Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

First College

Inspected — · published 15 Apr 2016 · URN 51841

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nigel Bragg

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PE25 2AR

  • Name on report verified

    First College Lincs

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelysuccessfullyeffectiveconsistentlyoutstandingvery highcaringsafe
Criticismnot consistentlyconcernsnot alwaysnot sufficientlytoo oftennot yetyet tonot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1407w+40
  • What needs to improve145w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,535
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs Sheila Blackett Learning Contracts and Quality Assurance Manager First College Lincs 19 Ida Road Skegness Lincolnshire PE25 2AR

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

Following the short inspection on 9–10 March 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in March 2010.

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

The senior management team continues to nurture a caring and safe learning environment that effectively supports good apprentice and trainee achievement. The training outcomes for the majority of apprentices are good with high apprenticeship success rates in most sector areas.

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

Productive partnership working has allowed the college to make a valuable contribution to skills development within Lincolnshire. You have responded effectively to local and national initiatives, and successfully introduced new programmes to meet demand. For example, the implementation of traineeships has been good and resulted in high progression to apprenticeship training.

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

Since the previous inspection, leaders and managers have maintained a clear focus on establishing and monitoring challenging expectations of performance. Quality assurance and improvement arrangements have continued to raise standards and meet the needs of learners and employers.

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

You have a sound understanding of your organisation, and the training environment in which it works, that allows you to plan appropriate actions to address areas for improvement. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of First College Lincs

Leaders and managers have maintained the supportive culture noted at the previous inspection. This culture successfully promotes the protection and safety of learners and staff. You have established an appropriate range of safeguarding procedures and policies that are subject to regular review to ensure relevance and effectiveness. All staff, work and training places are subject to thorough appropriate vetting which has contributed well to learners feeling both safe and protected. However, the impact of ‘Prevent’ training on the professional practice of subcontractor staff has not yet been evaluated.

p.2

Short inspection of First College Lincs

You have maintained good links with social workers, police, community and specialist agencies to help learners in the rare instances when they raise concerns. Learners demonstrate a good understanding of how safeguarding applies to them. They are confident that staff will both listen and quickly respond to situations or incidents that are making them anxious.

p.2

Short inspection of First College Lincs

Leaders and managers have given a high priority to ensuring that staff and learners have a good appreciation of the risks posed by radicalisation. Learners generally have a good understanding of British values with regard to their personal and work life. However, you recognise that managers need to undertake further work in this area to ensure that all learners’ understanding is consistently high enough.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Leaders and managers have maintained the good quality of teaching, learning and assessment noted at the previous inspection. Improvements in the quality assurance processes, using direct observation of taught sessions, correctly identify key areas of better practice and required actions to raise standards. However, records of completed observations do not consistently focus on the learning taking place and the progress made by learners. This was an area for improvement at the previous inspection. The quality assurance of guidance interviews does not always place sufficient emphasis on how well the activity improves learners’ understanding of the available options.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The senior management team has further developed its good use of partnership working, as identified at the previous inspection. It has addressed successfully the apprenticeship recruitment needs of local employers and regional objectives. Managers have continued their careful design of the apprenticeship training programmes to ensure that timing and delivery methods fit the requirements of employers and learners. In many cases, staff provide the entire programme on the employer’s site to reduce the impact on business performance and ensure that opportunities for assessment that arise in the workplace are fully utilised. This approach has resulted in sustained levels of recruitment by employers.  Well-focused strategic planning has resulted in the introduction of a wide variety and level of provision. Managers have been particularly effective in responding to the training needs of the local hospitality and leisure industry.

p.2

Inspection findings

Across Lincolnshire, you have responded well to the staff development objectives of small- to medium-sized employers, many of which are widely geographically dispersed. Use of well-managed subcontracting arrangements has allowed a large public sector employer to benefit from the appropriate range of programmes offered by the college. The quality and performance management of subcontractors are good. Managers effectively use the self- assessment process and associated action plan to drive improvements and raise standards for all learners.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Since the previous inspection, the senior management team has successfully implemented all aspects of traineeships. Trainees receive useful careers guidance that helps them make realistic decisions regarding their future options. Staff are adept at tailoring work experience places so individual trainees develop useful vocational and employability skills alongside a sound work ethic. Trainees value the good classroom-based teaching and learning they receive and are able to apply their learning appropriately within their workplace. For example, a trainee successfully used his newly acquired reading, writing and computer skills to support and improve the workplace’s administrative function. Success rates for English and mathematics qualifications are good. Where they leave the traineeship earlier than planned, trainees are suitably encouraged and supported to complete their qualifications. Progress to a positive outcome for the significant majority of

p.3

Inspection findings

trainees is good. It is noteworthy that progress into apprenticeships for the previous academic year was high. In-year data indicate that learners are making good or better progress. Key aspects of the programme are subject to appropriate quality assurance arrangements. However, managers have yet to evaluate the implementation of the whole programme. Performance management is good and used well by managers to promote high standards and improvement. Staff understand and value the well-established process for the appraisal and observation of taught sessions, and welcome the constructive and fair performance feedback given. Managers make good use of this, and other relevant key indicators, to both manage staff performance and plan an extensive range of training and development.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The senior management team places significant and appropriate emphasis on effectively communicating with all staff. It makes good use of frequent formal and informal meetings, and an annual training day takes place to inform staff of planned initiatives and gather their views on the draft self-assessment report and business plan. The quality improvement group effectively monitors progress in achieving identified improvement actions.  Managers regularly collect learners’ views throughout their training programmes. However, analysis of survey results does not sufficiently identify trends across all relevant learner groups.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Since the previous inspection, managers have maintained the good rate of learners’ progress and success rates for the significant majority of apprentices, particularly within business administration. In other sector areas the success rates are very high. The personal support available to learners is outstanding and contributes to high rates of programme retention and learner satisfaction.

p.4

Inspection findings

 All learners receive an appropriate initial assessment that trainers effectively use to plan training and support needs. They enjoy their learning, both on and off the job. Learners develop good workplace skills and knowledge. The quality of their completed work and portfolios is of a good standard. Learners are able to use their newly acquired skills and qualifications to help them progress and become more useful members of their workplace. For example, the application of learning by an information and communication technology (ICT) apprentice helped in the development of spreadsheets to meet business needs, improved social media use for customer promotion campaigns and supported the development of a large circulation newsletter.

p.4

Inspection findings

 You have successfully introduced strategies to improve learners’ understanding of equality and diversity, which is now good. This improvement has given learners a better appreciation of how to use their learning to be more effective in the workplace. For example, following training, an apprentice was able to empathise and better deal with customers with hearing impairments.

p.4

Inspection findings

 All apprentices and trainees receive appropriate reviews of their progress. As a result, they are generally able to identify what short-term actions they need to complete to achieve further. However, as judged at the previous inspection, objective setting is not consistently effective for all learners, particularly where long-term targets are established. Too often they do not include enough detail to guide learners’ actions or are not demanding enough to challenge the most-able, for example through the use of targets for additional unit completion.

p.4

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and governors should ensure that:

p.5

Next steps for the provider

 the evaluation of: – the impact of ‘Prevent’ training for subcontractor staff, and – traineeship programmes implementation

p.5

Next steps for the provider

result in an action planning process that leads to improvement.

p.5

Next steps for the provider

 the use of quality assurance arrangements for: – taught sessions by observation includes a clear and documented evaluation of the learning and progress that is achieved – careers guidance interviews include an evaluation of their impact on learners understanding of the available options.

p.5

Next steps for the provider

 surveys of learners’ views should be analysed to identify trends across all groups of learners

p.5

Next steps for the provider

 the quality of target setting for learners, particularly for long-term objectives, needs improving so it is both consistently effective and appropriately challenging of the most able.

p.5

Next steps for the provider

I am copying this letter to the Skills Funding Agency and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.5

Information about the inspection

During the short inspection, the learning contracts and quality assurance manager as nominee assisted us. Inspectors met with senior leaders, managers, staff, employers, apprentices and trainees, using both ‘face-to-face’ and telephone interviews. Key documents, including those related to self-assessment, performance and safeguarding were reviewed. Inspectors visited training and workplaces to discuss with learners their experience of the received training, assess their progress and scrutinise the quality of completed work. In addition, we observed teaching, learning and assessment sessions.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion