Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 335
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of complaint
On 7 March 2016, we received concerns from an outside agency about the setting's safeguarding procedures. We needed to check to make sure that the early years foundation stage safeguarding and welfare requirements were being met. In particular, the requirements that relate to safeguarding policy and practice.
p.1
Summary of complaint
We carried out an unannounced visit to the setting. We found that there had been significant delays in reporting safeguarding concerns. The provider had recognised the failings and taken action to improve the safeguarding procedures and staff knowledge. The way information is recorded and monitored had also been reviewed.
p.1
Summary of complaint
Although it was not part of the original concern, we also found that staff were not receiving regular supervision and that more able children were not being sufficiently challenged in their learning. The arrangements for nappy changing did not respect children's privacy and there was ineffective risk assessment of accidents.
p.1
Summary of complaint
As a result, we issued the provider a notice to improve, which asks them to:
p.1
Summary of complaint
-implement regular supervision for staff, to provide opportunities to discuss any issues relating to children's development or well-being; identify solutions to address issues as they arise; and to provide coaching and support to improve their personal effectiveness,
p.1
Summary of complaint
-improve the arrangements for children's personal care, ensuring their privacy is respected at all times,
p.1
Summary of complaint
-review the arrangements for risk assessing accidents that may occur in the setting, so that hazards are monitored and addressed, and to
p.1
Summary of complaint
-ensure that the educational programme meets the needs of all children, including providing sufficient challenge for the children that are most able.
p.2
Summary of complaint
The provider responded appropriately to the actions raised and remains registered with Ofsted.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet (Reference no. 080120)
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion