Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Brymore School

Inspected 15 Mar 2016 · published 22 Apr 2016 · URN 123903

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sharron Escott (lead), Michelle Oxley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date AI-checked

    15 Mar 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michelle Oxley, Sharron Escott

  • Postcode verified

    TA5 2NB

  • Name on report verified

    Brymore Academy

  • URN verified

    123903

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−72Very criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveconsistently
Criticisminadequateconcernslackunsafefailedweaknessesweaknessat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
650
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Cannington, Bridgwater, Somerset TA5 2NB

p.1

Inspection dates 15 March 2016 to 24 March 2016

p.1

The overall experiences and progress of children and young people Inadequate 4

p.1

The quality of care and support Inadequate 4 How well children and young people are protected Inadequate 4 The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Inadequate 4

p.1

Summary of key findings

The boarding provision is inadequate because

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Senior leaders, managers and governors have failed to effectively manage safeguarding concerns. Weaknesses are evident in the overall management, decision-making, oversight and record-keeping of child protection matters.  The records of child protection concerns are not well maintained. Safeguarding referrals to the local authority designated officer lack critical information. Safeguarding records retained by the school do not identify the actions staff take and investigations completed, or describe the information shared with supporting agencies.  Boarders who have complex needs and are vulnerable are not provided with adequate adult care or the supervision that they need. There is an over-reliance on older boarders, who have responsibilities as student mentors to supervise much younger boarders.  Leaders and managers do not assess the risks of boarders sharing dormitories together. In addition, care plans and risk assessments lack critical information

p.1

Summary of key findings

about boarders’ needs, risks and behaviours. Cultural and religious needs are not given sufficient consideration.  Boarding staff are not provided with adequate training and formal supervision to meet the complex needs of boarders.  Matrons have not received sufficient training in the management of medication. The dispensing, administration and recording of medication is unsafe. This Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 2 of 12 weakness in practice has the potential to place boarders at risk of harm.  A number of national minimum standards are not met. Records are not well maintained or rigorously monitored by senior managers.

p.1

Summary of key findings

Compliance with the national minimum standards for boarding schools The school does not meet the national minimum standards for boarding schools.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 3.4: Ensure all medication is safely and securely stored and proper records are kept of its administration. Prescribed medicines are given only to the boarders to whom they are prescribed. Boarders allowed to self-medicate are assessed as sufficiently responsible to do so.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 5.1: Ensure suitable sleeping accommodation is provided for boarders. Ensure it is well organised and managed with risk assessments undertaken and findings acted upon to reduce risk for all boarders.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 6.3: Ensure that the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy and that appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 10.3: Ensure that where there are unusual or especially onerous demands on boarders, that these are appropriate to the boarders concerned and do not affect their welfare.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 11.1: Ensure that: ― arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and ― such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.  13.1: Ensure that the school's governing body and/or proprietor monitors the effectiveness of the leadership, management and delivery of the boarding and welfare provision in the school, and takes appropriate action where necessary.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 13.4: Ensure that the school's leadership and management consistently fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the standards are met.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 13.8: Ensure that the records specified in Appendix 2 are maintained and monitored by the school and action taken as appropriate.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 13.9: Ensure that the issues specified in Appendix 3 are monitored, and action is taken to improve outcomes for children as appropriate.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 15.1: Ensure that any staff member or volunteer employed or volunteering in a position working with boarders has a job description reflecting their duties, receives induction training in boarding when newly appointed, and receives regular reviews of their boarding practice, with opportunities for training and Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 3 of 12 continual professional development in boarding.

p.2

Summary of key findings

 18.1: Ensure that the school has, and follows, an appropriate policy on recording and responding to complaints that is compliant with the relevant regulatory standards. Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 4 of 12

p.3

Information about this inspection

The school was notified of the inspection on the morning of 15 March 2016. Inspectors arrived at 11.20am. The inspectors visited the residential provision, observed staff and boarders’ interaction and met with boarders and with the residential staff. In addition, the inspectors scrutinised a variety of records, documents and policies and procedures.

p.4

Information about this inspection

The inspectors were aware during this inspection that serious allegations of a child protection nature were being investigated by external authorities. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate allegations of this kind, actions taken by senior staff in response to the allegation were considered (where appropriate), alongside the other evidence available at the time of the inspection, to inform the judgement reached

p.4

Inspection team

Michelle Oxley lead social care inspector

p.4

Inspection team

regulatory inspection manager Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 5 of 12

p.4

Information about this school

Brymore School of Rural Technology is a single-sex school for boys which was established in 1952. The school is a maintained state boarding school. Education is free and there is a modest charge for boarding provision. The school offers an opportunity for boys from 11 to 17 years of age to develop their knowledge of farming, horticulture, engineering and sports. The school has a capacity for 150 boarders. At the time of this inspection, there were 131 boarders. The school is broadly Christian, with an ethos based on resilience, responsibility and resourcefulness. Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 6 of 12

p.5

Inspection judgements

The overall experiences and progress of children and young people Inadequate

p.6

Inspection judgements

In 2015, the school extended its boarding provision to include Year 7 and Year 8 pupils, some of whom have complex needs. Leaders and managers have not ensured that there are sufficient adults to care for these younger and vulnerable boarders. Historically, leaders and managers have used older boarders to take responsibility, as student mentors, for other boarders. This arrangement has continued without being reviewed or adjusted to take account of the increase in younger boarders and those who have complex needs. As a result, the behaviour and well-being of younger boarders continue to be predominately managed and closely monitored by older boarders. As a consequence, boarders with complex care needs, including needs arising from mental ill health, autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, do not receive the required level of adult care, attention or supervision. This arrangement is risky and places too

p.6

Inspection judgements

much responsibility on student mentors. Senior leaders have failed to ensure that staff receive sufficient training to support the boarders’ needs. Staff have not received training in autistic spectrum disorders, mental ill health, self-harm, sexual health or sexually harmful behaviours. As a result, staff are not equipped with the necessary technical knowledge and skills to enable them to provide the best possible care. New boarders receive sufficient information and opportunities to visit the boarding house prior to boarding at the school. Boarding staff work in partnership with parents to help boarders settle and to reduce any home sickness. Boarders are able to maintain good contact with family and friends using a variety of methods, including by telephone, email, Facetime and Skype. Boarders have good opportunities to develop their health and well-being through a good range of physical activities. Boarders are motivated and keep themselves fit. Boarders

p.6

Inspection judgements

told the inspectors that the boarding experience helps them to develop their confidence, skills and independence. Boarders have very good opportunities to develop skills for work. They gain practical experience of farming and have opportunities to work in the school’s own forge. During the inspection, boarders showed inspectors the excellent range of projects they had been working on in design technology lessons and after school. Staff have high aspirations for pupils. All boarders spoken with could identify their career ambitions and knew how they would achieve them. The boarding houses are well maintained, personalised and well resourced. Boarders are able to individualise their sleeping area and are encouraged to express their views and share any ideas that they may have to enhance the boarding provision.

p.6

Inspection judgements

The quality of care and support Inadequate Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 7 of 12 Formal assessments have not been completed to determine the sleeping arrangements of boarders. Staff have not assessed the impact of a boarder’s needs and behaviours, and the risk that one boarder may pose to another. Senior leaders have developed boarding care and support plans for some boarders with complex care needs. However, these plans do not include significant information about some boarders’ care requirements. A range of information is omitted from a number of plans, including how to deal with pupils’ emerging sexuality, self-harming behaviours, autistic spectrum needs, and religious and cultural needs. As a result, there is a lack of strategic planning for boarders’ complex care needs and some boarders at risk and who are vulnerable, are not having their needs met. In addition, not all boarders are afforded

p.6

Inspection judgements

sufficient privacy because their personal targets are displayed in the shared dormitories. Boarders are supported to respect others and develop tolerance through living together in a group. Student mentors appropriately challenge the views and behaviour of boarders when conflict arise, including challenging bullying and racism. They are good role models. However, the level of responsibility they have for overseeing the care of younger boarders is onerous Boarders spoken to say that they are proud of their achievements and rate their boarding experience as good. They can identify someone to speak to if they are worried or concerned. Good use is made by pupils of the ‘whisper’ reporting system to alert staff to worries or concerns. Bullying is not a problem at the school. Boarders say that they look out for each other. They are confident that their personal items are safe. In the main, the boarders presented as happy and confident young people.

p.7

Inspection judgements

Boarders’ dining experiences have improved since the previous inspection. The dining hall has been relocated and is now spacious, light and airy. The quality and quantity of food at mealtimes have improved significantly. Boarders enjoy wholesome and nutritious food and their dietary needs are known by staff and catered for well. Most boarders are positive about the quality of food provided and say that they can help themselves to a second portion. Boarders can access a range of snacks and drinks in between meals.

p.7

Inspection judgements

How well children and young people are protected Inadequate

p.7

Inspection judgements

Records maintained by senior leaders relating to safeguarding and child protection are inadequate. Critical information is missing; actions taken by leaders are not comprehensively evidenced and crucial information has, on occasions, been omitted from referrals made to the external agencies responsible for safeguarding children. As a result, boarders are at risk of not receiving the support, protection and services they may need. New systems for boarders to report any concerns, complaints and safeguarding matters have been implemented and these are frequently used. Senior leaders meet daily to review concerns and behavioural incidents. Collectively, they agree on the actions to take and, on occasion, consult external agencies and parents. The recording of these meetings is weak. There is no audit trail of decision-making, therefore, senior leaders cannot always evidence that suitable action was taken to

p.7

Inspection judgements

Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 8 of 12 ensure the safety and welfare of boarders.

p.8

Inspection judgements

The management and monitoring of medication is unsafe. Matrons who dispense and administer medication have not received suitable training. As a result, medication is incorrectly handled and sterile containers for dispensing medication are not used. There is an increased risk of medication being contaminated. In addition, matrons do not record the amount of prescription medication coming into or leaving the school. As a result, medication stock balances are unknown. The processes for assessing and managing risks to boarders are inadequate. Leaders and managers fail to identify and record high-risk factors relating to the risk of sexual exploitation, self-harming behaviours and gang crime. Strategies to mitigate these risks are insufficient and as a result, boarders are vulnerable. Boarders report that they feel safe, both in the boarding houses and school. The behaviour management system is used effectively by staff when incidents significantly

p.8

Inspection judgements

impact on boarders’ progress or safety. Boarders benefit from the help staff give them to develop their understanding of bullying, discriminatory behaviours and radicalisation. This work is linked to the ‘Prevent’ strategy. E-safety is well managed and safeguarding filters are used when boarders access the school’s wi-fi. Good work is undertaken with boarders to develop their understanding and the skills to keep themselves safe online. Boarders, staff and visitors are kept safe by the staff team’s good management of health and safety. Fire evacuation procedures are known and understood by boarders through regular practice at varying times of the day. Robust monitoring of equipment, and checks of the grounds and accommodation ensure that boarders are in a safe environment. Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 9 of 12 The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Inadequate Senior leaders and managers have failed to adequately manage the increase in the

p.8

Inspection judgements

number of boarders who are younger and have more complex needs. The staffing ratio to care for these boarders is too low. There is an over-reliance on student mentors to manage younger boarders and take responsibility for their welfare concerns and complex health needs. Governors, senior leaders and managers have failed to monitor rigorously the quality of the records maintained by the school. As a result, they have failed to identify a number of shortfalls and discrepancies in the records relating to safeguarding and complaints. Governors regularly visit the boarding provision, spend time with boarders and staff, and review emerging patterns and trends of behaviours. Senior leaders are visible and accessible to boarders and boarding staff. Senior leaders have failed to ensure that staff have the required training and knowledge, to look after and manage the increased number of younger boarders and those with more

p.9

Inspection judgements

complex needs. In addition, boarding staff, are not provided with formal supervision. As a result, opportunities to review and reflect upon their practice are missed. A suitable complaints procedure is in place. However, the senior leaders do not always follow it. In some cases, the records of complaint investigations lack detail of the action staff take in response to the complaint. As a result, leaders’ ability to oversee the complaints effectively, to establish that a satisfactory resolution has been reached and that boarders are fully protected, is limited. The aims and objectives of the school’s boarding principles, what facilities it provides and its practices are clearly defined in information available to parents and staff. Since the previous inspection, a new director of boarding has been appointed. She has consolidated the communication systems and improved the links between the boarding staff and senior

p.9

Inspection judgements

leadership team. A pastoral manager has been appointed and is due to start working at the school in April 2016. Leaders have made this appointment in recognition of the need to strengthen the management arrangements for the increased number of boarders.

p.9

What inspection judgements mean

The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against ‘Inspections of boarding and residential provision in schools: the inspection framework’. Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 10 of 12 Judgement Description

p.9

What inspection judgements mean

Outstanding A school where the experiences and progress of children and young people consistently exceeds the standard of good and results in sustained progress and achievement. The outcomes achieved by children and young people are outstanding and the impact the boarding/residential provision has had in supporting this progress and achieving these outcomes is clearly evidenced.

p.10

What inspection judgements mean

Good A school providing effective services which exceed minimum requirements. Children and young people are protected and cared for and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted.

p.10

What inspection judgements mean

Requires improvement A school where there are no serious or widespread failures that result in children and young people's welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. However, the overall outcomes, experiences and progress of children and young people are not yet good.

p.10

What inspection judgements mean

Inadequate A school where there are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded or if their care and experiences are poor and they are not making progress. Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 11 of 12

p.10

School details

Social care unique reference number SC042165

p.11

School details

This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989, as amended by the Care Standards Act 2000, having regard to the national minimum standards for boarding schools.

p.11

School details

Date of previous boarding inspection 22 November 2012

p.11

School details

Email address MThomas4@educ.somerset.gov.uk Inspection Report Brymore Academy, 24 March 2016 Page 12 of 12 guidance 'Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.11

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when as part of the inspection.

p.12

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. if you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.12

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.

p.12

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.co.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion