Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 23 Mar 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Moss

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Mar 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Moss

  • Postcode verified

    SK13 6JH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedenthusiasmclearlyimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
862
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

David Hickey Headteacher St Margaret’s Catholic Primary School Glossop Road Glossop Derbyshire SK13 6JH

p.1

Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 23 March 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help that you gave to me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Catholic Primary School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Catholic Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with the senior leadership team and subject and other leaders, and held a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. I visited all classrooms briefly, accompanied by the headteacher, looking at pupils’ work and holding discussions with the pupils. I looked at the latest information available on pupils’ achievement. Also, I visited All Saints Catholic Primary School on the same day, which is federated with St Margaret’s and has the same governing body and which shares the same senior leadership team and other leadership roles.

p.1

Main findings

The purpose of this second visit was to check on progress in relation to the area for improvement from the last full inspection of the school to improve the leadership of the school. Also, at my previous visit, I noted that actions by you to monitor the work of the school were not happening sufficiently frequently to ensure a fast enough pace of change. I wanted to check on this occasion that you had rectified this matter.

p.2

Main findings

You have made significant progress since my last visit in aligning the leadership of St Margaret’s with its federated school, All Saints. In conjunction with the fact that the same governing body is responsible for both schools, the result has been a much more clearly unified and coherent approach to the improvement of both schools, and to the benefit of both schools. Also, the pace of change at both schools has increased accordingly.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and managers at all levels are much clearer now about their roles and responsibilities than they were at the time of my last visit. Subject and other leaders are evidently taking on their roles with greater enthusiasm and sense of purpose. They are playing a more prominent role in improving the school within their areas of responsibility. This has meant that you have been able to carry out more actions to check on the quality of teaching and learning and more frequently. As a result, improvements are being made more quickly than before.

p.2

Main findings

The broader range of actions to monitor the quality of teaching and learning has led to improvements in the performance management of the staff. You are now able to hold much more frequent discussions with the staff about their work, based on good evidence of a variety of types. Leaders and managers are much better informed in detail about things that are working well and others where that is not so. Accordingly, they are able to offer meaningful guidance to the staff and to arrange appropriate professional development opportunities.

p.2

Main findings

You have made significant changes to the organisation of classes at the school. This has enabled you to take advantage of some of the opportunities offered by being in a federation. It is helping you to make more effective and more efficient use of the staffing that you have available and to cope with some of the difficulties resulting from a smaller number of pupils now at the school.

p.2

Main findings

You have made noticeable improvements to the learning environment at St Margaret’s. Classrooms and corridors are much more attractive and conducive to learning. You have ensured much better access to the outdoor area for children in the early years provision.

p.2

Main findings

Some of the impact can be seen in the information about pupils’ achievement in 2015. Every pupil in Year 6 made at least the expected levels of progress, and all reached at least the expected level in the core subjects. The proportion of pupils achieving the required standard in phonics improved significantly. The proportion of pupils achieving a good level of development in the early years also improved. Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You have benefited from some flexibly organised and effective support from the local authority. The support has been matched well to the needs of the school and has been adapted as improvements have been made to focus more on other areas identified by you as needing further work.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Nottingham and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion