Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder EY278605
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Alison Southard
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY278605
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder's assessments of children's progress are not precise enough. p.1
- She does not accurately identify their next steps. p.1
- At times, the childminder does not provide children with enough challenge to ensure that they all, including those learning English as an additional language, consistently make good progress. p.1
- The childminder does not consistently plan experiences to extend what children already know and can do. p.1
- The childminder does not gain enough information from parents about children's skills and abilities when they first start, to support children's learning right from the start. p.1
- The childminder and her co-childminder reflect on their teaching practice regularly but self-evaluation is not yet rigorous enough to identify weaknesses accurately and to ensure they make ongoing improvements. p.1
- The childminder does not make the best use of opportunities to promote children's early writing skills. p.1
- Children eat healthy meals and develop good hygienic practices. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“The childminder supports children's physical well-being effectively.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 709
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 21 March 2016 20 October 2010
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The childminder's assessments of children's progress are not precise enough. She does not accurately identify their next steps. At times, the childminder does not provide children with enough challenge to ensure that they all, including those learning English as an additional language, consistently make good progress. The childminder does not consistently plan experiences to extend what children already know and can do. The childminder does not gain enough information from parents about children's skills and abilities when they first start, to support children's learning right from the start. The childminder and her co-childminder reflect on their teaching practice regularly but self-evaluation is not yet rigorous enough to identify weaknesses accurately and to ensure they make ongoing improvements. The childminder does not make the best use of opportunities to promote children's early writing skills.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children eat healthy meals and develop good hygienic practices. Children form positive relationships with the childminder. They engage in some interesting activities, including outings and visits to the local community. The childminder helps children develop good social skills. They regularly mix with other children. They learn to respect others and behave well.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that observation and assessment of children's progress is accurate and precise, and used to identify effective next steps in learning, to fully challenge children to achieve consistently good progress across all areas of learning 25/05/2016
p.2
Due Date
plan activities that build on what children know and can do. 25/05/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
seek more detailed information from parents about children's learning and development when children first start, to support their learning from the outset develop self-evaluation to improve the quality of provision and outcomes for children provide children with greater opportunities to develop their early writing skills.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector checked the areas used for childminding. The inspector examined a sample of policies, children's records and other documents. The inspector observed the childminder and children during play. The inspector read feedback from parents and spoke to children to gain their views. The inspector discussed the childminder's self-evaluation process.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The childminder does not ensure that she reflects on her practice effectively to identify all areas for improvement, particularly regarding children's learning and development. For example, she does not monitor children's progress accurately, to help them make consistently good progress in all areas of their learning. The childminder attends regular training and shares ideas with other providers to keep up to date with changes in legislation to support her professional development. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder knows the procedures to follow if she has concerns for a child's welfare. Parents speak highly of the good relationships they have with the childminder and her co- minder and the care their children receive.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder supports children in their play and shows an interest in what they are doing and saying. She engages children well in conversations and repeats words to promote their communication skills. The childminder observes children but does not effectively use what she learns to assess their development precisely and identify clear next steps in their learning. This means she is unable to provide challenging activities consistently that build on what children already know and can do. Nonetheless, the childminder speaks generally about children's progress and shares this with parents to involve them in their children's learning. The childminder forms positive relationships with other settings children attend and shares information to provide consistency for children.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
The childminder offers settling-in visits for children; they settle well. She holds discussions with parents when children first start but she does not gain enough information about children's skills and abilities, in order to plan effectively for their learning from the outset. Children learn how to keep themselves safe. For instance, older children discuss how they must be careful with the china plates at lunchtime. The childminder supports children's physical well-being effectively. For example, she provides children with lots of time for outdoor play and visits to local parks and play areas.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Overall, children are motivated to learn and make steady progress. They develop confidence and good levels of self-esteem. For example, children are proud of their achievements as they put on their coats and shoes. Children enjoy looking at books independently and with the childminder. However, there are few opportunities for them to develop their early writing skills. Children learn about diversity and the word around them. Overall, they develop appropriate skills in readiness for their move to school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY278605 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 833499 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 9
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection 20 October 2010
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2004. She works with her husband, who is her co- childminder, in Weybridge, Surrey. The childminder works from 7.45am until 6.30pm for most of the year. The childminder has a relevant qualification at level 3. The childminder receives funding for free early education for children aged three and four years.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion