Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 2
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −47Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Praisedisruptive
    Criticismconcernsnot effectively

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No strong criticism found.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    2
    Words of findings
    248
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Fairly hard
    Flesch 51, typical 45
    Average sentence
    19 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    0%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Summary of complaint

    On 17 March 2016, we received a complaint raising concerns about a child left with an unvetted adult whilst the childminder went out. We visited the provider and looked into this information to see whether the setting was meeting Child protection and Suitable people. The childminder admitted that they had left a child with an unvetted adult whilst they attended an appointment. The childminder stated that the child was familiar with the adult and felt it was less disruptive to the child. However, the person had not been vetted or obtained Disclosure and Barring Service checks. The person did not have a paediatric first aid certificate and it would also have invalidated any childminder insurance. This meant that children are not effectively safeguarded. Following our visit we asked the provider to: ensure that they did not allow people whose suitability has not been checked, including through a criminal records check, to have unsupervised contact with

    p.1

    Summary of complaint

    children being cared for The provider confirmed in writing that childminded children would not be left in the care of unvetted adults. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.

    p.1

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.

    p.1

    Publication of complaints

    We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation. For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet (Reference no. 080120)

    p.1

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion