Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder 137997

Inspected 14 Mar 2016 · URN 137997

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Rachel Hurford

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Mar 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Rachel Hurford

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    137997

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−72Very criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseindependentsafeeffectiveengagingconsistent
Criticismweaknessesbreachbreachesineffectivepoorat riskweaknot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings404w−58
  • Leadership123w−81
  • What needs to improve119w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
634
shorter than usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 7
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 14 March 2016 20 June 2011

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not have an effective knowledge of the signs and symptoms that may cause concern regarding a child's welfare. This compromises children's well-being and is also a breach of the Childcare Register.  The childminder does not provide children with a sufficient range of toys and resources that they can access independently to engage their interest and challenge their learning.  The childminder does not plan purposeful activities to support children's next steps in learning and promote their development. Children do not make the progress that they should.  The childminder does not develop partnerships with other settings that children attend to support a more consistent approach to children's care and learning.  The childminder does not always encourage children to be independent. She feeds children who are capable and old enough to feed themselves.  The childminder does not have a robust self-evaluation process in place to aid her in

p.1

This provision is inadequate

identifying weaknesses in her practice, knowledge and provision. She does not seek the views of parents and children to shape her service.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder provides a safe environment for children. She helps children learn to keep themselves safe, for example, keeping nearby when on outings.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that children can independently access and choose the resources they need for their play 04/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 plan purposeful play activities to fully support children's next steps in learning 04/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 develop partnership working with other early years providers children attend to support consistency in learning and care. 04/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 develop opportunities for children to strengthen their independence skills, with special consideration to mealtimes  make effective use of self-evaluation, including the use of the views of parents and children, to identify breaches in requirements and target areas for improvement in practice.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector held discussions with the childminder at convenient times during the inspection.  The inspector sampled documents that the childminder uses to support her practice.  The inspector observed interactions between the children and the childminder.  The inspector spoke to parents on the telephone to gain their feedback.  The inspector viewed all areas of the home used for childminding.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has a poor knowledge of the signs that may indicate a child is at risk, which does not promote children's welfare at all times. The childminder does not evaluate her practice and identify areas for development to highlight weaknesses in her provision and improve outcomes for children. She shares information with parents about what their children have been doing, although she does not offer parents or children the opportunity to share their views about the setting. The childminder does not provide adequate resources that are accessible for children to explore and use in their play. The childminder does not have effective partnerships with other early years settings that children attend to promote continuity in their care and learning.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The childminder does not use information from her observations of children's progress to plan suitable activities that promote their next steps in learning. She has weak teaching skills. For example, while children were completing number puzzles, the childminder missed opportunities to encourage the children to count and did not identify that they needed help to complete the jigsaw. The childminder promotes children's language and communication skills sufficiently. She supports children who are learning English as an additional language to develop their language skills adequately.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weaknesses in safeguarding compromise children's well-being. The childminder does not make toys and resources freely available to enable children to take the lead in their play and learning. She does not encourage children to develop independent skills, such as feeding themselves. The childminder teaches children to share and have respect for the environment. Children behave well. The childminder takes children to local parks and playgroups to meet and socialise with other children and take part in physical play.

p.3

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children are not well prepared for school or the next stage of learning. They do not take part in stimulating and engaging activities that encourage them to explore and learn for themselves.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 137997 Local authority Merton Inspection number 836526 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 2

p.4

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 20 June 2011

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 1993. She lives in Tooting, in the London Borough of Merton. She works Monday to Friday, 8am until 7pm, all year round.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion