Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nick Whittaker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nick Whittaker

  • Postcode verified

    DN4 4ND

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveaccuratestrengthspoliterespectfulconfidentlypositive
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaystoo fewerrors

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
792
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr John Innes Headteacher Balby Carr Community Academy Weston Road Balby Doncaster South Yorkshire DN4 4ND

p.1

Community Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 12 October 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Community Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Community Academy

Senior leaders and the governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of Wakefield City Academies Trust (WCAT) to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I scrutinised academy documents and evaluated the academy’s improvement plan. I visited classes with you and other leaders, had discussions with students and examined the work in their books and folders. Ofsted

p.1

Evidence

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Context

The Chair of the Governing Body has been appointed since the section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher and senior leaders are taking swift and purposeful action to tackle the weaknesses identified at the last section 5 inspection. Leaders have an accurate view of the academy’s strengths and weaknesses and know what needs to be done to move the academy to good.

p.2

Main findings

Students’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning are improving. The academy is more orderly and students are more polite and respectful to adults. Students respond more confidently to teachers’ questioning and their books and folders show a growing pride in their work.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have a more secure view of the attainment and progress of students because teachers’ assessments are more accurate, and senior and middle leaders are routinely checking that they are correct. However, teachers do not always make good use of this information and, as a result, the work set for some students is still too hard or too easy. Leaders are only just beginning to use assessment information to identify when students are underachieving and, in a more timely way, provide the extra help students need to get back on track.

p.2

Main findings

Higher-quality marking in books and folders is helping students to identify and correct errors and misconceptions in their work. However, students do not always develop and deepen their knowledge and understanding well enough because they have too few opportunities to use and apply what they are learning, for example by solving problems or tackling exam-style questions.

p.2

Main findings

The academy’s improvement plan is closely linked to the areas for improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. However, it does not focus sharply enough on how key groups of students, especially disadvantaged students, will make faster progress. The plan does not have specific and measurable enough targets for these students or describe how and when the academy’s actions will be monitored and reviewed.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body is already better informed about important areas of the academy’s work. Governors are unafraid to challenge when improvement is not swift enough. The Chair of the Governing Body recognises the need for a sharper focus on the progress of disadvantaged students and is keeping a close eye on how effectively leaders are acting on the recommendations from the academy’s external review of the use of pupil premium. Further action should be taken to strengthen the academy’s improvement plan so that the plan:

p.2

Main findings

 clearly identifies how the progress of key groups of students, especially disadvantaged students, will be accelerated  includes more specific and measurable targets for different groups of students  sets out how and when leaders will check whether their actions are making the necessary difference.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Wakefield City Academies Trust has added much to the academy’s drive for improvement. The headteacher and senior leaders are rigorously held to account by colleagues from WCAT who are systematically checking important areas of the academy’s performance. Support is being effectively targeted and is starting to have a positive impact on students’ attitudes to learning and the quality of teaching.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Doncaster, the Secretary of State and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion