Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jayne Ashman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jayne Ashman

  • Postcode verified

    DE55 4JE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+27Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivevery effectiveeffectiveeffectivelypositiveskilledpositivelyclearly
Criticismweaknessesconcerntoo manynot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings644w+28
  • What needs to improve363w+5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
999
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%What needs to improve 36%

Full report text

Mrs Helina Kirkman Acting Headteacher Somerlea Park Junior School Bank Street Somercotes Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 4JE

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

Following my visit to your school on 7 March 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions taken since the monitoring inspection conducted in October 2015.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

Senior leaders, governors and the local authority are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

HMI recommends that urgent action is taken to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

 improve the quality of teaching  ensure that leaders new to their role receive effective support  refine school improvement planning to focus on the key issues identified at the last section 5 inspection  implement the actions identified by the review of pupil premium funding. Ofsted

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Somerlea Park

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you and the Chair of the Governing Body. I also met with two senior representatives from the local authority and the headteacher mentor, who is currently working with you for two days a week. I reviewed the school’s single central record of recruitment checks, the school’s strategy and improvement plan and information about pupils’ progress and attendance. The local authority action plan was also discussed. You and I conducted a walk of the school and observed learning in all year groups.

p.2

Context

The substantive headteacher is not in school. You have been the acting headteacher since November 2015. Two assistant headteachers have been appointed from within the school, on a temporary basis. Currently, a headteacher mentor is supporting your work for two days each week. The school is now being supported by two senior advisers from the local authority. A review of pupil premium spending and its impact took place in October 2015.

p.2

Main findings

The previous monitoring visit in October 2015 identified that a great deal of improvement was required if the school was to be judged as a good school at its next section 5 inspection. Under difficult circumstances your leadership has made a difference. There has clearly been positive change within the school since I conducted the first monitoring visit in October. However, there is still much to be done if the school is to become a good school by the time of its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has provided highly effective support. The Chair of the Governing Body is experienced, skilled and well informed. He has committed a great deal of energy and time to ensure that the issues identified at the previous monitoring visit are being addressed. A review of governance took place after the section 5 inspection in April 2015. Governors have responded positively to the findings of this review and have refined their ways of working to make sure that their support is increasingly effective. Governors are playing a critical role in the improvement journey for the school. They know that weaknesses in teaching and leadership remain.

p.2

Main findings

You appreciate the very effective support you receive from the headteacher mentor. The newly appointed assistant headteachers have not had the support they need to carry out their roles effectively. Making sure that leaders receive the appropriate support is a key priority. Additionally, the local authority and governors need to be satisfied that the support provided is sharply focused on improving pupils’ outcomes and makes enough difference. Leaders have worked effectively to make sure that the school improvement plan now has clear actions and appropriate success criteria. This plan is a working document and you are using it to steer improvement activity. However, it remains a lengthy document. We discussed the need to focus on the key priorities that will ensure that the school becomes a good school. Leaders, governors and local authority advisers need to monitor more regularly the progress the school is making because the pace

p.2

Main findings

The information about pupils’ achievement is clearer and better understood by teaching staff and leaders. Classroom teachers are now able to plan learning appropriately because there is greater understanding of pupils’ starting points and the progress that is needed for pupils to achieve age-related expectations. You lead pupil progress meetings for each class to check that pupils are making the progress expected. A well-understood process is now in place to make sure that classroom teachers are held to account for the progress that pupils make within their class. Nevertheless, too many pupils are still not making the progress that they should. This includes those supported through the pupil premium funding. It is important that leaders complete all of the actions following the review of pupil premium funding which took place in October 2015, in order to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Main findings

There is a long legacy of underperformance within this school. We discussed the weaknesses evident from our observations of learning. The quality of teaching remains an area of concern. The focus must now be on making sure that teaching quality rapidly improves so that pupils are helped to catch up quickly.

p.3

Main findings

I intend to carry out further monitoring inspections. At my next visit I will conduct further observations of learning and look at the work in pupils’ books.

p.3

External support

The school is supported by two senior local authority advisers. This is welcome. The local authority support now needs to be focused on helping leaders, new to role, accelerate pupils’ progress. It is important that you continue to benefit from the support of the headteacher mentor.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion