Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 324
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of complaint
On 7 March 2016, we received information that raised concerns about: the supervision of children; procedures for dealing with accidents; partnership with parents; and support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.1
Summary of complaint
We do not investigate to prove or disprove a concern but we look into the information we receive to see if the registered provider is meeting the legal requirements.
p.1
Summary of complaint
On 14 March 2016, we carried out an unannounced visit to the nursery. During the visit, we found that the provider has effective systems in place for dealing with accidents. This information is clearly recorded in the accident records and parents are informed of any injury sustained by their child on the same day. We also found that sufficient staff were qualified to administer first-aid treatment.
p.1
Summary of complaint
Staff were effectively deployed throughout the nursery and they offered good levels of support and supervision to all children. We found that the provider also has suitable systems in place to support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. They are cared for by qualified staff and some of the nursery sessions include designated one-to-one support.
p.1
Summary of complaint
Although it was not part of the original concern, we found that some records relating to staff qualifications and suitability checks were not easily accessible and available for inspection. Therefore, we issued a notice to improve that requires the registered provider to:
p.1
Summary of complaint
ensure that records relating to staff qualifications and suitability checks are easily accessible and available for inspection. We are satisfied with the action taken by the provider. The provider remains registered with Ofsted.
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements.
p.2
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.2
Publication of complaints
For further information about the complaints process please view the Concerns and complaints about childminders and childcare providers leaflet (Reference no. 080120)
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion