Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Mar 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Moss

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Moss

  • Postcode verified

    DE45 1JH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingconsistentlysecure
Criticismbelowyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mrs Sharon Slack Headteacher Monyash CofE Primary School Church Street Monyash Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1JH

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 2 March 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help that you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection, in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and with a representative of the local authority. I had a discussion by telephone with the Chair of the Governing Body. We visited all classrooms briefly. I looked at safeguarding records, the latest data available on the pupils’ achievement, and evaluated the latest version of the school improvement plan.

p.1

Context

You have joined the school as the new headteacher since the previous monitoring visit. Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Main findings

The reason for carrying out this second monitoring visit and thus the focus of the activities during the visit was that, at the time of the first monitoring visit, the long- term arrangements for the leadership of the school were uncertain, which was potentially a barrier to the school’s improvement. Also, a planned review of governance had not taken place.

p.2

Main findings

After the first monitoring visit, the local authority tackled the uncertainty around the leadership of the school in the immediate term. You took responsibility as the new headteacher for the school not long after the first monitoring visit. Also, the local authority initiated a sensible and carefully considered process for making more- secure arrangements for the longer term. That process is still continuing, which means that, at the time of this second monitoring visit, the long-term arrangements for the leadership of the school have not been secured and that continues potentially to be a barrier to the school’s improvement as it approaches a full reinspection. The uncertainty needs to be resolved as soon as possible.

p.2

Main findings

Nevertheless, the transfer of responsibility from the former executive headteacher to your was managed effectively and went smoothly. As a result, you have been able to build upon the work initiated by the former executive headteacher. You have, correctly, continued to make the quality of teaching and assessment the main priorities for improving the school. Those priorities are reflected in the latest version of your school improvement plan, so that it is now a more effective tool for improving the school.

p.2

Main findings

Accordingly, there have been further developments in the quality of teaching and assessment. You have used a combination of professional development and training, better and more-varied monitoring of the work of the school, performance management discussions and targeted externally provided support for teaching effectively. The combination has enabled you to establish approaches to teaching and assessment focused more consistently on the pupils’ learning needs. Improvements in the pupils’ achievement are evident in the early years.

p.2

Main findings

Nevertheless, some challenges remain. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics (letters and the sounds that they make) check fell to below average in 2015. The proportions of pupils making expected progress in English, mathematics, and science in Key Stage 2 were below average. Those proportions are affected significantly, however, by the very small numbers of pupils in the year groups.

p.2

Main findings

The review of governance has now been completed and the governing body is acting on the findings and recommendations. The governing body is now better organised and approaches its work more purposefully. It is more focused on the progress of the pupils and more alert to the achievement of different groups of pupils, such as those eligible for the pupil premium and the most able.

p.2

Main findings

The activities initiated at the time of the previous monitoring visit to enable the governing body to obtain a view of the work of the school at first hand have meant that it is now better informed. It is more capable, as a result, of asking pertinent questions of school leaders about the progress of the pupils, which it is doing. The full impact of this in terms of influencing the pace of developments at the school and on the progress of the pupils has yet to be seen. The governing body continues to be hampered by difficulties in recruiting members.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has, sensibly, sustained the higher-than-usual level of support for the school which was evident at the previous monitoring visit. The school’s progress and the level of support are being kept properly under review. The support provided for improvements in the quality of teaching is being used effectively by the school and augmented by a useful partnership with another school, as part of the professional development to which I have referred already. The result is a coherent programme of staff development for Monyash. The local authority has planned bespoke training for the governing body, to assist with its further development.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire, the Regional Schools Commissioner and the Director of Education for the Diocese of Derby.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion