Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Feb 2016
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Pearson
- Postcode verified
HU9 4HD
- Name on report verified
Oakfield School
- URN verified
118140
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of support and care for young people is excellent. p.1
- The purpose-built residential accommodation is superb. p.1
- The quality of the residential premises is superb. p.6
- Within each house there is an excellent range of stimulating leisure pursuits including board games, books, musical instruments and laptops. p.6
- The team of staff provide an excellent quality of care. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Where technical jargon is used to describe holds used in restraint records, add an explanation to clarify what the terminology means. p.2
- Seek and respond to experts’ advice about how often the residential provision fire risk assessment should be reviewed. p.2
- Conduct separate analyses of restraints and young people who go missing in school time and residential time in the independent visitor’s half-termly monitoring. p.2
- Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 2 of 12 p.2
- Arrangements for ensuring young people are safe and protected from harm are generally sound. p.7
- Some aspects of safeguarding practice are not yet sufficiently robust. p.7
- Sometimes young people go missing without permission. p.7
- The staff search for them and notify the police appropriately. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety10
“The quality of the residential premises is superb.” p.6
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,623
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Oakfield School Hopewell Road, Hull, HU9 4HD
p.1
Inspection dates 08/02/2016 to 10/02/2016
p.1
Good 2
The quality of care and support Outstanding 1 How well children and young people are protected Requires improvement 3
p.1
Good 2
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good 2
p.1
The residential provision is good because:
The quality of support and care for young people is excellent. The staff provide care that is highly individualised to the specific needs of each young person. The views of young people are an integral part of the organisation of the residential provision. As a result they feel involved and respected for their views and this raises their self-esteem. The purpose-built residential accommodation is superb. Young people each have their own single ensuite bedroom. Other facilities are also of a high order. This was summed up by one young person as ‘like a home from home.’ The arrangements to safeguard the welfare of young people are mostly sound. They feel safe and there are no concerns about bullying. Sometimes young people leave the premises without permission. A national minimum standard is unmet because the school’s policy on missing persons does not reflect government statutory guidance or that of the local authority.
p.1
The residential provision is good because:
Consistency is important due to risks young people may face by going absent. There are other shortfalls relating to safety. The fire risk assessment has not been reviewed since 2013. Advice from fire prevention experts is that this should be annual. The recording of restraints does not provide sufficient accountability as it relies on the use of technical jargon to explain how the restraint was conducted. The senior leadership team are passionate in their aim to provide the highest quality of care. They have developed robust arrangements for quality assurance including seeking the views of young people; sending questionnaires to parents and professionals; self-evaluation against the Ofsted inspection criteria and regular monitoring and reporting by experienced, independent experts. Half termly monitoring reports are not fully informative about restraints and young people who go missing from the residential provision.
p.1
schools
The school does not meet the following national minimum standard for residential special schools:
p.2
schools
15.6 The school's procedures are compatible with the local runaway and missing from home and care (RMFHC) protocols and procedures applicable to the area where the school is located. Where children placed out of authority go missing, the head of care (or school equivalent) follows the local RMFHC protocol and complies with and makes staff aware of any other processes required by the placing authority.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Where technical jargon is used to describe holds used in restraint records, add an explanation to clarify what the terminology means. Seek and respond to experts’ advice about how often the residential provision fire risk assessment should be reviewed. Conduct separate analyses of restraints and young people who go missing in school time and residential time in the independent visitor’s half-termly monitoring. Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 2 of 12
p.2
Information about this inspection
Ofsted gave the school one hour’s notice of the inspection of its residential provision. Evidence came from one-to-one and group discussions with residential pupils; discussions with parents of five young people; analysis of written surveys from 22 residential pupils, 4 parents of residential pupils and 32 residential staff; one-to-one discussions with residential staff, the headteacher and the head of care; discussion with the governor responsible for residential care; assessment of the school’s policies, records and young people’s case files; a tour of the residential houses and observations of residential routines.
p.3
Inspection team
Steve Pearson Lead social care inspector Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 3 of 12
p.3
Information about this school
Oakfield School is a maintained residential special school for 80 boys and girls aged 11- 16 years, 35 of whom reside at the school during the week in term-time. Residential accommodation is provided in six houses on the school site. Five houses each accommodate six pupils in single, ensuite bedrooms. A sixth house is designed for four pupils with physical disabilities. The school is situated in Hull and caters for pupils with emotional, social and mental health difficulties. The school’s residential provision was last inspected on 23 June 2014. At the current inspection there were 24 young people resident. Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 4 of 12
p.4
Good
As a result of the quality of care provided, young people make excellent progress across a range of areas including academic attendance and achievement, social, personal and emotional development. Parents and young people gave abundant examples of how residential care has had a dramatically positive effect on development. For example, one young person said, ‘I used to be shy before I started to stay in residence. Now I ask for help so I’m doing better in school.’ And a parent said, ‘My son has a lot more confidence now. His behaviour is much better and his temper is a lot better.’
p.5
Good
Young people gain social skills from mixing with other children in the houses. The also meet other young people in the community for example, at cadet meetings. Several parents commented about how their child had benefited from having friendships with other young people in the residential houses.
p.5
Good
Young people’s behaviour is good. The inspector observed their interactions with each other. They are considerate and have good manners. Young people get on well with each other and with the staff. One young person summed this up saying, ‘I like coming to stay in the house. We get on with each other and with the staff. We argue sometimes but there isn’t any bullying.’
p.5
Good
Staff have a real commitment to ensuring the views of the young people are represented in the running of the residential houses. For example, young people are invited to attend regular house meetings and the staff fully involve them in major decisions about the leisure activity programme and décor of each house.
p.5
Good
The head of care and team of staff are all clear about the purposes of residential care. A primary aim is to help young people become confident and self-reliant in preparation for adulthood. Consequently young people of all ages are involved in an independence programme to help them gain relevant knowledge and skills for the future. Independence plans are thoroughly researched and well-structured. They provide a focus of activity for each young person. Targets are set with each young person and their parent or carer. The staff then help them to focus on the targets to help them make real progress over time. A parent summed this up saying, ‘My son is now more confident. He’s better at looking after himself. It’s made a world of difference for him.’
p.5
Good
The staff all have thorough training in child protection issues. They clearly understand each young person’s safeguarding needs and how to meet them.
p.5
Good
The head of care leads and manages the residential provision very effectively. He is passionate about providing the highest quality of care and is effective in motivating the staff by his enthusiasm. Robust quality monitoring systems are in place to help continuous improvement in the quality of care provided.
p.5
The quality of care and support Outstanding
Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 5 of 12 The needs of young people and how these are to be met on a day-to-day basis are comprehensively assessed and recorded clearly and accurately in individualised care plans. These are kept up to date by each child’s key worker who maintains an overarching responsibility for their progress within the residential setting. Young people and their parents and carers are fully involved in the initial assessment of needs and in deciding what targets are to be met during the residential term. These are monitored carefully throughout the term to make sure of continuous progress.
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
The quality of the residential premises is superb. Each young person has a single, ensuite bedroom. One young person proudly said, ‘I love my bedroom. It’s my own space and I can put up my posters and pictures. We are each given £30 to decide how we want our rooms to look.’ Each house is clean, tidy, and well-maintained. Another young person said, ‘It’s like a home from home.’
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
The staff carefully plan and evaluate leisure activities to achieve best outcomes. Consequently, young people make significant progress in their physical, emotional and social development.
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
Within each house there is an excellent range of stimulating leisure pursuits including board games, books, musical instruments and laptops. The staff encourage board games and other interactive leisure activities because of the social benefits gained. Such benefits also arise from a carefully considered range of external activities. These include membership of army cadets, swimming, walks in the local area and outdoor camps. Young people gain leadership and organisational skills by being encouraged to organise and lead some activities. One young person summed this up saying, ‘I love staying in the residence. I like the activities because they are fun and we do all sorts of different things.’
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
Arrangements for promoting young people's health are robust. The staff help young people be physically healthy by encouraging them to take part in activities which involve exercise and movement. One of the house managers carefully coordinates the menus and meal arrangements to ensure diets are nutritious and tasty. The staff regularly hold culture nights at which they prepare foods reflecting those eaten by people from other countries. One young person said, ‘I like the food. We get plenty and it’s all homemade.’ The school has developed an emotional well-being team who provide young people with effective support to gain mental health.
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
The team of staff provide an excellent quality of care. This has a dramatic effect on young people's progress. Young people feel settled and secure by consistency of staffing, clear boundaries and well-developed relationships with the adults around them. A young person said, ‘The staff care and respect us.’ Parents were unanimous in their praise of the care provided. For example, one parent said, 'The residential care has been the making of my son. It’s the best thing that could have happened to him. He’s happy, his behaviour has settled down massively and he’s more confident.’ Another parent said, ‘I can’t praise the staff highly enough. I don’t know what we’d have done if our son hadn’t come here.’
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
The staff fully include young people in how the residential houses are run and organised. Young people are represented on the residence council meetings, and each house holds regular house meetings. These are effective in reflecting the wishes of children. For Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 6 of 12 example, one young person said, ‘We have house meetings where we say what we think and if possible the staff will sort things for us. We said we would like rugby posts on the school fields and we said what flowers we wanted in the garden. And the staff sorted them both for us.’ Consequently young people feel included, empowered and valued.
p.6
The quality of care and support Outstanding
Young people can contact their families at any reasonable time. Each house has a cordless phone which they can use in privacy to ring home. Families said they can also ring their child at any time and the staff keep in close contact with them. This helps young people feel reassured where necessary and means care needs are well met. One parent summed this up saying, ‘We can ring our son any time and he can ring us. We also discuss their behaviour with the staff and we share tips about how to help him behave better. It works well.’
p.7
improvement
Arrangements for ensuring young people are safe and protected from harm are generally sound. Some aspects of safeguarding practice are not yet sufficiently robust.
p.7
improvement
Sometimes young people go missing without permission. The staff search for them and notify the police appropriately. The school is failing to meet a national minimum standard because its procedures about missing children do not reflect government statutory guidance or guidance set by the local authority. For example, school procedures do not offer the opportunity of a discussion with an independent person on their return. This is important as young people may feel safer discussing issues with someone who is not associated with the school. The school’s written procedures also do not make clear the difference between whether a young person who goes off site may be deemed to be ‘missing’ (high risk) or ‘unauthorised absence’ (low risk). Given the dangers young people may experience when they are unsupervised and their whereabouts unknown, it is important that school procedures are consistent with those
p.7
improvement
set by the government and local authority.
p.7
improvement
Professional technicians regularly service the electrical equipment, gas appliances and equipment for preventing, detecting and extinguishing fires. Young people take part in regular fire drills and are aware of how to respond safely. The risks from fire in the residential houses has not been formally reviewed since 2013. Good practice would suggest this should be done annually. The senior leadership team has attempted to address this with those responsible but to date the assessment has not been updated. Although no fire risks are apparent, given that this is a residential setting it is important to review the fire risk assessment regularly.
p.7
improvement
Sometimes the staff physically intervene and restrain young people to protect their welfare. This is done safely and for appropriate reasons. For example, one young person said, ‘The staff do have to restrain us sometimes. I’ve been restrained but it was ok, I was ok about it. Staff only restrain you if you’re going to harm someone.’ There is insufficient detail about how restraints are conducted. This is because the staff rely on technical jargon (for example, a ‘full shield’ or a ‘figure of four hold’) to record how a restraint was conducted. Without extra explanation in the records, external people and young people who may read the accounts in the future may not understand the terms Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 7 of 12 used.
p.7
improvement
Strong arrangements are in place regarding child protection. The school’s policies and procedures on these issues are up-to-date and reviewed regularly. They reflect statutory guidance set by the government. The school has a designated lead person who effectively coordinates and communicates effectively with professionals in external child protection agencies. This person coordinates training in child protection and ensures the staff are up-to-date and knowledgeable about statutory guidance set by the government.
p.8
improvement
Effective measures protect young people from harm, abuse, exploitation and accident. There are no concerns about bullying and if this does arise, the staff respond to it quickly and effectively. Young people spoken with at the inspection all said they felt safe and said bullying is not a problem. One young person summed this up saying, ‘Sometimes bullying does happen. If it does the staff sort it out quickly and it doesn’t happen again.’
p.8
improvement
The head of care and staff team set clear and consistent boundaries for behaviour. This helps young people feel settled and secure. Parents were praiseworthy of how the behaviour of their children had improved over time. For example, one parent said, ‘My son’s behaviour is much better now. He’s much more settled.’ And a young person said, ‘If we are good we get rewards. I like the staff because they are like our Mums and Dads.’
p.8
improvement
Appropriate arrangements ensure that staff recruited to work with young people are suitable and safe.
p.8
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
The senior leadership team has a very clear understanding of the purpose of residential provision and how these aims will be achieved. These are set out in the statement of purpose which is published on the school website. One of the main purposes of residential care is to help young people become more confident and independent, thereby improving their life chances in adulthood. The school is effective in meeting these aims.
p.8
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
The residential provision is managed and organised effectively. The head of care, deputy head of care and house managers have specific roles which integrate together effectively to ensure a high quality of care. For example, one house manager has responsibility for overseeing training and staff supervision, and the deputy head of care is responsible for quality assurance.
p.8
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
The head of care is passionate about providing a high quality of care. He maintains an up-to-date evaluation with the national minimum standards for residential special schools and keeps abreast of national directives and developments from the Department for Education and Ofsted. Good use is made of external professional expertise to gain information and advice about how to improve residential practice. The head of care is proactive in seeking the views of young people, parents and professionals to drive forward improvements in the quality of care. He regularly distributes satisfaction Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 8 of 12 questionnaires to them and evaluates the feedback to drive improvements.
p.8
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
In accordance with the national minimum standards, an external person visits the residential provision half-termly to evaluate the quality of care provided. The visitor has significant previous experience in residential care management. The visitor monitors all the relevant issues, evaluating documentation and talking to young people and staff. Monitoring of restraints and absconding is not fully developed because it does not clarify the difference between incidents in school time and residential time.
p.9
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
The team of residential staff are skilled, experienced and knowledgeable. All staff feel well-supported. For example, of 32 pre-inspection surveys received from members of staff, 93% said that the school makes appropriate provision for their professional development. All established staff have the necessary qualifications for their role and senior staff have appropriate managerial qualifications. All staff receive formal one-to- one supervision with their line manager every half term. This enables them to discuss and resolve any issues of concern and enables young people's progress to be evaluated.
p.9
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
Levels of staffing are good and help to ensure young people are appropriately supervised. One member of staff said, ‘Staffing levels are good and so we can meet children’s needs well.’ A parent also said, ‘There are always enough staff on. The care is very individual to each young person. They don’t treat young people as a group that all have to do the same thing. They treat them as individuals with their own special needs and likes and dislikes. I think that’s great and it’s helped my son improve massively.’
p.9
The impact and effectiveness of leaders and managers Good
Communication with parents is effective. Parents said they could ring up any time and get a clear understanding of how their child was doing. Parents are fully involved in setting clear development targets with their child and with the staff. The staff then work with the young person in a structured but flexible manner to achieve these targets through everyday residential routines. Parents receive a regular written update about their child’s progress which they find useful. Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 9 of 12
p.9
What inspection judgements mean
The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against Inspections of boarding and residential provision in schools: the inspection framework.
p.10
Judgement Description
Outstanding A school where the experiences and progress of children and young people consistently exceeds the standard of good and results in sustained progress and achievement. The outcomes achieved by children and young people are outstanding and the impact the boarding/residential provision has had in supporting this progress and achieving these outcomes is clearly evidenced. Good A school providing effective services which exceed minimum requirements. Children and young people are protected and cared for and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. Requires improvement A school where there are no serious or widespread failures that result in children and young people's welfare not being safeguarded or promoted. However, the overall outcomes, experiences and progress of children and young people are not yet good. Inadequate A school where there are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected or their welfare
p.10
Judgement Description
is not promoted or safeguarded or if their care and experiences are poor and they are not making progress. Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 10 of 12
p.10
School details
Unique reference number 118140 Social care unique reference number SC466264 DfE registration number 810/7007 This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989, as amended by the Care Standards Act 2000, having regard to the national minimum standards for residential special schools. Type of school Residential Special School Number of boarders on roll 35 Gender of boarders Mixed Age range of boarders 11 to16 Headteacher Mrs Rachel Davies Date of previous boarding inspection 23/06/2014 Telephone number 01482 854 588 Email address admin@oakfield.hull.sch.uk Inspection Report Oakfield, 09/02/2016 Page 11 of 12 guidance 'raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/ofsted." If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. if you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.12
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to 'Subscribe'.
p.12
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.co.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion