Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Kensington and Chelsea
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Feb 2016
- Inspectors verified
Jennifer Devine
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
105782
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder is not fully secure in her knowledge and understanding of the requirements of her role. p.1
- She is unaware of the need to undertake the children's progress check when they are aged between two and three years. p.1
- The childminder does not make initial assessments of what children know when they join her to monitor their progress well. p.1
- The childminder does not plan her environment sufficiently well to ensure that activities that interest children are readily available, particularly for the younger children. p.1
- The childminder has not established a programme of professional development sufficiently well to ensure that she keeps up to date and maintains her previous good quality of teaching. p.1
- The childminder does not always make the most of opportunities to encourage children's early mathematical language. p.1
- The childminder knows the children well and makes sure that they are very settled and emotionally secure in her home. p.1
- The childminder meets children's physical needs through a suitable partnership with parents. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 719
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 16 February 2016 8 February 2010
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The childminder is not fully secure in her knowledge and understanding of the requirements of her role. She is unaware of the need to undertake the children's progress check when they are aged between two and three years. The childminder does not make initial assessments of what children know when they join her to monitor their progress well. The childminder does not plan her environment sufficiently well to ensure that activities that interest children are readily available, particularly for the younger children. The childminder has not established a programme of professional development sufficiently well to ensure that she keeps up to date and maintains her previous good quality of teaching. The childminder does not always make the most of opportunities to encourage children's early mathematical language.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder knows the children well and makes sure that they are very settled and emotionally secure in her home. The childminder meets children's physical needs through a suitable partnership with parents. She has a good understanding of the importance of promoting children's good health. For example, children enjoy nutritious, home-cooked foods.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
develop knowledge and understanding of undertaking the progress check for each child when aged between two and three years, and of providing parents with a short written report of that progress 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
develop a secure and consistent process of ongoing assessment from when the children start 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that an interesting range of toys and resources, that suit children of different ages and abilities, is readily available to them. 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
extend children's early mathematical understanding and skills improve current self-evaluation processes so that they accurately assess the strengths and weaknesses of the provision and identify where teaching needs improving to be of a consistently good quality, with all requirements met.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the childminder and the children. A short joint observation was completed with the childminder The inspector spoke with the childminder at appropriate times throughout the inspection, regarding her practice and the arrangements for observation, assessment and planning. The inspector checked the documentation the childminder uses to support her practices.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The childminder has a suitable understanding of the vast majority of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. However, she has not completed the progress check for children when aged two years and has not provided parents with a short written report of their children's progress. However, the childminder keeps parents up to date by telling them about their children's progress, so the failure to meet the requirement has not had a significant impact on them. The childminder does not currently evaluate her practice accurately. She does not successfully identify all her professional development needs and address these to keep the quality of the provision to an overall standard of good. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder has a clear understanding of local safeguarding procedures and knows what to do if she is concerned for children's safety. The childminder takes appropriate steps to ensure her home is safe for children's use.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder is experienced and has a suitable knowledge of child development. However, she does not always obtain initial information about children's development when they first start or carry out required assessments to support her in planning stimulating activities for the children's differing learning needs. Children sometimes lose interest in their play. At other times, children enjoy playing with resources, such as toy trains and building train tracks. However, the childminder does not extend this play, and misses chances to encourage an early understanding of mathematical concepts such as counting and sizes. Children show interest in a range of musical toys and they enjoy using these to create sounds.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
The childminder has many good quality and interesting toys and resources; however, she does not ensure that the environment is well set out to enable young children to find easily those that interest them, to extend their growing independence. The childminder encourages positive behaviour from a young age. Children have good opportunities for physical activities; for example, the children go out every day for fresh air and exercise to the local parks. The childminder keeps parents informed about their children's day, for example, by having daily conversations with them and through the use of daily diaries.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children are not well prepared for the next stage of their learning. They learn to share and to take turns, and they develop their coordination. However, children do not progress quickly in learning independently or in gaining early mathematical skills.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 105782 Local authority Kensington & Chelsea Inspection number 839338 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 5 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection 8 February 2010
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 1994 and lives in a second floor flat in Sloane Square, in the London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The childminder works each weekday from 8am to 6pm, all year round, except for family holidays and bank holidays. The childminder has a childcare qualification at level 3 and works with another registered childminder from the same address.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion