Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Bramfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 13 Oct 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wendy Varney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Oct 2015

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Wendy Varney

  • Postcode verified

    IP19 9HZ

  • Name on report verified

    Bramfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyimprovedclearimprovingeffectivelypositivesuccessfulstrengths
Criticismnot metweaknessesweaker

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings110w0
  • Leadership644w+23
  • What needs to improve388w+77

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,142
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 47
Average sentence
28 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%Leadership 55%What needs to improve 33%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Lee Regan Executive Headteacher Bramfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Bridge Street Bramfield Halesworth Suffolk IP19 9HZ

p.1

Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 13 October 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

Voluntary Controlled Primary School

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses following the section 5 inspection which took place in January 2015. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of

This letter and the monitoring inspection report will be published on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the chair of the interim executive board, the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk County Council and the Diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich.

p.1

place in January 2015

 Improve teaching and, hence, achievement by: – ensuring that all pupils, including those in mixed year-groups, are taught at a level that consistently challenges them – paying particular attention to the challenge given to the most able – improving planning, marking and written work so that standards are consistently high – tackling the teaching and learning of mathematics in those year groups and areas where progress in this subject is weaker – ensuring that teaching assistants are deployed effectively – devising a lesson observation system that monitors rigorously the quality of pupils’ learning, and whether groups of pupils are being sufficiently stretched.

p.2

place in January 2015

 Improve leadership by: – ensuring that self-evaluations are rigorously self-critical and lead to purposeful, clear action plans, the outcomes of which are closely monitored – making sure that governors are regularly supplied with clear summaries of the school’s performance, including that of groups, and that these summaries consistently reference this performance to national expectations – ensuring that the coordinator for special educational needs has appropriate resources to develop materials for the delivery of mathematics to disabled pupils and those with special educational needs.

p.2

place in January 2015

 Improve governance by: – ensuring that governors are urgently trained in the analysis of school performance data, and that they understand which aspects of these data are most important for their analysis of school performance – setting challenging school performance targets and monitoring progress towards them rigorously and frequently – ensuring that these targets and timescales are recorded in such a way that they can be easily checked, and that governors hold the school and senior leaders to account if they are not met.

p.2

Evidence

The inspector met with the interim executive headteacher, the head of school, a group of pupils, two members of the interim executive board (IEB) and a representative of the local authority. The purpose of the inspection was to review the school’s action plan as this was not fit for purpose at the first monitoring inspection.

p.3

Context

The substantive executive headteacher retired at the end of the summer term. An interim executive headteacher has been appointed for this academic year. The head of school has been made substantive in her post. A teaching and learning lead has been appointed for two terms to work across all four schools in the federation. The governing body was disbanded at the end of the summer term and an IEB has been in place since July 2015.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The quality of leadership and management at the school has improved since the last monitoring inspection. The interim executive headteacher has made a prompt start to addressing the school’s weaknesses since he joined the federation in September. For example, he has employed a teaching and learning lead to work with individual teachers and provide coaching based on their specific needs.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Pupils expressed very positive opinions about the new interim executive headteacher. They discussed with the inspector the reasons why they are no longer allowed to call teaching assistants by their first name; pupils understood that salutations such as ‘Mr’ and ‘Mrs’ are a sign of respect and agreed with the interim executive headteacher’s decision that this should be extended to all members of staff, not just teachers.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The IEB has met twice since it was formed in July. The members of the IEB have a wide range of experience of school governance, including successful tenures as chairs of governing bodies, members of school improvement boards and members of other IEBs. It is too soon to judge the effectiveness of the IEB in ensuring prompt improvement and in holding the school’s leaders to account.

p.3

Strengths in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:

 The school’s action planning has improved since the first monitoring inspection. The strategic development plan provides a clear vision for the federation as a whole, with the strapline ‘keeping education at the heart of village life’ becoming increasingly familiar in and around the school.  The school’s action plan has been thoroughly overhauled since the first monitoring inspection and is now fit for purpose. It includes measurable success criteria, clear monitoring activity, and specific and appropriate actions. The plan has been reviewed and updated.  The increased emphasis on working as a federation of schools is also improving the quality of leadership at Bramfield. For example, the mathematics leader’s responsibility for the subject across the federation has enabled her to have a greater impact at Bramfield. Together with the rest of the federation, the school has adopted a ‘mastery’ approach to teaching the

p.3

Strengths in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:

subject and this is beginning to ensure that pupils are challenged fully by the work that they are given to do.  There is now a much greater emphasis on improving the quality of teaching in the school. The school’s records show that monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning is now more frequent, including observations of individual lessons and ‘learning walks’ throughout the school. This monitoring activity is used to provide staff with specific ways that their teaching can be improved.  A number of strengths in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment were evident during this monitoring inspection. Pupils showed very good attitudes to learning in the lessons seen. For example, in a Year 5/6 science lesson, pupils showed great interest in their investigation and persevered for an extended period of time, because the teacher’s explanations were clear and the task was interesting.

p.4

Weaknesses in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:

 Although the school’s self-evaluation is now more thorough and more self- critical, there remains room for improvement. It is important that the school judges itself against the descriptors in Ofsted’s current School inspection handbook (August 2015) rather than those from the previous inspection framework.

p.4

External support

The local authority supports the school well, for example by helping the school’s leaders to write a more rigorous action plan. The local authority appointed an IEB to strengthen the governance of the school. Local authority advisers continue to provide training and support to the school, and to the federation, as required.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion