Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Wood Ley Community Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
11 Feb 2016
- Inspectorssingle source
Heather Yaxley
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
IP14 1UF
- Name on report verified
Wood Ley Community Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff are confident to try new things and feel well supported. p.1
- This aspect of the school’s work has improved, particularly under your leadership, so that staff understand and use the system for tracking pupils’ assessments effectively. p.2
- Given the ambition of staff and the governing body, it is no surprise that pupils are confident learners and that parents are equally confident in the leadership of the school. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,256
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 56, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Sandra Renwick Headteacher Wood Ley Community Primary School Lowry Way Stowmarket Suffolk IP14 1UF
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 11 February 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2011.
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection. A period of significant change has been managed well by the leadership team and the governing body, past and present. It is testament to everyone’s hard work and the leadership qualities of senior staff that the transition to a primary school has gone well.
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
When the previous headteacher left, at the end of the last academic year, the school was in good shape. Nevertheless, you knew that there were things that needed to improve further and you have successfully stamped your own style on school development. Staff have wholeheartedly embraced your ambitions and made them their own. Staff morale is high and you and the new deputy headteacher have successfully taken staff to a higher level of performance, particularly for assessment and the curriculum.
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
You are known for your attention to detail and for being well organised. Staff at all levels of responsibility like this. They know where they stand and respect you for finding out what it is like for them in their work. Staff particularly welcome the way that you involve them fully in making decisions.
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
You make sure that staff are outward-looking. Training and reflection are key to the way that the senior leadership team works with staff. Traditional ways of working are challenged and new ways are adopted in pursuit of good practice. For example, additional support for pupils who need to catch up is tailored to their individual needs and circumstances. Staff are confident to try new things and feel well supported.
p.1
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
At the time of the previous inspection, the leadership team was asked to improve teachers’ use of assessment to plan pupils’ learning. This aspect of the school’s work has improved, particularly under your leadership, so that staff understand and use the system for tracking pupils’ assessments effectively. Reviews of pupils’ performance in each class are now routine and frequent features of teachers’ work.
p.2
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
Extending leaders’ roles and responsibilities was highlighted for improvement in the previous inspection report. Since your appointments, you and the deputy headteacher have developed the roles of subject leaders and the special needs coordinator. Although it is still early days for them to play a full part in school development, subject leaders already have a firm grasp of their subjects and the special needs coordinator has a clear understanding of what works best.
p.2
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
It is not only the staff that have changed their practice; so too has the governing body. In the autumn term of 2015, the governing body found itself in need of several new members. In the same way that you and the staff embraced the opportunity for change, the governing body took the chance to reflect on how they go about their business. As with staff, the changes were supported through training. As a result, new members, some of whom have taken on significant responsibilities, bring renewed vigour and rigour to the governing body’s work, and have hit the ground running.
p.2
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
Given the ambition of staff and the governing body, it is no surprise that pupils are confident learners and that parents are equally confident in the leadership of the school. Almost all parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire (Parent View) are positive about the school. A few are critical about communication from staff about what how well the pupils are doing. You recognised this soon after taking the headship and have put a range of opportunities in place for parents to be informed and to get involved.
p.2
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
It is clear from talking with pupils, watching them in class and looking at their work that they enjoy learning very much. They arrive on time in the mornings, are ready to start work promptly and take responsibility to complete their work as best they can by themselves. Pupils are proud to have their work on display in class and in corridors. Visitors cannot fail to see that reading, writing and art work are valued and celebrated. At breaktimes, pupils of all ages play well together. Older pupils often go out of their way to support younger ones.
p.2
Short inspection of Wood Ley Community Primary School
The leadership team makes sure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff are well informed about a wide range of relevant issues for keeping children safe. This includes the recent training for ‘Prevent’. The governing body plays an active part in checking the school’s arrangements. Governors are well trained and, in order to maintain their high levels of vigilance, are about to set up a working party to share their safeguarding responsibilities more widely.
p.2
Inspection findings
Leaders and governors have an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching and pupils’ performance. There is a clear line of sight from what pupils can do by the end of each year to the leadership team’s judgements on the quality of each aspect of the school’s work. But by focusing on attainment as the main measure of success, the leadership team is not making the best use of the information available about pupils’ progress.
p.3
Inspection findings
Pupils’ achievements at the end of the Reception Year, in the phonic check in Year 1 and at the end of Year 2 show an improving trend towards standards that are at least in line with national averages. This trend is also seen in the achievement of pupils in other years as they move through the school.
p.3
Inspection findings
Additional funding is spent appropriately to support the pupils for whom it is intended. The leadership team make sure that the funding is used effectively according to pupils’ individual needs and circumstances. As a consequence, they achieve as well as other pupils in the school.
p.3
Inspection findings
The cycle of checking and evaluating what pupils can do has become increasingly systematic and efficient. As a result, staff have the information they need to plan pupils’ work effectively. Currently, this is working particularly well to identify the gaps in learning for those pupils whose learning was interrupted by changes in their class teacher in the past.
p.3
Inspection findings
Staff apply the school’s marking policy effectively and this works well to encourage pupils to take responsibility for improving their work. Pupils can explain what they have learned, how they have found out new things and how they can use their developing knowledge.
p.3
Inspection findings
There is a lot of work in pupils’ books but sometimes the use of worksheets stifles pupils’ ability to record in sufficient detail what they know and can do. This is particularly the case in the books of older pupils.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that: the new assessment system is refined to include clear measures of pupils’ progress from their individual starting points subject leaders play a full part in checking and reporting on the quality of pupils’ performance in each subject older pupils are expected to learn and use the appropriate skills for recording and presenting their work.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Regional Schools Commissioner and the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During this inspection, I met with you, the deputy headteacher, the special needs coordinator, three governors, the office manager and the staff. I had a conversation on the telephone with a representative from the local authority. I observed and spoke with pupils as they arrived in the morning, in lessons and at breaktimes. Pupils’ work was scrutinised. Thirty-two parents and 21 staff responded to Ofsted’s questionnaire; 20 parents and five staff gave written comments. There were no responses to the pupils’ online questionnaire. I spoke with pupils throughout the day to gain their views and looked at the school’s most recent pupil questionnaire. Documentation was analysed regarding pupils’ performance.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion