Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Pearson PLC

Inspected — · URN 57951

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    CM20 2JE

  • Name on report verified

    Pearson PLC

  • URN verified

    57951

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−39Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseclearrapid progresssaferigorousaccuratetimelyprecisesecure
Criticismconcernsat riskinadequatenot yetpoorgapsyet tonot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings352w−60
  • What needs to improve988w−28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,327
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%What needs to improve 74%

Full report text

Name of lead inspector: Paula Heaney HMI

p.1

Last day of inspection: 18 February 2016

p.1

Address: Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE

p.1

Publication date: 8 March 2016 Inspection number: 10017461 Monitoring visit: Pearson PLC, 18 February 2016

p.1

Context and focus of visit

This is the first re-inspection monitoring visit to Pearson PLC following the inspection which took place between 8–10 December 2015 and publication of the inspection report on 27 January 2016. The provider’s overall effectiveness was judged to be inadequate.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

At the time of the monitoring visit, 21 apprentices were on business administration, customer service, team leading and contact centre frameworks, with two apprentices taking a break from learning.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

While first steps are normally reported on following a first monitoring visit, a progress judgement for the safeguarding theme has been made on this occasion.

p.2

Reasonable progress

At the inspection in December, health and safety procedures for Pearson employees in general were in place, but leaders and managers had not ensured that these extended to safeguarding apprentices. Leaders and managers have taken appropriate action since the inspection to ensure that apprentices are safe and that staff are aware of their responsibilities. The new policy usefully covers students, children and vulnerable adults to ensure a duty of care towards all learners in the company.

p.2

Reasonable progress

A designated management lead is now in place for apprenticeship safeguarding, mentored by the organisation’s corporate lead in safeguarding. This has been communicated to key staff and apprentices through recent inductions, so that they are clear who to contact to report concerns. Training for staff, to be completed by the end of February, is underway so that they better understand their roles and responsibilities with regard to safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. Clear processes for staff to report concerns, related to levels of risk, have been established.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Plans for assessors to develop apprentices’ knowledge and understanding of safeguarding, the ‘Prevent’ duty and British values in their four-weekly reviews, through probing questions, are in place, but it is too soon to measure the impact. Line managers and apprentices have ready access to policies and procedures via the new apprenticeship webpage: ‘NEO’. Monitoring visit: Pearson PLC, 18 February 2016

p.2

Priorities for improvement

 Gather feedback from apprentices on how safe they feel and take action to address any concerns raised.  Consider the impact of reviews of organisational policy on apprentices routinely.  Complete the ‘at risk flowchart’ so that line managers, coaches and assessors have clear guidance on the interventions they should take regarding concerns relating to safeguarding, the ‘Prevent’ duty and/or British values as part of your approach to managing risk.

p.3

components of the apprenticeship framework are in place

The transition of apprentices from the previous subcontractor to Pearson TQ, a sister company that delivers training, has been completed. A rigorous and thorough analysis of the apprentices remaining in learning has provided leaders, managers and staff with a much more accurate picture of apprentices’ starting points, their progress to date and their performance by key groups, such as ethnicity, gender and location.

p.3

components of the apprenticeship framework are in place

A monthly steering group has been established, the Pearson Apprenticeship Advisory Group (PAAG), attended by a senior leader in the organisation, to monitor contract performance and apprentices’ progress and support needs. Leaders and managers have a clear understanding of what needs to be done to improve the provision. While a detailed action plan is in place, with some actions already completed, it is not yet possible to gauge overall success or progress due to the significant number of individual actions.

p.3

components of the apprenticeship framework are in place

A monthly data dashboard captures and reports performance to enable leaders, managers and staff to review progress and identify issues fully. For example, managers have identified poor performance of apprentices in the customer contact centre in Manchester. Consequently, assessor capacity has been increased in this location. Managers interview all apprentices at risk of leaving to encourage them to stay in learning. English, mathematics and information technology progress and achievement are not currently included in the monthly review.

p.3

components of the apprenticeship framework are in place

Arrangements to meet apprenticeship requirements, with prioritisation of English and mathematics and sufficient off-the-job learning to complement their skills, are being implemented, although it is too early to measure their impact.

p.3

Priorities for improvement

 Review progress and success in functional skills in management reviews to identify potential areas of risk and actions required.  Refine the action plan to include top-level key performance measures to provide a clearer analysis of success.  Implement and monitor the effectiveness of arrangements for off-the-job learning and English and mathematics across the provision locations. Monitoring visit: Pearson PLC, 18 February 2016  Consider how to capture information on apprentices who succeed well, building on the current award system for both managers and apprentices who exceed their targets.

p.3

apprentices’ English and mathematics skills

Line managers have undergone training and have a clearer understanding of their role in supporting apprentices in their framework achievement and skill development. Standardisation meetings are taking place every two months to review how well functional skills are being developed through apprentices’ job roles, and best teaching and coaching practice. Managers are in the process of analysing assessors’ skills, including their levels of English and mathematics, so that bespoke training can be arranged.

p.4

apprentices’ English and mathematics skills

Assessors’ four-weekly reviews of apprentices’ progress now include their line managers routinely. Contract managers plan to conduct joint observations of assessors and coaches to assess standards and identify training needs.

p.4

apprentices’ English and mathematics skills

While arrangements are in place to improve teaching, learning and assessment, it is too early to measure their impact.

p.4

Priorities for improvement

 Managers to undertake joint observations of teachers, coaches and assessors so they are clear about what needs to be done to improve their performance and improve apprentices’ progress.  Teachers, coaches and assessors to undertake timely training so they can better support apprentices to make more rapid progress.

p.4

Improving apprentices’ progress and skill development

A thorough review of apprentices’ skills levels has been carried out to identify skills gaps and key priorities for training. Outcomes from this analysis are used in two- weekly functional skills workshops, although these have yet to start in the Manchester location. Line managers are now routinely part of the review process, to better support specific skills development and assessment.

p.4

Improving apprentices’ progress and skill development

Managers recognise that more work needs to be done to develop apprentices’ skills beyond those required of the framework. They are considering using work-based projects to stretch and challenge apprentices and develop learning through the ‘NEO’ webpage, although work is at an early stage.

p.4

Improving apprentices’ progress and skill development

Apprentices’ and assessors’ review documentation is being developed to include more meaningful targets for apprentices to complete between review periods.

p.4

Improving apprentices’ progress and skill development

Managers are not yet clear of apprentices’ destinations when they complete their framework. Monitoring visit: Pearson PLC, 18 February 2016

p.4

Priorities for improvement

 Focus on the quality of target-setting for apprentices to ensure targets are precise and meaningful for them in their work roles and involve their line managers fully.  Ensure the destinations of apprentices completing their framework are captured and monitored, to inform future planning.  Implement ways in which apprentices can develop their personal learning and thinking skills and so extend their current skills and knowledge. Monitoring visit: Pearson PLC, 18 February 2016 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after

p.5

Priorities for improvement

children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn . Ofsted

p.6

Priorities for improvement

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion