcare worker may be disqualified from registration . In the event of the disqualification of a registered provider, the provider must not continue as an early years provider – nor be directly concerned in the management of such provision. Where a person is disqualified, the provider must not employ that person in connection with early years provision. Where an employer becomes aware of relevant information that may lead to disqualification of an employee, the provider must take appropriate action to ensure the safety of children. 3.15. A registered provider or a childcare worker may also be disqualified because they live in the same household as another person who is disqualified, or because they live in the

p.3

Statutory requirements of the early years foundation stage

same household where a disqualified person is employed. 3.16. A provider must notify Ofsted or the agency with which the childminder is registered of any significant event which is likely to affect the suitability of any person who is in regular contact with children on the premises where childcare is provided. The disqualification of an employee could be an instance of a significant event. If a registered person or childcare worker is disqualified they may, in some circumstances, be able to obtain a ‘waiver’ from Ofsted. 3.17. The provider must give Ofsted or the childminder agency with which they are registered, the following information about themselves or about any person who lives in the same household as the registered provider or who is employed in the household: • details of any order, determination, conviction, or other ground for disqualification from registration under regulations made under section 75 of the Childcare Act 2006;

p.3

Statutory requirements of the early years foundation stage

• the date of the order, determination or conviction, or the date when the other ground for disqualification arose; • the body or court which made the order, determination or conviction, and the sentence (if any) imposed; and • a certified copy of the relevant order (in relation to an order or conviction). Emergency inspection: Vishnitz Girls School, 23 February 2016 4 of 6

p.3

Inspection team

Mary Hinds, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.4

Information about this school

 Vishnitz Girls School is a school for Orthodox Jewish girls aged between three and 10 years. All pupils are from the Orthodox Jewish community in the London Borough of Hackney in North London.  There are currently 190 pupils on roll, which breaches the school’s registration. Two pupils have an education, health and care plan. There are 73 children who attend full time in the early years provision.  The school was registered in 2009 as an early years setting and then registered as a primary school in 2012.  The school’s first full inspection was in July 2013, when all the independent school standards were judged to be met. The school’s overall effectiveness was judged to be good.  At that time the school was located in two three-storey houses, in 196 Lordship Road and 85 Fairholt Road. The school was registered to educate 80 pupils. At this time, the school applied to extend the age range to eight years of age and to increase the maximum number of pupils to

p.4

Information about this school

127.  In September 2015, the school indicated to the Department for Education that it wished to extend the age range to Year 8 and to increase the maximum number of pupils to 300.  At the time of this inspection, the school was located in three buildings. The additional site at 85 Lordship Road now accommodates Year 1 and 2 pupils.  The school intends to move all primary-aged pupils to a new site in March 2016, which is currently being renovated. The premises are spacious, with a total of nine classrooms. It is intended that the early years provision will remain at 196 Lordship Road, until the proprietor finds a new site.  The aims and ethos of the school are governed by the codes of the Torah and are based on the three tenets of Judaism, ‘Torah, Prayer and acts of loving kindness’. Emergency inspection: Vishnitz Girls School, 23 February 2016 5 of 6

p.4

School details

Unique reference number 138516 Inspection number 10010386 DfE registration number 204/6006

p.5

School details

This inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. It was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008.

p.5

School details

Type of school Orthodox Jewish day school School status Independent school Age range of pupils 3–10 years Gender of pupils Girls Number of pupils on the school roll 190 Number of part time pupils 0 Proprietor Mr Steiner Chair Rabbi Schneebalg Headteachers Mrs Weiss, Mrs Fogel, Mrs Grohman Date of previous school inspection July 2013 Annual fees (day pupils) £5,200 Telephone number 020 8800 4994 Email address head@vishnitzgirlsschool.co.uk guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.6

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.6

School details

inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit

p.6

School details

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.6

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion