Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Toad Hall Nursery Ripley

Inspected 23 Feb 2016 · URN 120287

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Feb 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elizabeth Mackey

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    GU23 6DE

  • Name on report verified

    Toad Hall Nursery (Ripley)

  • URN verified

    120287

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−57Criticalmore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedconsistentlyenthusiasmstrengthsweaknesseshappyimproving
Criticismfailconcernsineffectiveweakpoorlackinconsistentinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings518w−82
  • Leadership147w−68
  • What needs to improve239w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
888
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 7
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 34%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 41%

Full report text

Toad Hall Nursery (Ripley) Ripley C of E School, Georgelands, Ripley, Woking, Surrey, GU23 6DE

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 23 February 2016 2 May 2013

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Managers and leaders fail to act quickly when staff report significant concerns about children’s behaviour. This compromises children’s safety and wellbeing.  Leaders do not have a clear picture of how to improve outcomes for children, because they are not evaluating the quality of teaching, or checking the progress children make closely enough.  Supervision for staff is ineffective in improving their practice.  The quality of provision is weak. Staff do not successfully plan to meet children's needs or interests.  Staff do not gather information about children’s learning when they start at nursery or complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years. They do not have a secure picture of how children are progressing.  The kitchen is not hygienically maintained. This poses a health risk.  The arrangements for children's personal care are unsatisfactory, due to a lack of

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Parents develop good relationships with staff and welcome the daily feedback they receive about their child's day.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 develop effective self-evaluation to identify and address ways in which teaching can be improved to a consistently good standard 15/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve the system to monitor the provision to ensure children have a wider range of activities, opportunities and experiences that encourage their curiosity and enthusiasm 15/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 undertake progress checks for children aged between two and three years and share these with parents. These must include a short summary of children’s development in the prime areas of learning 25/03/2016

p.2

Due Date

 introduce systems to monitor the quality of assessment to check that that staff have an accurate understanding of what children need to learn next. Use this information to ensure assessment is consistent and clearly identifies children's progress, their emerging strengths and any areas where additional support is needed 15/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that concerns raised about children’s behaviour are acted upon swiftly to ensure that children receive the help they need 15/04/2016

p.2

Due Date

 promote the good health of children by taking steps to improve the hygiene in the setting, with particular regard to cleanliness of the kitchen 25/03/2016

p.2

Due Date

 develop the quality of staff supervision to ensure it provides opportunities to discuss children's development and wellbeing and provides coaching to improve individual staff’s effectiveness 25/03/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve arrangements for children's personal care, ensuring their privacy is respected at all times. 25/03/2016

p.2

Inspection activities

 This inspection was carried out following Ofsted's risk assessment process.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager to evaluate the quality of teaching.  The Inspector spoke to several parents and took account of their views.  The inspector held a meeting with the managers and discussed the quality of teaching, provision for children’s learning and development and safeguarding procedures.  The inspector sampled a range of documents, including records of children's progress, staff training and staff suitability.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. Managers and senior leaders fail to respond to concerns raised by staff about managing children's behaviour. They have not ensured staff have the skills they need to support individual children’s needs, or that appropriate support is sought as early as possible. This compromises children's safety and wellbeing. The manager has only recently requested the support of the local authority to strengthen the arrangements for safeguarding in the nursery. Self-evaluation does not accurately identify the weaknesses in the provision. The quality of teaching and assessment systems are not effectively monitored. As a result, assessment is inconsistent and there is too little information available about how well children and specific groups of children are progressing. Suitable partnerships are in place with parents and local schools. There is a system in place for supervision. However, it does not provide coaching for staff, or give them an opportunity

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The quality of teaching is weak. There are limited opportunities for children to develop their own ideas or independence. Activities and equipment are basic and do not offer appropriate challenge. The activities and experiences for the oldest children in the pre- school are mundane and staff do not develop children's interest. For example, when children play with cornflour mixed with water, they are curious that it turns to liquid when they touch it. However, staff fail to explore this further with children. Staff do not make the most of the time available to talk with children to promote their language skills. Insufficient information is gathered about children’s learning when they start at nursery and staff do not closely monitor the progress children are making. Consequently, they fail to identify children who may be falling behind in their learning, or those who need additional support.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Most children behave well. However, staff do not have the skills and strategies needed to manage more challenging behaviour. This results in poor behaviour escalating, causing children to become unsettled and needing reassurance from staff. Arrangements for nappy changing are unsuitable. Children are changed in an open area, which does not give them any privacy. The kitchen presents a potential health risk as it is not hygienically maintained. For example, the cooker is not clean and the bins do not have lids. Children do, however, learn about the benefits of healthy eating and their individual dietary needs are well catered for. The outdoor area provides a suitable space for children to develop their physical skills.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children are generally happy and settle quickly on arrival into the nursery routine. They develop good friendships and show concern for one another. Children do not, however, become fully engrossed in their learning, as activities do not provide them with enough challenge and they are not encouraged to be independent. This has an adverse impact on their learning and development and means they are not well prepared for starting school.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number 120287 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 1039403 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 40 Number of children on roll 57 Name of provider Careroom Limited Date of previous inspection 2 May 2013 Telephone number 01483 222020

p.5

Setting details

Toad Hall Nursery, Ripley registered in 1999. It is part of the Toad Hall Nursery Group, which owns 13 other nurseries. The nursery operates from a purpose-built building situated in the grounds of Ripley Church of England School in Ripley, near Woking in Surrey. It is close to the local village and motorway services. The nursery serves the local community and surrounding areas. It offers full and part-time care, school days and flexi- sessions and is open each weekday from 7.30am to 6.30pm for 51 weeks of the year. The nursery closes on bank holidays and for a week between Christmas and New Year. It accepts children aged from three months to eight years of age. The nursery is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education to children aged two, three and four years of age. There are currently 13 staff employed to work with the children. Of these, 10 hold appropriate early years qualifications and one member of staff is studying for a

p.5

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.5

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Setting details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion