Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder EY477554
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Susan Sykes
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY477554
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The required progress check for children between the ages of two and three years has not been carried out. p.1
- Consequently, parents have not been fully informed of their children's development. p.1
- The childminder does not ask parents for sufficient information about their children's abilities and stages of learning when they first start at her setting, or as they continue to attend. p.1
- Children's developmental progress is not tracked effectively to ensure that any gaps are quickly identified and managed. p.1
- Children are not helped to gain an understanding of different cultural events and the wider world. p.1
- The childminder's self-evaluation is not accurate in identifying weaknesses in her practice. p.1
- As a result, improvements to practice are not robustly applied. p.1
- Children play happily and are confident in the care of the childminder. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes8
“Children are not yet making good progress.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health3
“She knows how to report concerns in order to protect children's physical and emotional well-being.” p.3Communication & language2
“The childminder promotes children's speech and communication skills.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 802
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 31 March 2016 Not applicable
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The required progress check for children between the ages of two and three years has not been carried out. Consequently, parents have not been fully informed of their children's development. The childminder does not ask parents for sufficient information about their children's abilities and stages of learning when they first start at her setting, or as they continue to attend. Children's developmental progress is not tracked effectively to ensure that any gaps are quickly identified and managed. Children are not helped to gain an understanding of different cultural events and the wider world. The childminder's self-evaluation is not accurate in identifying weaknesses in her practice. As a result, improvements to practice are not robustly applied.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children play happily and are confident in the care of the childminder. The childminder offers them attention and praise, helping them to feel valued and supporting their emotional well-being. Children benefit from learning about healthy lifestyles. The childminder actively promotes children's physical health and well-being through daily outdoor activities and promoting healthy eating. The childminder promotes children's speech and communication skills. This supports them to be confident communicators.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
complete the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years, ensuring that parents are provided with a written summary of their child's progress in the prime areas of learning and development 25/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
gather more detailed information from parents about children's learning and development at home, to provide a more accurate understanding of their initial abilities and ongoing progress 25/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
establish effective systems for monitoring children's developmental progress so that any gaps can be swiftly identified and addressed. 25/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
explore further ways for children to gain an understanding of different cultural events and the wider world sharpen the self-evaluation process to identify the weaknesses in practice and address these to drive rapid improvement including recognised professional development needs.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector viewed the areas used for childminding. She talked to the children and childminder at appropriate times throughout the inspection and observed a variety of activities. The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability and qualifications of the childminder as well as a selection of policies and procedures, including safeguarding. She discussed risk assessments and the childminder's self-evaluation process. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder. She discussed children's learning and development and sampled their records and looked at the planning documentation. The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day and by reading a number of their comments on letters obtained by the childminder.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Safeguarding arrangements are effective. The childminder is aware of the signs and symptoms of abuse. She knows how to report concerns in order to protect children's physical and emotional well-being. However, in other areas, she does not keep up to date with legislation and good practice guidance to support her continuous improvement. For example, she is not fully aware of promoting the prime and specific areas of learning, in order to support good quality learning experiences for children. Despite this, she does provide children with a varied range of activities that they enjoy. Overall, the childminder's self-evaluation does not clearly identify the strengths or weaknesses of her practice. This means improvement to her practice is not rapid.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder observes children's learning and development and uses these observations to plan children's broad next steps. However, these are not used effectively to ensure that she knows precisely where children are in their learning or to identify any gaps to support their continuing progress. The limited information she seeks from parents does not give sufficient overview of what children know and can do in order to inform more-effective planning. The childminder engages in children's play, and during these interactions the quality of teaching is purposeful. For example, children sit with the childminder to look at books together. She reads stories to children who excitedly join in and pre-empt what will happen next. This helps to support children's literacy, communication and language skills. Children's mathematical and problem-solving skills are supported as they independently build trees using building blocks of different sizes and
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Children quickly settle into the childminding setting. They enjoy the childminder's praise and readily go to her for cuddles and reassurance. This effectively supports children as they develop the confidence to manage new experiences. Children are helped to understand and manage their feelings and behaviour. However, there are fewer opportunities for children to gain more awareness of the wider world and cultures other than their own. The childminder is a good role model as she calmly supports children as they learn right from wrong. Their health needs are met and their self-care skills are promoted, for example, as younger children independently wash their hands before snacks. Children have opportunities to be active and the childminder encourages activities outdoors where children benefit from fresh air and exercise. Written testimonials from parents indicate the high regard they have for the childminder.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children are not yet making good progress. They are gaining some of the key skills needed for their next stage of learning. Children become confident and independent as the childminder values their ideas and follows their interests. However, assessments do not accurately track children's progress or identify any gaps in learning swiftly so that the childminder is fully aware of any extra support children may need.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY477554 Local authority Peterborough Inspection number 974119 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 3 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2014 and lives in Peterborough, Cambridgeshire. She operates all year round from 8.30am to 8.30pm, Monday to Friday, including bank holidays. The childminder takes time off for family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion