Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Knowsley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Hilary Boyd
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY303575
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Weak hygiene procedures mean that procedures, such as handwashing, lack rigour in minimising a potential health risk. p.4
- This contributes to weaknesses in ensuring teaching is adapted to match children's individual needs. p.1
- The childminder's procedures for evaluating the quality of her practice are weak. p.1
- Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. p.4
- There are a number of weaknesses that impact on children's safety, well-being and personal development. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that potential risks are identified, removed or minimised and children's safety is promoted 08/04/2016 p.2
- ensure developmentally appropriate strategies are used when promoting children's behaviour 29/04/2016 p.2
- ensure information gathered from observations on children are used to plan individual and appropriate next steps to support their development towards the early learning goals 29/04/2016 p.2
- implement appropriate hygiene procedures that improve children's awareness and understanding of healthy practice p.3
- evaluate sleeping arrangements to consider the individual needs of children p.3
- develop the systems for self-evaluation and identify accurate priorities for potential improvement that raise the quality of practice. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding3
“Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 798
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 18 March 2016 29 March 2012
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder has not undertaken measures to identify and reduce potential hazards to children, including the implementation of rigorous hygiene and sleeping procedures. The childminder does not implement developmentally appropriate strategies to ensure children's behaviour is effectively managed. This impacts on children's opportunities to maintain interest in some play experiences and this limits their potential learning. The childminder does not effectively observe children's skills and abilities, in order to plan purposeful next steps to support their learning. This contributes to weaknesses in ensuring teaching is adapted to match children's individual needs. The childminder's procedures for evaluating the quality of her practice are weak. This contributes towards to her lack of knowledge of how to raise the quality of the provision and outcomes for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children move freely around the environment as they predominately lead their own learning. They are developing positive relationships with the childminder and this helps children to develop a sense of belonging. The childminder organises resources that generally stimulate children's interest and help them to make independent choices in their play. The childminder has reasonable partnerships with parents and she shares information about the children's day in different ways.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that potential risks are identified, removed or minimised and children's safety is promoted 08/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure developmentally appropriate strategies are used when promoting children's behaviour 29/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure information gathered from observations on children are used to plan individual and appropriate next steps to support their development towards the early learning goals 29/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching in order to support children to make progress in their learning. 29/04/2016 To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
implement appropriate hygiene procedures that improve children's awareness and understanding of healthy practice evaluate sleeping arrangements to consider the individual needs of children develop the systems for self-evaluation and identify accurate priorities for potential improvement that raise the quality of practice.
p.3
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint observation with the childminder. The inspector held discussions with the childminder and interacted with children at appropriate times during the inspection. She discussed children's learning and sampled children's records. The inspector looked at and discussed relevant documentation, such as, the risk assessments, safeguarding procedure and checked evidence of the qualifications and suitability of all adults living on the premises. The inspector took account of parents' views obtained prior to the inspection.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. Some of the safeguarding and welfare requirements are not being met. This is due to the lack of the childminder's understanding and ability to demonstrate how potential risks are effectively managed. She has not given consideration to identify hazards within the indoor environment and ensure that these are removed or minimised. The childminder ensures that mandatory training is undertaken. This contributes to her understanding of the procedures to follow should child protection concerns arise. She also maintains her first-aid qualification. However, procedures for evaluating the quality of her practice are not yet good enough. The qualified childminder monitors children's ongoing progress. However, she does not accurately evaluate the quality of teaching to ensure she adapts her approach to meet children's individual needs.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder does not place sufficient emphasis on observing children at play, in order to fully assess their unique needs. This means that she does not plan appropriate experiences to ensure children make adequate progress. For example, during story time, children quickly lose interest and motivation in stories that are not developmentally stimulating. The childminder uses mathematical language to help raise children's early awareness of some aspects of mathematics. Parents are encouraged to share detailed information about their children's existing skills to inform their initial on-entry assessment. Annual assessments are now used to inform parents about their children's progress within the prime areas of learning. Written comments from parents state that they are happy with the care and service provided.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
There are a number of weaknesses that impact on children's safety, well-being and personal development. Children's behaviour is not managed effectively. This impacts on their ability to engage in activities and hinders their potential learning. For example, play is often disrupted as the childminder attempts to implement developmentally inappropriate strategies. The childminder is not vigilant in ensuring children's safety is promoted. This means they do not fully understand how to keep themselves safe. For example, children access objects that potentially compromise their safety. Weak hygiene procedures mean that procedures, such as handwashing, lack rigour in minimising a potential health risk. Furthermore, the childminder has not fully considered ways to promote children's individual sleeping arrangements. Children are physically active and are developing some skills as they move and negotiate around the space provided. Younger children enjoy
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
touching and exploring resources that interest them. Children have some opportunities to access experiences that promote their understanding of the wider community.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children are not actively encouraged to make satisfactory progress towards the early learning goals. Their personal, social, emotional development and their communication and language skills are not given priority. This impacts on their ability to acquire the range of skills they need for the next stage in their learning, such as starting school.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY303575 Local authority Knowsley Inspection number 861813 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 10 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 9
p.5
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection 29 March 2012
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2005. She operates all year round from 7am to 7pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds a recognised childcare qualification at level 3.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion