Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Nov 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jayne Ashman

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jayne Ashman

  • Postcode verified

    LE16 7JG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityextremelyeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedrobustclearimproving
Criticismmissedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,097
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Sue Jones The Robert Smyth Academy Burnmill Road Market Harborough Leicestershire LE16 7JG

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 5 October 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection, the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, senior leaders and representatives of the governing body. The academy improvement planning was evaluated and you shared with me information regarding students’ achievement. I spoke with a group of Year 11 students and a group of Year 12 students. Information about performance management and the ways in which leaders are monitoring the quality of teaching were discussed at length. Ofsted

p.1

Evidence

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection in March 2015, there have been significant changes to staffing, including changes at middle leadership level.

p.2

Main findings

Planning is in place to ensure that the issues raised during the last inspection are addressed effectively in order for the school to become good. The academy’s information about students’ achievement in 2015 indicates that the progress of disadvantaged students has improved. Additionally, more students are making the expected progress within English. You are aware that challenges remain regarding the performance of higher ability students, particularly those predicted to achieve A* grades. Challenges also remain regarding the performance of disabled students and those who have special educational needs. We discussed the plans you have in place to ensure these students make the progress they should, including the support of a specialist leader of education (SLE) to work alongside the academy’s special educational needs coordinator (SENCo).

p.2

Main findings

The way in which achievement information is understood by leaders is improving. A new information system has been implemented, and you said that there is now more clarity, leading to increased expectations as to what students should achieve. We discussed the urgency of ensuring that teachers could easily understand and access this information so that planning for learning is more precisely focused. The Year 11 students I spoke with said that, in some of their lessons, they did not feel they were challenged as much as they could be. School information still suggests that some students could make better progress.

p.2

Main findings

The system for managing teachers’ performance is now more robust. You have implemented the ‘Teacher on a Page’ strategy and have ensured that individual teacher targets reflect the priorities identified within the school development planning. For example, each teacher now has an individual target with a focus on students’ progress. You feel that line managers are now more able to hold teachers to account. Additionally, you have planned a programme of universal professional development linked to whole-school priorities. Support and training is also available for individual staff in order that their practice rapidly improves.

p.2

Main findings

The way in which the quality of teaching is monitored is now more closely focused on the progress that all students make over time. You have worked with external partners to calibrate the professional understanding of leaders about how to judge the quality of teaching and learning. You are involved in the Thomas Estley Learning Academy (TELA) peer challenge programme and feel that this has provided further opportunities to receive high-quality support and challenge. The governing body knows that it has a role in holding leaders to account. Governors are right to ask: ‘How do we know that the teaching is good and that all students make expected progress?’ They agree that they must have an accurate way in which they can hold leaders to account. The Vice-chair of the Governing Body is aware of the urgency of this.

p.2

Main findings

There have been many changes to staffing and this includes at middle leader level. You are mindful that there needs to be consistency across all subject areas and are making sure that leaders receive professional development and guidance. There are more regular meetings to discuss students’ progress, and heads of faculty have been released from form tutor responsibilities in order to focus on specific student intervention work. You have large senior and middle leadership teams. You also have members of the teaching staff who have additional responsibilities. We discussed the need to ensure that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined and that clear lines of accountability are in place. This is particularly the case in the leadership of the progress of disadvantaged students.

p.3

Main findings

You have implemented PURE (Punctual, Uniform, Ready, Engaged) as a strategy to ensure that students arrive to lessons promptly, prepared and with the correct attitude to learning. Leaders conduct ‘climate walks’ and you have evidence to suggest that there are improvements in the expectations set for students. However, when asked, students indicated that their learning was often disturbed by the behaviour of others, particularly in the lower and middle-setted lessons. We spoke at length about the urgency of ensuring that appropriate learning behaviours were evident in all lessons.

p.3

Main findings

There are many opportunities for students to engage in the life of the academy. Students said that they appreciated the relationships built with staff, and the care and support they receive. Opportunities are being missed to regularly involve students in informing leaders of what learning looks like for them. Those students I spoke with were extremely perceptive and had much to say.

p.3

Main findings

Governors are highly committed to the academy. The Vice-chair of Governors provides particularly good support. There is an urgency to make sure that there are systems in place to further challenge leaders. Governors need to be absolutely clear that actions planned by leaders are having the impact they should have, and that evidence is provided to support this.

p.3

External support

The academy values its work with external partners, including Learning South Leicestershire and the Thomas Estley Learning Academy (TELA). You have appointed a school improvement partner to provide additional challenge and support. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Leicestershire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion