Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care interim inspection

Children's home run by Blue Mountain Homes Ltd in Ealing

Inspected 8 Mar 2016 · URN SC414516

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Caroline Brailsford

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Mar 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Caroline Brailsford

  • Postcode verified

    W13 9HB

  • URN verified

    SC414516

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositivepositivelymake good progressstrongeffectivewell supportedimproved
Criticismdeclinedat riskconcernsmissedharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings860w+41
  • What needs to improve382w−73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,236
longer than usual (typical 904)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 23%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged good at the full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has declined in effectiveness .

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home has been judged to have declined in effectiveness because, at the full inspection in November 2015, all young people were progressing well in education; but this is not currently the case. One young person has been at the home for almost 6 weeks and there are no plans in place to ensure that they can access a suitable school placement. There are no personal education plans for staff to refer to. Information from previous schools, such as termly reports, is also unavailable. One young person said, ‘they don’t know how I did in education before’. Consequently, staff are unaware of the young person’s previous achievements or targets. Whilst the young person is receiving some personal tutoring, this is minimal. The manager has not made contact with the local authority virtual head teacher to demonstrate a pro-active approach to this young person’s education. Any drift or interruption to learning is of utmost importance because the young

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

person should be embarking on their final exam courses this year. If this is not put right quickly it could affect their future life chances. At the last inspection, there were no shortfalls in the management response to safeguarding issues. Since then, where concerns have been raised about the conduct of a staff member, the manager could not evidence how he had assessed potential risks to young people. However, he did ensure that the matter was referred to the appropriate person in the local authority and to Ofsted. This enabled prompt investigation. Young people’s risk assessments are basic and do not cover all of their specific safeguarding issues. For example, risks relating to sexual exploitation and gangs are not evaluated in one young person’s risk assessment. There is the potential for important safeguarding information to be missed by staff when deciding on their action to keep a young person safe.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

Where young people go missing, this is managed well. Staff find out quickly because of a high level of staff supervision. They look for young people and contact the police and other relevant professionals. One young person reflected on a period of when he was missing from care and said, ‘staff did phone me and persuaded me to come back’. However, where a young person’s episodes of missing have led to a multi-agency risk management meeting, the manager is unaware of all the recommendations from the meeting. Therefore, it cannot be ascertained if the recommendations have been effectively carried out. There have been improvements. The home has met the two requirements and three recommendations set at the last inspection. These improvements have had a positive impact on young people. Missing from care return interviews are now carried out to promote opportunities to further safeguard them. All notifications

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

have been made to Ofsted in accordance with the regulations. Also, there have been improvements to the arrangements for the recording and administration of medicines. Other records, such as the daily log and the restraint log are also better. They enable more effective monitoring of staff practice and conduct. Other improvements include a new format for young people’s meetings, so that they can have more of a say in the running of the home. Young people now all have memory boxes and staff help them to collect memorabilia and photographs of good times. Staff help them to keep mementos of their achievements. When young people transition to a new placement, they take this box with them so that they will be able to reflect positively on thier time at the home. One social worker has commented very positively on how a young person was assisted by staff to transition to their new placement. In addition, young people say that they were

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

made to feel very welcome when they arrived at the home. Young people say they like living at this home and generally feel that this is a place of safety, where they can make good progress. One young person commented on the staff saying ‘they are sound’. There are very positive relationships between staff and young people. Staff use their skills well to promote and develop these relationships. They know that if there are good relationships, young people are more likely to accept support with their problems and worries. Support is particularly good in relation to helping young people to recognise and manage their issues of safety. Recently young people have been well supported through complex relationships with others and after their periods of missing from care. There is strong multi-agency working in some areas. For example, where a young person has been obliged to undertake work with the youth offending team, staff

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

have complimented the case worker’s efforts to ensure that the young person engages well and makes progress. The manager is committed to providing a good level of care. He is well liked by staff and young people. Both he and an independent visitor complete regular monitoring of the home. There are examples where this works effectively and the manager responds quickly to any recommendations made, demonstrating his commitment to improvement.

p.3

Information about this children's home

The home is privately owned and registered to provide care to three young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.4

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.4

Recent inspection history

24/02/2015 Interim Sustained effectiveness

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.5

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the education standard, the registered person must:

p.5

Requirement Due date

(1) Ensure that children make measurable progress towards achieving their education potential and are helped to do so. 31 March 2016

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendations:  ensure that staff have the skills and knowledge to understand each child's education and training targets or next steps for learning. If a child's progress is not in line with their agreed targets or next steps, staff should seek expert advice from education professionals, such as the Virtual Head, SENCO, learning mentor or teacher. Staff must challenge the child's education provider if the child does not receive sufficient support to progress as outlined in their relevant plans. (The Guide to the Children's Homes Quality Standards, page 28, paragraph 5.11)

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure that where there has been a review after a child has become missing from placement, the review should result in the development of a strategy to minimise a repeat of the missing episode. This in particular relation to ensuring that recommendations stemming from the review are made understood by staff and managers. (Statuary Guidance on children who run away or go missing from home or care, page 20, paragraph 55)

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure that the recruitment, supervision and performance management of staff safeguards children and minimises potential risks to them. (The Guide to the Children's Homes Quality Standards, page 61, paragraph 13.1)

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure staff have the knowledge and skills to recognise and be alert for any signs that might indicate that a child is in any way at risk of harm. This is in particular relation to young people’s risk assessments. (The Guide to the Children's Homes Quality Standards, page 43, paragraph 9.12)

p.5

What the inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.7

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.8

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.8

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.8

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion