Summary
Stephen Lee (lead), Deborah Wring, Mary Massey, Paul Winterton, Roger Garrett, William Morgan
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Deborah Wring, Mary Massey, Paul Winterton, Roger Garrett, Stephen Lee, William Morgan
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SN3 1ER
- Name on report verified
Churchfields Academy
- URN verified
137408
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Many girls display very positive attitudes to learning and are making good progress, particularly those who are most able. p.1
- This makes a positive contribution to their personal development, behaviour and welfare by successfully meeting their needs as learners. p.5
- A key role in this successful drive has been played by the effective use of the Churchfields Inclusion Centre. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement p.1
- Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement p.1
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement p.1
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good p.1
- Pupils do not make consistently strong progress across year groups and subjects. p.1
- As a result they do not develop sufficiently secure knowledge, understanding and skills. p.1
- In particular boys make slower progress than girls over time, whatever their starting points. p.1
- The progress of disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs or disability is inconsistent across the school, partly as a result of ineffective planning to meet their needs. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,890
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Churchfields Academy Salcombe Grove, Swindon SN3 1ER
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
Pupils do not make consistently strong progress across year groups and subjects. As a result they do not develop sufficiently secure knowledge, understanding and skills. In particular boys make slower progress than girls over time, whatever their starting points. The progress of disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs or disability is inconsistent across the school, partly as a result of ineffective planning to meet their needs. Some pupils do not display sufficient awareness of how to be successful learners or possess the skills to do so. This is particularly true of some boys, notably those from White British backgrounds. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment has not been strong enough to ensure that pupils make consistent progress. The level of challenge in lessons is often insufficient or inappropriate. Monitoring of teaching does not put sufficient emphasis on assessing pupils’ progress.
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement
School leaders do not yet have a comprehensive and accurate picture of pupils’ attainment and achievement across all year groups. The school’s marking and feedback policy is not used consistently by teachers. This limits its impact on improving pupils’ progress. Governors do not provide the school’s leaders with effective levels of support or challenge.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The newly formed leadership team are beginning to demonstrate a capacity to improve the school. They have made a number of important changes to the school’s work but many of these have yet to reveal their full impact. The school’s work to improve attendance has been successful. The number of fixed-term exclusions has declined markedly. The school is working hard to keep children with behavioural problems in school. Attainment and progress in English for the current Year 11 show clear improvement. Some of the gaps between the performance of disadvantaged pupils and others are beginning to close. Those pupils whose first language is not English make good progress. Many girls display very positive attitudes to learning and are making good progress, particularly those who are most able.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so that it is consistently good by ensuring that teachers:
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
plan teaching which takes sufficient account of the needs of disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs so that they make more consistent progress encourage pupils to work with positive attitudes so that they apply themselves well and make better progress set tasks that are challenging and inspiring enough to promote better progress, especially for boys.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by ensuring that:
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
recent initiatives are consistently implemented across the school and that their impact is accurately monitored accurate evaluation of assessment information is used more effectively to inform strategic planning the monitoring of the effectiveness of teaching, learning and assessment focuses more closely on the progress pupils make over time governors provide a thorough level of challenge and support to the school’s leadership teachers improve the consistency and effectiveness with which they use the school’s marking and feedback policy to help pupils make better progress.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders and managers do not have an accurate and comprehensive understanding of the quality of education provided by the school. This is particularly the case in relation to the progress that pupils make and the quality of teaching they receive. Historically, school leaders have had an over-inflated view of the quality of teaching, largely as a result of poor monitoring procedures. They now recognise this and are taking steps to improve the way teachers’ performance is assessed. Records of school leaders’ current monitoring of teaching through observations in lessons, however, show that they are still placing insufficient emphasis on the progress that pupils make. Nonetheless, the new policy is a step in the right direction. Leaders’ understanding of the progress that pupils make across all year groups and subjects is too inconsistent and, at times, unconvincing. For example, their understanding of the progress of pupils
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
currently in Year 11 is good but this is not the case in other year groups. In particular, the school’s information on how pupils are progressing in key stage 3 is not robust enough and appears to show wide fluctuations in the performance of pupils in years 7 and 8 across different subjects. The school’s leadership has undergone some major changes in recent months. The acting principal has been in post since November 2015 (having stepped up from being vice-principal) and two new assistant principals joined the school in September 2015. As a team they are beginning to get to grips with some of the key issues that the school needs to act upon but as yet many of their initiatives have had too little time to show any significant impact or, like the new strategy for monitoring teaching, require further refinement. School leaders do not yet evaluate well enough the use of either the pupil premium, the extra funding
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
provided by the government for disadvantaged pupils, or Year 7 catch-up funding for pupils who enter the school with low levels of literacy and numeracy. Leaders do not have sufficient insight into what impact these funds are having on the progress pupils make. Staff have received some training on how to teach disadvantaged pupils effectively but this has yet to have a significant impact on practice in the classroom. Middle leaders, especially those who are in charge of subjects, are beginning to work well together in building links between subjects across the curriculum. For example, the literacy policy for science provides more opportunities for pupils to write and is beginning to improve pupils’ extended writing. The curriculum has undergone some reorganisation in the light of recent national changes. More time is provided for core subjects such as English and mathematics and pupils in key stage 4 study one less
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
GCSE course. Three pathways have been designed and introduced to support pupils based on their ability, but the lack of accuracy in the attainment and progress data for pupils in years 7 and 8 means that some doubts must remain as to whether all pupils are on the most appropriate pathways. The personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum meets the needs of most pupils and makes a good, if uneven, contribution to their social, moral, spiritual and cultural development (SMSC). Good use is made of external speakers and links with the local police and community support officer are strong. The school’s own SMSC audit, however, recognises a weakness in the spiritual and cultural provision for pupils in years 9, 10 and 11. It is due to the patchiness in provision that pupils’ social, moral, cultural and spiritual development requires improvement. There are some extra-curricular activities, mostly sporting, but the school does not monitor these closely
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
enough for a judgement to be made on the degree to which they contribute to the pupils’ personal, social, moral, spiritual or cultural development. The school’s marking and feedback policy is followed by most teachers but with varying degrees of effectiveness. In some cases teachers are using it to help pupils make good progress. In other cases, however, teachers are not using the opportunities afforded by the policy in order to help pupils improve their work. Leaders’ work to promote fundamental British values is at an early stage of development. As a consequence, while pupils are very clear about the school’s own core values, they lack explicit knowledge of how these relate to fundamental British values. Staff have been trained on the dangers of radicalisation and extremism but work with pupils to raise their awareness of such dangers is still at an early stage of development. The governance of the school
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Over time governors have not been able to supply the levels of challenge and support that the school leaders have required during a period when outcomes for pupils were falling dramatically. No one can doubt the commitment of many long-serving governors to the school but they currently lack the capacity to be a significant positive influence on improving the quality of education. They do not possess the depth of understanding of the school’s work necessary to enable them to carry out their work effectively. For example, governors show no detailed knowledge of the impact of the school’s use of the pupil premium or of Year 7 catch-up funding. To their credit, governors recognise the shortcomings of the governing body as currently constituted. Recently they have voluntarily undertaken an external review of governance but this is incomplete and so far they have not been able to implement any significant improvements as a consequence.
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
The governors have decided to enter into a multi-academy trust with Royal Wootton Bassett Academy. This is a nearby school that Churchfields is already working with and that has a successful record of helping other schools to improve. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The school places a high degree of importance on safeguarding. Recent changes have introduced a greater tenacity in the way the school challenges the external agencies it works with. The designated safeguarding lead has brought better organisation to the school’s child protection records. All staff receive appropriate safeguarding training and the school makes all the required checks on their backgrounds. Most pupils reported feeling safe and this view was echoed by a large majority of parents who responded to the online survey of parental opinion.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment that pupils experience in their time at the school is inconsistent and as a consequence it requires improvement. Teachers’ planning is often focused on the completion of tasks rather than the progress of pupils from their individual starting points. Moving swiftly through tasks is too readily equated with higher ability. As a result, teachers tend to tag extension work on to the end of tasks that all pupils undertake rather than thinking more imaginatively about whether or not all pupils need to do the same tasks to start with. Some teachers are using information about what pupils can and cannot do to help them plan lessons but this is not a consistent feature of teaching across the school and consequently pupils’ progress suffers. Good examples of how to use assessment information to help pupils make progress do exist, for example in mathematics, and the school could usefully learn and build on this good practice across all
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
departments. The degree of challenge presented to pupils varies too much across subjects and year groups, particularly for the most-able pupils. As a result pupils’ levels of engagement can be variable. When they are given stretching tasks to do, many rise gladly to the challenge, particularly the more-able girls. Some pupils, notably boys, switch off or drift in the face of uninspiring teaching. As a result, teaching does not consistently develop positive attitudes among pupils. Questioning as a tool to probe, assess and develop pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills is used inconsistently in the school. When done effectively it challenges pupils to think and tackles misconceptions, but too often it is cursory or perfunctory. Teachers do not always make best use of the information provided by the school about pupils with special educational needs or disability. Similarly, many do not take sufficient account of the needs of
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
disadvantaged pupils, despite the recent training they have received on this. Examples of good planning and delivery of teaching for these key groups do exist and leaders are beginning to think more strategically about how to promote this. For example, the school has revised the way it deploys teaching assistants to work with groups of pupils. However, this is a very recent innovation which has not had the time to demonstrate any impact. In the online survey, Parent View, parents mostly agreed that the school sets appropriate homework and the vast majority are pleased with the information the school provides about their children’s progress.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils do not generally display a thirst for knowledge or a passion for education. They are often content to sit back when they have completed the work set rather than actively seeking out new challenges. These attitudes improve somewhat in Year 11 and many pupils in this year group were keen to join recent Saturday morning booster sessions in mathematics. Observations in lessons and scrutiny of work reveal that many boys, especially those from White British backgrounds, have not yet developed the habits associated with successful learners. Girls, however, often show they have the awareness of how to learn effectively and the self-motivation to do so. The school is working to develop pupils’ understanding of what it means to be a successful learner. For example, the school is currently having a drive to improve the frequency with which pupils bring the
p.5
Personal development and welfare
correct equipment to school. Despite this some pupils are still not arriving prepared for work. They are failing, for example, to bring the calculators supplied by the school to every mathematics lesson. Pupils report that some bullying does take place but they know who to go to when it happens. They are reasonably confident that the school deals with bullying well. Pupils speak very positively about the work done by the staff in the Grove Learning Centre, which helps pupils with social, emotional and behavioural needs. This enables them to develop as individuals and to deal with any problems they might have. A small number of pupils attend a childcare course at nearby New College. This makes a positive contribution to their personal development, behaviour and welfare by successfully meeting their needs as learners.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Some pupils reported that there were occasions when their learning was interrupted by the behaviour of their fellow pupils. Inspectors saw some evidence of this, mainly from boys, in the form, for example, of talking over the teachers’ instructions. While such behaviour could not be regarded as prevalent it was of sufficient concern to those pupils who wish to get on with their learning for them to mention it in discussions with inspectors. Pupils’ levels of self-discipline are variable. Some work well in classes but others lose concentration, especially when the teaching does not engage, challenge or inspire them. Pupils conduct themselves well around the school’s site. They are polite and courteous to adults and helpful to visitors. Attendance is improving due to the increasingly effective work of school leaders in targeting resources at key groups and individuals in order to reduce their absence. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils is
p.5
Behaviour
improving faster than the overall rate, although there is still some work to do with disadvantaged pupils who are persistently absent. The school has worked hard to reduce the number of fixed-term exclusions. A key role in this successful drive has been played by the effective use of the Churchfields Inclusion Centre. This means that pupils who previously might have been at risk of exclusion are kept in education.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
The progress that pupils make in all year groups and across subjects is too inconsistent and, as a consequence, requires improvement. This is closely linked to the variable quality of teaching, learning and assessment that pupils experience in their time at the school. In contrast to the poor performance of pupils in the past, current information on pupils’ outcomes indicates clear signs that things are now improving, although there is still some way to go before they could be regarded as anywhere near good. For example, the attainment and progress of pupils currently in Year 11 is close to that expected of pupils nationally. Rates of progress in mathematics in Year 11 are also improving but they are still some way short of the national figure. The achievement of disadvantaged pupils is improving and the gaps between their progress and that of other pupils are narrowing, as is the case for pupils who have special educational needs or disability.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
However, the improvement here is less marked and gaps remain for both these groups of pupils. Pupils’ progress across a range of subjects is variable, especially in key stage 3. Moreover, the school does not have an accurate enough understanding of the progress that is actually being made in this key stage and this is, in itself, an obstacle to further improvement. The progress of girls has been a significant strength of the school over recent years and continues to be so. By contrast, boys’ achievement has declined in recent years. Current information, however, shows that boys’ progress is improving but that there is still a wide gap between the progress made by boys and girls. This was clearly evident to inspectors in lessons and in pupils’ work. Pupils, and particularly girls, who speak English as an additional language make very good progress. Pupils do not yet read widely and often. The school has a wonderfully maintained library but it is used at
p.5
Outcomes for pupils require improvement
lunchtimes more like a common room than a place to read or work in. The school does not monitor closely enough the extent to which pupils read but it does have information to show that the pupil premium has been used to speed up the development of disadvantaged pupils’ reading ages. Pupils who attend childcare courses at nearby New College make good progress.
p.6
School details
Unique reference number 137408 Local authority Swindon Inspection number 10017580 This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.7
School details
Type of school Secondary comprehensive School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 779 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Keith Saunders Acting Principal Sandra Muir Telephone number 01793 487286 Website www.churchfields.swindon.sch.uk Email address administrator@churchfields.org Date of previous inspection 21–22 February 2013
p.7
Information about this school
Churchfields Academy is a secondary school of smaller than average size. It converted to be an academy in August 2011. It has higher than average proportions of pupils who are eligible for free school meals or who have special educational needs or disability. It has much higher than average proportions of pupils from minority ethnic groups or who speak English as an additional language. The academy has been receiving support from Royal Wootton Bassett Academy, which is a teaching school. It is in the process of forming a multi-academy trust with that school. The school uses one alternative provider, New College in Swindon. The school currently does not meet the government’s floor standards for GCSE results, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning across all year groups and in a wide range of subjects. A large number of these observations were undertaken jointly with members of the school’s senior leadership team. During the time spent in lessons the opportunity was taken to scrutinise pupils’ work. Inspectors had discussions with the acting principal, senior and middle leaders and other members of staff. The lead inspector met with the chair and vice-chair of the governing body and one other governor. He also spoke to the school’s improvement partner. Inspectors had discussions with pupils from all year groups and with members of the student council. A wide range of documentary evidence was scrutinised, including the school’s own self-evaluation, the school improvement plan, minutes of governors’ meetings, records of observations of teaching, of pupils’ work and information about their progress. Documents relating to safeguarding and child protection
p.8
Information about this inspection
were also checked, as were the school’s records of the checks it makes on teachers. In making their judgements inspectors took into account 24 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online parental questionnaire. There were no responses to the online staff or pupil questionnaires.
p.8
Inspection team
Stephen Lee, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Deborah Wring Ofsted Inspector Roger Garrett Ofsted Inspector Mary Massey Ofsted Inspector William Morgan Ofsted Inspector Paul Winterton Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.9
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.9
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion