Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Peterborough

Inspected 24 Mar 2016 · published 13 Apr 2016 · URN EY399380

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Susan Sykes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Mar 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Susan Sykes

  • Early years verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY399380

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−11Mixedmore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoystrengthsconfidentgood progressaccuratelycaringhappywell behaved
Criticismweaknessesfailednot effectivefailureat riskweaknesscompromiseddisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings342w+17
  • Leadership168w−68
  • What needs to improve446w+18

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
938
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 30%About the inspection 35%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 24 March 2016 11 December 2012

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder has failed to notify Ofsted of a person aged over 16 years living on the premises. Ofsted has not been given the necessary information to be able to complete the assessment of the suitability of this person.  The childminder does not use her observations of the children to plan activities or identify the next steps in their learning. This means that some areas of learning are not thoroughly planned for.  The childminder does not encourage parents to contribute information about their children's learning and development to accurately establish starting points or ongoing assessments.  The childminder does not fully understand the value of the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years in helping to inform more precise assessment of strengths and areas where progress may be less than expected.  Children's communication and language development is not fully promoted in the

p.1

This provision is inadequate

setting. Opportunities for children to engage in meaningful conversations are sometimes interrupted by background noise.  The childminder has not implemented a rigorous self-evaluation process to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the provision.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder is calm and caring and the children are happy and enjoy the time they spend in her home. She is a good role model and children are well behaved and confident in her care.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 provide Ofsted with information about persons aged 16 years and over living on the premises, including an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check, in order for the suitability assessment process to be completed 14/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 use observations of children's learning to plan activities and identify next steps to further support their progress across all areas of learning 14/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 develop ways for parents to contribute towards their children's learning and development; use this information to inform their starting points and when reviewing children's ongoing progress 14/06/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve the arrangements for completing the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years to inform more accurate assessments of children's development. 14/06/2016 To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 extend opportunities for children to develop their communication and language skills, minimising the risk of background disruption to their thinking and speaking  strengthen the self-evaluation processes to ensure that areas for development are accurately identified and addressed, including parents' and children's views.

p.3

Inspection activities

 The inspector viewed the areas used for childminding. She talked to the children and childminder at appropriate times throughout the inspection and observed a variety of activities.  The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability and qualifications of the childminder as well as a selection of policies and procedures, including safeguarding. She discussed risk assessments and the childminder's self-evaluation process.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder. She discussed children's learning and development and sampled their records, and looked at the planning documentation.  The inspector took account of the views of parents by reading a number of their comments on questionnaires and letters obtained by the childminder.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The suitability of a person living on the premises has not been assessed by Ofsted as a result of the childminder's failure to provide the required information. The childminder is, however, aware of the possible signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect which may indicate that a child is at risk of harm. This helps her to take steps to protect children. Although the childminder states that she has completed progress checks for children between the ages of two and three years, she does not make best use of the information from these to assess children's progress more precisely. Self-evaluation does not clearly identify the strengths and weaknesses of the childminder's provision. This results in areas of weakness not being addressed. The environment is safe and secure, and the childminder undertakes daily risk assessments for all areas of her home. Parents' written comments show that they value the childminder's

p.4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

service highly. The childminder undertakes some professional development to develop her practice.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The childminder makes written observations of children, however, she does not use the information from these to plan precisely for children's next steps in learning. As a result, some activities do not have a clear focus to ensure children are consistently making good progress in their all-round learning and development. Parents are not asked for detailed information about their children's starting points or encouraged to share their child's learning and development achievements from the home environment. They do not have a clear picture of what their child is achieving or how they can support further learning at home. Children do enjoy a range of activities that the childminder offers. Children excitedly work together as they search for and match the colours and sizes of eggs helping to support their mathematical development. The childminder engages children in some conversation during activities, valuing their contributions. However, constant

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

background music and the use of the television poses a distraction when children are trying to think and explain what they are doing.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Children's safety is compromised as a result of the weaknesses in leadership and management. Parents are not assured of the suitability of some persons living on the premises. The childminder is a positive role model for children and they share a good relationship. She sets clear and consistent boundaries and children respond well; their behaviour is good. The children enjoy taking trips out to the local park, which helps to support their physical development. The childminder has an effective settling-in procedure that ensures a smooth transition from home. She works with parents to meet children's care needs and follow routines from home. This helps to promote children's self-esteem and emotional well-being.

p.4

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children are not making as much progress in their learning and development as possible. They are gaining some of the basic skills they need for their next stage in learning in pre- school or school. For example, they concentrate intently as they use a range of resources to decorate their Easter eggs. They are becoming confident and independent as they select their activity of choice and play together with their peers. However, the childminder does not always plan challenging activities to further children's progress in their learning and development.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY399380 Local authority Peterborough Inspection number 1036923 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 4 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4

p.6

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 11 December 2012

p.6

Telephone number

The childminder was registered in 2009 and lives in Hampton Vale, Peterborough. She operates all year round from 8.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.

p.6

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.6

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion