Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Hampshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Mar 2016
- Inspectors verified
Loraine Wardlaw
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY417681
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At times, the childminder leaves her assistants, who do not all have valid paediatric first-aid certificates, in sole charge of children. p.1
- The impact on children's safety is limited as the assistants have some understanding of how to treat children in the event of an emergency. p.1
- The associated requirements of the Childcare Register are not met. p.1
- The quality of teaching is inconsistent. p.1
- When interacting with children, the childminder and her assistants do not always offer the right amount of challenge or support to fully extend their learning. p.1
- The childminder does not monitor her assistants' practice and put in place coaching to improve the quality of teaching. p.1
- Children do not make the best possible progress. p.1
- The childminder does not have a clear understanding of observation, assessment and planning. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment10
“The quality of teaching is inconsistent.” p.1Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 728
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 7 March 2016 27 April 2011
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
At times, the childminder leaves her assistants, who do not all have valid paediatric first-aid certificates, in sole charge of children. The impact on children's safety is limited as the assistants have some understanding of how to treat children in the event of an emergency. The associated requirements of the Childcare Register are not met. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. When interacting with children, the childminder and her assistants do not always offer the right amount of challenge or support to fully extend their learning. The childminder does not monitor her assistants' practice and put in place coaching to improve the quality of teaching. Children do not make the best possible progress. The childminder does not have a clear understanding of observation, assessment and planning. Activities do not always match children's individual learning needs. The childminder's self-evaluation methods are not robust to ensure areas for
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
development are accurately identified and addressed, to bring about consistent improvement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are settled and happy in their play activities. They develop strong relationships with the childminder and her assistants. The childminder places a good emphasis on partnership with parents. She communicates with them effectively to promote continuity in their children's care. The childminder provides children with fun experiences in the community, which they very much enjoy, for example, a trip with their parents to see a pantomime.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure assistants left in sole charge of children have a valid paediatric first-aid qualification 08/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
develop effective observation, assessment and planning systems to plan activities that meet children's individual needs and provide them with challenge, to help them make the best possible progress 08/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve how assistants receive coaching to improve their personal effectiveness and the quality of their teaching. 08/04/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
strengthen self-evaluation to identify and address areas for improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed children's play activities and the childminder's interactions with them. The inspector undertook a joint observation with the childminder. The inspector held discussions with the childminder about the children and looked at their learning records. The inspector sampled some safeguarding and leadership documentation. The inspector looked at written feedback from parents.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The childminder does not meet all the legal requirements, although this does not have a significant impact on the outcomes for children. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has a secure understanding of the child protection procedure to take if she was worried about a child. Although the childminder has failed to ensure that her assistants are first- aid qualified, they do know how to act in a first-aid emergency. The childminder reflects on her work. However, she does not evaluate her service well enough to identify and target weaknesses. She does not monitor the quality of her own and her assistants' teaching and offer coaching and support to make improvements. The childminder suitably monitors children's progress but her system is not robust to help her target teaching precisely. A partnership with other settings and professionals exists, which provides children with continuity of care and learning.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Children show enjoyment and motivation during some of their play and adult-led activities. For example, they enjoy exploring playdough with their fingers and play a ball game with the childminder. The childminder promotes colour recognition and counting. However, overall the quality of the childminder's and her assistants' teaching skills and tailored interaction is variable; there is sometimes an absence of challenge and extension. Children have opportunities to learn songs and rhymes and enjoy looking at books. However, the childminder has an insecure knowledge of observation, assessment and planning, to consistently build on what each child knows and can do.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
The childminder shows children warmth and sympathetic care to help them feel happy, and secure. However, the weaknesses in leadership and management do not fully promote children's safety. The childminder understands about equality and provides children with plenty of attention and supervision by her high staff to child ratios. Children behave well. They receive guidance on behaviour boundaries and positive praise from the childminder such as when tidying up resources. The childminder promotes children's health. She provides active play outdoors and suitable snacks and meals to meet children's dietary needs. Young children's sleep time routines are adhered to which promotes growth and development.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children settle quickly and develop confidence, for example, through the adult support they receive. Children make sound developmental progress from their starting points. They learn suitable skills to prepare them for the future, such as school. On occasions, however, the teaching and resources do not match children's needs.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY417681 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 832452 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection 27 April 2011
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2010. She lives in Gosport, Hampshire. The childminder employs four assistants to work with her and the children. The childminder is open all year round, Monday to Friday. The childminder has a recognised childcare qualification at level 3.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion